{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,14]],"date-time":"2026-09-14T23:49:21Z","timestamp":1789429761578,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,6,9]],"date-time":"2013-06-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1370736000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Medical Education"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Context<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The multiple mini\u2010interview (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">MMI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ) is the primary admissions tool used to assess non\u2010cognitive skills at Dundee Medical School. Although the\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">MMI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      shows promise, more research is required to demonstrate its transferability and predictive validity, for instance, relative to other UK pre\u2010admissions measures.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Applicants were selected for interview based on a combination of measures derived from the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UCAS<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ) form (academic achievement, medical experience, non\u2010academic achievement and references) and the UK Clinical Aptitude Test\n                      <jats:bold>(<\/jats:bold>\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UKCAT<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      ) in 2009 and 2010. Candidates were selected into medical school according to a weighted combination of the\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UKCAT<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      , the\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UCAS<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      form and\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">MMI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      scores. Examination scores were matched for 140 and 128 first\u2010 and second\u2010year students, respectively, who took the 2009\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">MMI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      s, and 150 first\u2010year students who took the 2010\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">MMI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      s. Pearson's correlations were used to test the relationships between pre\u2010admission variables, examination scores and demographic variables, namely gender and age. Statistically significant correlations were adjusted for range restrictions and were used to select variables for multiple linear regression analysis to predict examination scores.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Statistically significant correlations ranged from 0.18 to 0.34 and 0.23 to 0.50 unrestricted. Multiple regression confirmed that\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">MMI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      s remained the most consistent predictor of medical school assessments. No scores derived from the\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UCAS<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      form correlated significantly with examination scores.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      This study reports positive findings from the largest undergraduate sample to date. The\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">MMI<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      was the most consistent predictor of success in early years at medical school across two separate cohorts.\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UKCAT<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      and\n                      <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UCAS<\/jats:styled-content>\n                      forms showed minimal or no predictive ability. Further research in this area appears worthwhile, with longitudinal studies, replication of results from other medical schools and more detailed analysis of knowledge, skills and attitudinal outcome markers.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/medu.12193","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,6,9]],"date-time":"2013-06-09T22:22:25Z","timestamp":1370816545000},"page":"717-725","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":63,"title":["Predictive validity of the Dundee multiple mini\u2010interview"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"47","author":[{"given":"Adrian","family":"Husbands","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Clinical and Population Sciences and Education University of Dundee Dundee UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jonathan","family":"Dowell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Clinical and Population Sciences and Education University of Dundee Dundee UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,6,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_10_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00001888-200303000-00016"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2923.2004.01776.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2923.2008.03018.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2923.2007.02767.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2929.2005.02348.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00001888-200406000-00021"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/0142159X.2012.652706"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/0142159X.2010.541532"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2929.2007.02709.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2923.2009.03407.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00001888-200410001-00012"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.38768.590174.55"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.324.7343.952"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10459-009-9160-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2923.2010.03792.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_17_1","unstructured":"About the test: What is in the test? UKCAT.http:\/\/www.ukcat.ac.uk\/about-the-test\/what-is-in-the-test\/"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2923.2009.03535.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6920-10-55"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_20_1","first-page":"431","article-title":"Colloquy: should familywise alpha be adjusted? Against familywise alpha adjustment","volume":"29","author":"O'Keefe D","year":"2003","journal-title":"Hum Commun Res"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/19312450701641383"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0021-9010.85.1.112"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_23_1","first-page":"1","article-title":"A comparison of two approaches to correction of restriction of range in correlation analysis","volume":"14","author":"Wiberg M","year":"2009","journal-title":"Pract Assess Res Eval"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4135\/9781412983433"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.112.1.155"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_26_1","first-page":"26","volume-title":"Testing and Assessment: An Employer's Guide to Good Practices","author":"Department of Labor EaTAU","year":"1999"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7407.139"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/01421590903095510"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6920-8-16"}],"container-title":["Medical Education"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fmedu.12193","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/medu.12193","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,4]],"date-time":"2025-11-04T18:03:43Z","timestamp":1762279423000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/medu.12193"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,6,9]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/medu.12193"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/medu.12193","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0308-0110","1365-2923"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0308-0110","type":"print"},{"value":"1365-2923","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,6,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2012-08-12","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2013-02-04","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2013-06-09","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}