{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T16:10:50Z","timestamp":1791389450557,"version":"4.3.3"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,14]],"date-time":"2016-07-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1468454400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Journal of Prosthodontics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,6]]},"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>\n \n Purpose<\/jats:title>\n To record the distal cantilever lengths (CL) of full\u2010arch, definitive hybrid prostheses fabricated for patients after treatment with an immediate occlusal loading protocol. Anterior\/posterior (AP) spreads were measured on master casts of the definitive prostheses. CL\/AP ratios were calculated for these 2 parameters. These measurements were then compared and evaluated for statistical and clinical significance; the CL\/AP ratios were also compared between definitive and interim prostheses.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Materials and Methods<\/jats:title>\n One hundred thirty patients with 193 edentulous arches (112 maxillary; 81 mandibular; 191 arches restored with 4 implants; 2 maxillary arches restored with 5 implants) were treated. Seven hundred seventy\u2010four implants (Nobel Biocare Br\u00e5nemark System [Nobel Active]) were included in this report. All but 2 patients had 4 implants placed into each jaw: the anterior implants were relatively vertical; the posterior implants were tilted parallel to the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus and angled distally above the mental foramen. Patients were treated and followed in private practice by the author. Implants had to have at least 35 Ncm of insertion torque to be immediately loaded. All implants were immediately loaded with full functional occlusions via interim, full\u2010arch, all\u2010acrylic resin prostheses. Definitive full\u2010arch, hybrid prostheses were fabricated approximately 6 to 9 months after implant placement with computer\u2010aided design\/computer\u2010aided manufacturing (CAD\/CAM) frameworks, denture bases, and acrylic resin denture teeth. Measurements of the distal cantilevered segments were made with a Boley gauge on the interim and definitive prostheses prior to insertion. AP spreads were measured on the master casts made from abutment level impressions approximately 4 months post\u2010occlusal loading. Prosthetic complications such as denture base fractures and cohesive\/adhesive denture tooth fractures were recorded in the charts as they occurred. All charts were reviewed for this report. Prosthetic repairs for the definitive prostheses were analyzed by type (tooth or denture base), arch, gender, and location within the edentulous arches.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n Patients were followed for up to 48 months post\u2010immediate occlusal loading. One patient experienced maxillary implant failure; the overall implant survival rate (SR) was 99.5% (770 of 774). Four hundred forty\u2010six of 450 maxillary implants and 324 of 324 mandibular implants survived for SRs of 99.1% and 100%, respectively. Thirty\u2010three of the 193 interim prostheses (17.1%) warranted at least one repair during treatment. One of the 193 definitive prostheses demonstrated a posterior denture base fracture. The average cantilevered segments for the definitive maxillary prostheses were 15.6 mm (right) and 15.4 mm (left). The average cantilevered segments for the definitive mandibular prostheses were 15.5 mm (right) and 15.6 mm (left). The average maxillary AP spread was 18.4 mm; the average mandibular AP spread was 17.3 mm. Average maxillary CL\/AP spread ratios were 0.85 (right) and 0.84 (left); average mandibular CL\/AP spread ratios were 0.89 (right) and 0.90 (left). There were no statistically significant associations between the CL\/AP ratios and the frequency or type of prosthetic repairs recorded in this study.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n The results from this 4\u2010year clinical retrospective analysis indicated that one of 130 patients experienced implant failures. The prosthetic complication rate for the definitive prostheses in this study was less than 1% (0.005). The author suggests that the parameters used in this study's framework designs for full\u2010arch, titanium milled frameworks (CL\/AP ratio <1), resulted in consistent, predictable results for rehabilitating edentulous patients.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.12519","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,14]],"date-time":"2016-07-14T10:17:29Z","timestamp":1468491449000},"page":"402-408","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":36,"title":["Ratios of Cantilever Lengths and Anterior\u2010Posterior Spreads of Definitive Hybrid Full\u2010Arch, Screw\u2010Retained Prostheses: Results of a Clinical Study"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"27","author":[{"given":"Carl","family":"Drago","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Gundersen Health System LaCrosse WI"},{"name":"Marquette University School of Dentistry Milwaukee WI"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,14]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_1","first-page":"117","volume-title":"Tissue Integrated Prostheses","author":"Branemark I","year":"1985"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_1","first-page":"10387","article-title":"A 15 year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw","author":"Adell R","year":"1981","journal-title":"Int J Oral Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-3913(88)90355-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_1","first-page":"241","article-title":"Forces and moments on Branemark Implants","volume":"4","author":"Rangert B","year":"1989","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-3913(90)90177-E"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_1","first-page":"417","article-title":"Long\u2010term treatment outcomes in edentulous patients with implant\u2010fixed prostheses: the Toronto study","volume":"17","author":"Attard N","year":"2004","journal-title":"Int J Prosthodont"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2012.02524.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2011.00383.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3913(96)90301-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_1","first-page":"539","article-title":"Three\u2010dimensional finite element analysis of load transmission using different implant inclinations and cantilever lengths","volume":"21","author":"Bevilacqua M","year":"2008","journal-title":"Int J Prosthodont"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_1","first-page":"331","article-title":"Determination of cantilever length\u2010anterior\u2010posterior spread ratio assuming failure criteria to be the compromise of the prosthesis retaining screw\u2010prosthesis joint","volume":"11","author":"McAlarney M","year":"1996","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3913(00)70137-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2008.01699.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.12228"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_16_1","first-page":"480","article-title":"Accelerated treatment protocols: full arch treatment with interim and definitive prostheses","volume":"60","author":"Drago C","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Gen Dentistry"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2004.08.013"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_18_1","volume-title":"Implant survival and frequency of prosthetic complications associated with interim, acrylic resin immediately, loaded full arch prostheses: a 2 year retrospective clinical review","author":"Drago C","year":"2015"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_1","volume-title":"Cantilever lengths and anterior\u2010posterior spreads of interim, acrylic resin, full\u2010arch screw\u2010retained prostheses and their relationship to prosthetic complications","author":"Drago C","year":"2016"}],"container-title":["Journal of Prosthodontics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fjopr.12519","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fjopr.12519","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jopr.12519","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,23]],"date-time":"2023-09-23T19:06:30Z","timestamp":1695495990000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jopr.12519"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,14]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,6]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/jopr.12519"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.12519","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1059-941X","1532-849X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1059-941X","type":"print"},{"value":"1532-849X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,14]]}}}