{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,3]],"date-time":"2026-07-03T00:18:36Z","timestamp":1783037916693,"version":"3.54.6"},"reference-count":42,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,13]],"date-time":"2023-03-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1678665600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Prosthodontics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title><jats:p>To compare the accuracy of digitizing conventional impressions to intraoral surface scans for all\u2010on\u2010four treatment in the maxillary arch.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Materials and methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>An edentulous maxillary arch model with four implants placed in an all\u2010on\u2010four design was fabricated. Intraoral surface scans (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u00a0=\u00a010) were obtained using an intraoral scanner after scan body insertion. For conventional polyvinylsiloxane impressions of the model, implant copings were inserted into the implant fixation for implant level, opened tray impressions (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u00a0=\u00a010). The model and conventional impressions were digitized to obtain digital files. A reference file was created using a laboratory\u2010scanned conventional standard tessellation language (STL) file with analog to scan the body using exocad software. STL datasets from the two digital and conventional impression groups were superimposed with reference files to assess the 3D deviations. Two\u2010way ANOVA and paired\u2010samples <jats:italic>t<\/jats:italic>\u2010test was performed to assess the difference in trueness and examine the effects of impression technique and implant angulation on the deviation amount.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>No significant differences were found between the conventional impression and intraoral surface scan groups <jats:italic>F<\/jats:italic>(1, 76)\u00a0=\u00a02.705, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u00a0=\u00a00.104. No significant differences were found between conventional straight and digital straight implants and between conventional and digital tilted implants <jats:italic>F<\/jats:italic>(1, 76)\u00a0=\u00a0.041, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u00a0=\u00a00.841. No significant differences were found between conventional straight and conventional tilted implants <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u00a0=\u00a00.07 and between digital straight and digital tilted implants <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u00a0=\u00a00.08.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Digital scans were more accurate than conventional impressions. The digital straight implants were more accurate than the conventional straight implants, and the digital tilted implants were more accurate than the conventional tilted implants, with higher accuracy for digital straight implants.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13666","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,22]],"date-time":"2023-02-22T16:39:10Z","timestamp":1677083950000},"page":"171-179","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Evaluation of the trueness and precision of conventional impressions versus digital scans for the all\u2010on\u2010four treatment in the maxillary arch: An in vitro study"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"33","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9586-5984","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nour Jamal","family":"Marshaha","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Graduate Prosthodontics, Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry Riyadh Elm University  Riyadh Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8749-4714","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Amr Ahmed","family":"Azhari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry King Abdulaziz University  Jeddah Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8804-6585","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mansour K","family":"Assery","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry Riyadh Elm University  Riyadh Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1810-8733","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Walaa Magdy","family":"Ahmed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry King Abdulaziz University  Jeddah Saudi Arabia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_1","first-page":"639","article-title":"Immediate rehabilitation of the completely edentulous jaw with fixed prostheses supported by either upright or tilted implants: a multicenter clinical study","volume":"22","author":"Capelli M","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00010.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/ID.0000000000000064"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.11607\/ijp.4341"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2013.07.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12853"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.14219\/jada.2013.45"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph16050829"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpor.2019.06.001"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.11607\/jomi.3689"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0043312"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.11607\/jomi.3460"},{"issue":"7","key":"e_1_2_8_14_1","article-title":"Intraoral digital impressioning for dental implant restorations versus traditional implant impression techniques","volume":"36","author":"Wilk BL","year":"2015","journal-title":"Compend Contin Educ Dent"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_15_1","unstructured":"ChristensenGJ.Impressions Are Changing: JADA.2009;140:29:4:529\u201030 532\u20103."},{"key":"e_1_2_8_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3913(13)60028-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-013-1132-y"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2007.08.008"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.bdj.2008.350"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/ID.0000000000000353"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2013.04.010"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/ID.0b013e3182980fe9"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2011.00416.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2012.02546.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.11607\/jomi.3625"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-011-0564-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-011-0622-z"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.11607\/jomi.4942"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2015.09.011"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.12527"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.13844"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2021.05.006"},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_2_8_33_1","first-page":"166","article-title":"Strain development of screw\u2010retained implant\u2010supported fixed restorations: procera implant bridge versus conventionally cast restorations","volume":"25","author":"Karl M","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int J Prosthodont"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_8_34_1","first-page":"11","article-title":"Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions\u2014an in\u2010vitro study","volume":"14","author":"Ender A","year":"2011","journal-title":"Int J Comput Dent"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_8_35_1","first-page":"9","article-title":"In\u2010vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full\u2010arch dental impressions","volume":"46","author":"Ender A","year":"2015","journal-title":"Quintessence Int"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.11607\/jomi.3900"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_2_8_37_1","first-page":"101","article-title":"Accuracy of digital implant impressions with intraoral scanners. A systematic review","volume":"10","author":"Rutk\u016bnas V","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur J Oral Implantol"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.11607\/ijp.4417"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.11607\/jomi.3343"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12567"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_41_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2319\/100307-475.1"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/ijos.2013.49"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_43_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.12302"}],"container-title":["Journal of Prosthodontics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jopr.13666","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1111\/jopr.13666","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jopr.13666","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,10]],"date-time":"2024-02-10T19:46:10Z","timestamp":1707594370000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jopr.13666"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,13]]},"references-count":42,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,2]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/jopr.13666"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.13666","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1059-941X","1532-849X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1059-941X","type":"print"},{"value":"1532-849X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,13]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2022-07-21","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2023-02-05","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2023-03-13","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}