{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,2]],"date-time":"2026-09-02T20:26:01Z","timestamp":1788380761064,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,23]],"date-time":"2021-02-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1614038400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Prosthodontics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>\u00a0To compare the fracture strength of three\u2010unit provisional partial fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) fabricated by an indirect\u2010direct technique from poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) through digital and conventional workflows, and FDPs fabricated by a direct technique using Bisacryl (BisA) and externally reinforced BisA.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Materials and Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>\u00a0Forty partially edentulous typodonts with a missing mandibular left first molar and standard preparations on mandibular left second premolar and molar were used to fabricate three\u2010unit provisional FDPs. Two materials and two techniques were used to fabricate a total of forty provisional FDPs: (1) BisA; (2) BisA reinforced with glass fiber strips [BisA\u2010GFR]; (3) conventionally fabricated PMMA shell relined with PMMA [C\u2010PMMA]; (4) CAD\/CAM fabricated PMMA shell relined with PMMA [CAD\/CAM\u2010PMMA]. Provisional FDPs were then luted onto the preparations using a temporary cement. Specimens were mounted onto a chewing simulator; 20,000 cycles of 70 N forces were applied under 25\u00b0C distilled water. Specimens were then loaded to fracture using a universal testing machine (The Dillion Quantrol TC2i; Mecmesin) with a crosshead speed of 2 mm\/min. One\u2010way ANOVA, followed by Tukey post hoc test, was used to assess the effect of production technique on the fracture strength of the provisional FPDs (\u03b1 = 0.5).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>\u00a0Mean fracture strengths recorded for the CAD\/CAM\u2010PMMA, C\u2010PMMA, BisA, and BisA\u2010GFR groups were 520 N, 448 N, 245 N, and 169 N, respectively. PMMA groups had significantly (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.0001; F = 24.40) higher fracture strength compared to Bisacryl groups.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>\u00a0When high occlusal forces are expected, provisional FDPs fabricated with PMMA using the indirect\u2010direct technique are recommended, irrespective of CAD\/CAM or conventional workflow.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13325","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,16]],"date-time":"2021-01-16T00:32:24Z","timestamp":1610757144000},"page":"720-724","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":18,"title":["Fracture Strength of Interim CAD\/CAM and Conventional Partial Fixed Dental Prostheses"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"30","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4874-583X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ramtin","family":"Sadid\u2010Zadeh","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Restorative Dentistry University of Buffalo School of Dental Medicine  Buffalo NY"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Cory","family":"Zirkel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Buffalo School of Dental Medicine  Buffalo NY"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Seteven","family":"Makwoka","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Restorative Dentistry University of Buffalo School of Dental Medicine  Buffalo NY"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rui","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Restorative Dentistry University of Buffalo School of Dental Medicine  Buffalo NY"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_1_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3913(03)00259-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_1","first-page":"101","article-title":"Comparison of fracture loads of CAD\/CAM and conventionally fabricated temporary fixed dental prostheses after different aging regimens","volume":"19","author":"Edelhoff D","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Comput Dent"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1532-849X.2006.00110.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3913(08)60108-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3913(98)70204-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mpr.2003.29"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2003.12.003"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3913(96)90348-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_1","first-page":"318","article-title":"Effect of glass\u2010fiber reinforcement and water storage on fracture toughness (KIC) of polymer\u2010based provisional crown and FPD materials","volume":"17","author":"Kim SH","year":"2004","journal-title":"Int J Prosthodont"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2014.12.023"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-019-02952-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3913(13)60378-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2010.11.012"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-011-0670-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbiomech.2009.01.037"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016357.2010.545034"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2008.08.009"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3913(13)60022-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016359509005982"}],"container-title":["Journal of Prosthodontics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jopr.13325","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1111\/jopr.13325","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jopr.13325","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,30]],"date-time":"2023-08-30T01:05:56Z","timestamp":1693357556000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jopr.13325"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,23]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/jopr.13325"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.13325","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1059-941X","1532-849X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1059-941X","type":"print"},{"value":"1532-849X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,23]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2020-12-21","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2021-02-23","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}