{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,10]],"date-time":"2026-10-10T05:51:11Z","timestamp":1791611471347,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":9,"publisher":"Wiley","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,9]],"date-time":"2026-10-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1791504000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,9]],"date-time":"2026-10-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1791504000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/doi.wiley.com\/10.1002\/tdm_license_1.1"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Prosthodontics"],"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>\n \n Purpose<\/jats:title>\n To understand the effectiveness of traditional vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) tray adhesive on 3D\u2010printed custom tray material.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Materials and Methods<\/jats:title>\n Custom tray specimens were designed using Meshmixer (Meshmixer, San Rafael, CA, USA) and made of urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) Megatray (Select Dental, New York, USA), Formlabs Custom Tray Resin (Formlabs, Somerville, MA, USA), and Asiga DentaTRAY (Asiga, Sydney, Australia). Each tray was designed to have a flat 25\u00a0mm x 25\u00a0mm base, a wall of 6\u00a0mm height angled at 45 degrees to the base, and an attachment area for testing. The UDMA samples served as the study's control group. Printed trays were either unaltered or abraded with 100\u2010\u00b5m aluminum oxide at 30\u00a0bar. VPS Tray Adhesive (Kerr, Michigan, USA) was placed on the trays and allowed to dry in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions for use. Aquasil Ultra + Smart Wetting Tray Impression Material (Charlotte, North Carolina, USA) was placed on the tray and allowed to set. A universal testing machine (Model E10000, Instron Corp, Massachusetts, USA) was used to place 1.4\u00a0kg of pressure on the tray specimen to mimic intraoral pressure. Then, it was pulled to conduct the peel test, separating the custom tray from the VPS. A one\u2010way ANOVA was performed with tray group serving as the independent variable and maximum load to peel as the dependent variable. Two independent planned comparisons were performed to test impression material (Asiga vs. Formlabs) and effects of abrasion (Unaltered vs. Air\u2010Particle Abrasion).<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n The Asiga\u2014Unaltered tray group exhibited the highest adhesive properties of all trays, with a mean force of adhesive failure of 76.94 \u00b1 6.98 N. The lowest was the Asiga\u2014Air\u2010Particle Abrasion group with a mean value of 56.78 \u00b1 6.07 N. The Asiga\u2014Unaltered test group results reflect the most similar results to the UDMA control group with values of 76.94 \u00b1 6.98 N and 75.12 \u00b1 6.77 N, respectively.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n The Asiga DentaTRAY Resin performed the best with the highest load to peel values when compared to the control and Formlabs Custom Tray Resin. It was also determined that air\u2010particle abrading of the 3D\u2010printed trays resulted in lower values of adhesion. Some 3D\u2010printed resins could provide comparable, if not better retention of VPS when compared to traditional UDMA tray material.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.70254","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,10]],"date-time":"2026-10-10T05:36:05Z","timestamp":1791610565000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Bond strength of vinyl polysiloxane tray adhesive to 3D\u2010printed tray materials: A comparison study"],"prefix":"10.1111","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0401-7016","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gregory Neil","family":"Wilkins","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics US Army Advanced Education Program in Prosthodontics Tingay Dental Clinic Fort Gordon Georgia USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6540-3319","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sloan D.","family":"McLaughlin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics US Army Advanced Education Program in Prosthodontics Tingay Dental Clinic Fort Gordon Georgia USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2678-1672","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Steven E.","family":"Handel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics US Army Advanced Education Program in Prosthodontics Tingay Dental Clinic Fort Gordon Georgia USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jennifer V.","family":"Sabol","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics US Army Advanced Education Program in Prosthodontics Tingay Dental Clinic Fort Gordon Georgia USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jds.2021.04.004"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13212"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/ma14061550"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.bdj.2015.914"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2020.04.015"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_7_1","volume-title":"Skinner's science of dental materials","author":"Skinner EW","year":"1973"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2005.06.011"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_9_1","first-page":"303","article-title":"The effect of custom tray material type and surface treatment on the tensile bond strength of an impression material\/adhesive system","volume":"6","author":"Dixon DL","year":"1993","journal-title":"Int J Prosthodont."},{"key":"e_1_2_8_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/ma11101905"}],"container-title":["Journal of Prosthodontics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jopr.70254","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1111\/jopr.70254","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jopr.70254","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,10]],"date-time":"2026-10-10T05:36:07Z","timestamp":1791610567000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jopr.70254"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,9]]},"references-count":9,"alternative-id":["10.1111\/jopr.70254"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.70254","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1059-941X","1532-849X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1059-941X","type":"print"},{"value":"1532-849X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2026-02-23","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2026-09-21","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2026-10-09","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}],"article-number":"jopr.70254"}}