{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T08:28:20Z","timestamp":1740126500908,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":45,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,4]],"date-time":"2017-07-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1499126400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Psychiatric Ment Health Nurs"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Accessible summary<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>What is known on the subject?<\/jats:title><jats:p>\n<jats:list list-type=\"bullet\">\n\n<jats:list-item><jats:p>People with mental health problems and learning disabilities often do not receive the care they require.<\/jats:p><\/jats:list-item>\n\n<jats:list-item><jats:p>The Care Programme Approach (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CPA<\/jats:styled-content>) is meant to help with this. However, there have been many problems in the past with the introduction of the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CPA<\/jats:styled-content> into mental health services.<\/jats:p><\/jats:list-item>\n\n<jats:list-item><jats:p>There is no literature which explores what factors help or hinder the introduction of the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CPA<\/jats:styled-content> for service users with a mental health and learning disability, especially from the perspective of those responsible for overseeing this process.<\/jats:p><\/jats:list-item>\n<\/jats:list>\n<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>What does this article add to existing knowledge?<\/jats:title><jats:p>\n<jats:list list-type=\"bullet\">\n\n<jats:list-item><jats:p>The implementation of the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CPA<\/jats:styled-content> for this service user group is fragmented, and services are not working together in partnership.<\/jats:p><\/jats:list-item>\n\n<jats:list-item><jats:p>The <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CPA<\/jats:styled-content> is being effectively implemented for people who are deemed to present with a risk to themselves or others. If a service user does not present with a high risk, they are not provided care through the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CPA<\/jats:styled-content>.<\/jats:p><\/jats:list-item>\n\n<jats:list-item><jats:p>Service users were not involved in the development or introduction of the policy in practice.<\/jats:p><\/jats:list-item>\n<\/jats:list>\n<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>What are the implications for practice?<\/jats:title><jats:p>\n<jats:list list-type=\"bullet\">\n\n<jats:list-item><jats:p>Services need to work better at engaging service users when they are developing and introducing new policies.<\/jats:p><\/jats:list-item>\n\n<jats:list-item><jats:p>Rather than applying the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CPA<\/jats:styled-content> for all service users, across all services, it should only be considered for those deemed to present with a high risk. It is effectively implemented for these people.<\/jats:p><\/jats:list-item>\n\n<jats:list-item><jats:p>For those not deemed to present with a high risk, services should consider using alternative service user led care planning frameworks.<\/jats:p><\/jats:list-item>\n<\/jats:list>\n<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title><jats:p>The Care Programme Approach was introduced in England to ensure services met the needs of people with mental health problems and a concurrent learning disability (dual diagnosis). The <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CPA<\/jats:styled-content> implementation was patchy and services failed to work in partnership.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Aim<\/jats:title><jats:p>This study aimed to explore the factors shaping the recent implementation of the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CPA<\/jats:styled-content> for service users with a dual diagnosis.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Method<\/jats:title><jats:p>A single case study approach was undertaken. Data were collected through interview (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u00a0=\u00a026), documentary analysis (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u00a0=\u00a064), steering group observation (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u00a0=\u00a03) and the Partnership Assessment Tool (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u00a0=\u00a026). Data were analysed using the Framework Approach.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CPA<\/jats:styled-content> was only effectively implemented for people who were deemed to present with a high level of risk.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Discussion<\/jats:title><jats:p>The problems associated with implementation in the 1990s continue more recently for those with a dual diagnosis. The <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CPA<\/jats:styled-content> has become more aligned with risk management protocols than supporting individual service user's recovery.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Implications for practice<\/jats:title><jats:p>Service users should be involved in the implementation of policies which have an impact on their recovery. The <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CPA<\/jats:styled-content> should only be applied for those who present with high\u2010risk issues, whilst alternative user\u2010led initiatives should be considered for other service users.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/jpm.12398","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,5,10]],"date-time":"2017-05-10T20:12:45Z","timestamp":1494447165000},"page":"396-402","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["The implementation of the Care Programme Approach for service users with a learning disability. Building Bridges to the same Old Horizons?"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"24","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6268-053X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"M.","family":"Kelly","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Mental Health Social Work and Integrative Medicine School of Health and Education Middlesex University  London UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_1","first-page":"415","article-title":"Auditing the Care Programme Approach for people with learning disabilities: A 4\u00a0year audit cycle","volume":"30","author":"Ali A.","year":"2006","journal-title":"The Psychiatrist"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1108\/09513550410562257"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijnurstu.2015.07.008"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_5_1","first-page":"28","article-title":"Service innovations: Risk assessment in learning disability","volume":"29","author":"Bhaumik S.","year":"2005","journal-title":"The Psychiatrist."},{"volume-title":"Risk, safety and recovery","year":"2014","author":"Boardman J.","key":"e_1_2_8_6_1"},{"volume-title":"Report on the South Thames regional audit of CPA and risk assessment\/management implementation in services for people with learning disabilities and mental health problems","year":"2005","author":"Brooks J.","key":"e_1_2_8_7_1"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_8_1","article-title":"Ordinary risks and accepted fictions: How contrasting and competing priorities work in risk assessment and mental health care planning","author":"Coffey M.","year":"2016","journal-title":"Health Expectations"},{"volume-title":"Mental Health Recovery and Wellness Action Plan (WRAP)","year":"2006","author":"Copeland M. E.","key":"e_1_2_8_9_1"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_10_1","unstructured":"Department of Health. (1990).The Care Programme Approach for people with a mental illness referred to the specialist psychiatric services.Department of Health:London. (Circular HC(90)23\/LASSL(90)1)."},{"volume-title":"Building Bridges","year":"1995","author":"Department of Health","key":"e_1_2_8_11_1"},{"volume-title":"Still Building Bridges: The report of a national inspection of arrangements for the inspection of the Care Programme Approach with Care Management","year":"1999","author":"Department of Health","key":"e_1_2_8_12_1"},{"volume-title":"Valuing People. A new strategy for learning disabilities for the 21st Century","year":"2001","author":"Department of Health","key":"e_1_2_8_13_1"},{"volume-title":"Green Light for Mental Health","year":"2004","author":"Department of Health","key":"e_1_2_8_14_1"},{"volume-title":"Refocusing the Care Programme Approach. Policy and Positive Practice Guidance","year":"2008","author":"Department of Health","key":"e_1_2_8_15_1"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_16_1","unstructured":"Department of Health. (2008b).Making the CPA work for you. It is not about how you fit into services. It is about how services fit with you.Department of Health:London."},{"key":"e_1_2_8_17_1","unstructured":"Department of Health. (2009).New Horizons. Towards a shared vision for mental health. Consultation Document.Department of Health:London."},{"volume-title":"No health without mental health: A cross government mental health outcome strategy for people of all ages","year":"2011","author":"Department of Health","key":"e_1_2_8_18_1"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1108\/14668201211286066"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_20_1","unstructured":"Glendinning C. Hudson B. Hardy B. &Young R. (2002).National evaluation of notifications for use of the Section 31 partnership flexibilities in the Health Act 1999. Nuffield Institute for Health: University of Leeds and the National Primary Care Research and Development Centre University of Manchester."},{"volume-title":"Service users\u2019 experiences of recovery under the 2008 Care Programme Approach","year":"2012","author":"Gould D.","key":"e_1_2_8_21_1"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jpm.12378"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_23_1","unstructured":"Hardy B. Hudson B. &Waddington E. (2000).What makes a good partnership? A Partnership Assessment Tool.Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and Nuffield Institute for Health (University of Leeds):Leeds."},{"key":"e_1_2_8_24_1","unstructured":"Hardy B. Hudson B. &Waddington E. (2003).Assessing strategic partnership: The partnership assessment tool. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and NuffieldInstitute for Health (University of Leeds): Leeds."},{"key":"e_1_2_8_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/YCO.0b013e3283060a6a"},{"volume-title":"Implementing public policy","year":"2014","author":"Hill M.","key":"e_1_2_8_26_1"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_27_1","unstructured":"Hudson B. Young R. Hardy B. &Glendinning C. (2002).National evaluation of notifications for use of Section 31 partnership flexibilities of the Health Act 1999.Nuffield Institute for Health:Leeds."},{"volume-title":"Guidance for commissioners of mental health services for people with learning disabilities","year":"2013","author":"Joint Commissioning Panel for Mental Health","key":"e_1_2_8_28_1"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1744629513508383"},{"volume-title":"Living with risk. Mental health service user involvement in risk assessment and management","year":"2004","author":"Langan J.","key":"e_1_2_8_30_1"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1192\/apt.10.2.124"},{"volume-title":"Mental health recovery star: User guide","year":"2008","author":"MacKeith J.","key":"e_1_2_8_32_1"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-137-08228-2"},{"volume-title":"Qualitative data analysis","year":"1994","author":"Mile M. B.","key":"e_1_2_8_34_1"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.320.7227.114"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203413081_chapter_9"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_37_1","first-page":"219","volume-title":"Qualitative research practice","author":"Ritchie J.","year":"2003"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1192\/apt.6.5.380"},{"volume-title":"Rethinking risk to others in mental health services (CR201)","year":"2016","author":"Royal College of Psychiatrists","key":"e_1_2_8_39_1"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1192\/bjp.175.5.422"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_41_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2648.2005.03636.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12888-016-0858-x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_43_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2850.2003.00640.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_44_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511581649"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_45_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1192\/apt.11.3.214"},{"volume-title":"Case Study Research; Design and Methods","year":"2009","author":"Yin R. K.","key":"e_1_2_8_46_1"}],"container-title":["Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fjpm.12398","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jpm.12398","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,2]],"date-time":"2023-10-02T06:07:00Z","timestamp":1696226820000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jpm.12398"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,4]]},"references-count":45,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/jpm.12398"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jpm.12398","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1351-0126","1365-2850"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1351-0126"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1365-2850"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,4]]}}}