{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,10]],"date-time":"2026-02-10T19:56:04Z","timestamp":1770753364321,"version":"3.50.0"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"S1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,21]],"date-time":"2022-03-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1647820800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":20,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Prosthodontics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>To assess the implant\u2010abutment discrepancy of complete\u2010arch frameworks manufactured using milling and additive electron beam melting (EBM) technologies, before and after acrylic resin veneering application.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Materials and Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>A definitive implant cast with six implant replicas was digitized using a laboratory scanner. A software program was used to design an implant\u2010supported framework which was manufactured using milling (M group) and EBM (EBM group) technologies (n = 10). In the M group, titanium milled specimens were fabricated. In the EBM group, titanium EBM specimens were obtained. A coordinate measurement machine (CMM) was used to assess the implant\u2010abutment discrepancy at x\u2010, y\u2010, and z\u2010axed between the specimens and the implant\u2010abutment replicas of the definitive cast. The implant replicas positioned on the lateral incisor positions were not able to be assessed. The 3D gap discrepancy was calculated: . Acrylic resin veneering procedures were finished and the same CMM measurements were completed. Three\u2010way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to analyze the data (\u03b1 = 0.05).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The manufacturing method (df = 1, F = 7.00, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.009) and implant position (df = 3, F = 129.82, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.001) were significant predictors of the x\u2010axis discrepancy. The veneering procedures (df = 1, F = 21.55, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.001) and implant position (df = 3, F = 95.42, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.001) were significant predictors of the y\u2010axis discrepancy. The manufacturing method (df = 1, F = 11.79, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.001) was a significant predictor of the z\u2010axis discrepancy. Lastly, the manufacturing method (df = 1, F = 5.11, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> = 0.026), implant position (df = 3, F = 11.36, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.001), and veneering procedures (df = 1, F = 41.56, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic> &lt; 0.001) were significant predictors of the 3D gap discrepancy in which the manufacturing method explains the 2.37% of variation in the 3D gap discrepancy, the implant position explains the 15.82% of variation in the 3D gap discrepancy, and veneering procedures explain the 19.29% of variation in the 3D gap discrepancy results.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p>The manufacturing methods, veneering procedures, and implant position influenced the linear implant\u2010abutment discrepancy. The milled technique tested obtained lower linear implant\u2010abutment discrepancy compared with the EBM method evaluated. The acrylic resin veneering procedures increased the implant\u2010abutment discrepancy.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13422","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,21]],"date-time":"2022-03-21T19:37:27Z","timestamp":1647891447000},"page":"88-96","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Implant\u2010Abutment Discrepancy Before and After Acrylic Resin Veneering of Complete\u2010Arch Titanium Frameworks Manufactured Using Milling and Electron Beam Melting Technologies"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"31","author":[{"given":"Marta","family":"Revilla\u2010Le\u00f3n","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry University of Washington  Seattle Washington USA"},{"name":"Research and Digital Dentistry Department Kois Center  Seattle Washington USA"},{"name":"Revilla Research Center  Madrid Spain"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Javier","family":"P\u00e9rez\u2010L\u00f3pez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Oral Design Laboratory  Lugo Spain"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Abdul B.","family":"Barmak","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Eastman Institute of Oral Health University of Rochester Medical Center  Rochester NY"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ariel J.","family":"Raigrodski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Washington School of Dentistry  Seattle WA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jeffrey","family":"Rubenstein","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry University of Washington  Seattle Washington USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"German O.","family":"Galluci","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Science Harvard School of Dental Medicine  Boston MA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_1","first-page":"55","article-title":"Metal additive manufacturing technologies: literature review of current status and prosthodontic applications","volume":"22","author":"Revilla\u2010Le\u00f3n M","year":"2019","journal-title":"Int J Comput Dent"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13212"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_4_1","unstructured":"LarsonR:Method and device for producing three\u2010dimensional bodies. US Patent US5786562A.1993."},{"key":"e_1_2_8_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1005-0302(12)60016-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13076"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2018.02.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jbm.b.30800"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-3913(77)90173-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1532-849X.1999.tb00032.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_11_1","first-page":"346","article-title":"Three\u2010dimensional analysis of the casting accuracy of one piece, osseointegrated implant retained prostheses","volume":"6","author":"Tan KB","year":"1993","journal-title":"Int J Prosthodont"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3913(97)70011-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-3913(94)90246-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3913(99)70229-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3913(83)80101-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_16_1","first-page":"270","article-title":"Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Br\u00e5nemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup","volume":"6","author":"Jemt T","year":"1991","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2842.1995.tb01049.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2008.00131.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_19_1","first-page":"194","article-title":"Comparisons of precision of fit between cast and CNC milled titanium implant frameworks for the edentulous mandible","volume":"16","author":"\u00d6rtorp A","year":"2003","journal-title":"Int J Prosthodont"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mpr.2003.40"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_21_1","first-page":"125","article-title":"A comparison of the accuracy of fit of 2 methods for fabricating implant\u2010prosthodontic frameworks","volume":"20","author":"Al\u2010Fadda SA","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int J Prosthodont"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2842.1996.d01-193.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_23_1","first-page":"63","article-title":"Design of superstructures for osseointegrated fixtures","volume":"28","author":"Klineberg IJ","year":"1985","journal-title":"Swed Dent J Suppl"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-3913(81)90036-6"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12522"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/cid.12839"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2014.02.006"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2013.07.005"}],"container-title":["Journal of Prosthodontics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jopr.13422","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1111\/jopr.13422","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jopr.13422","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,25]],"date-time":"2023-08-25T19:10:45Z","timestamp":1692990645000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jopr.13422"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"S1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/jopr.13422"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.13422","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1059-941X","1532-849X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1059-941X","type":"print"},{"value":"1532-849X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2021-06-16","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2022-03-21","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}