{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T08:40:30Z","timestamp":1780476030096,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,3]],"date-time":"2017-07-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1499040000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004572","name":"National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People's Republic of China","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["200802056"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["200802056"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004572","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Orthod Craniofacial Res"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]},"abstract":"Structured Abstract<\/jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>To assess the validity of the American Board of Orthodontics Discrepancy Index (ABO<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010DI<\/jats:styled-content>) and Peer Assessment Rating (PAR<\/jats:styled-content>) Index in evaluating malocclusion severity in Chinese orthodontic patients.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Setting and Sample Population<\/jats:title>A stratified random sample of 120 orthodontic patients based on Angle classification was collected from six university orthodontic centres.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Material and Methods<\/jats:title>Sixty\u2010nine orthodontists rated malocclusion severity on a five\u2010point scale by assessing a full set of pre\u2010treatment records for each case and listed reasons for their decision. Their judgement was then compared with ABO<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010DI<\/jats:styled-content> and PAR<\/jats:styled-content> scores determined by three calibrated examiners.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Results<\/jats:title>Excellent interexaminer reliability of clinician judgement, ABO<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010DI<\/jats:styled-content> and PAR<\/jats:styled-content> index was demonstrated by the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (rho= 0.995, 0.990 and 0.964, respectively). Both the ABO<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010DI<\/jats:styled-content> and US<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010PAR<\/jats:styled-content> index showed good correlation with clinician judgement (r<\/jats:italic>=.700 and r<\/jats:italic>=.707, respectively). There was variability among the different Angle classifications: the ABO<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010DI<\/jats:styled-content> showed the highest correlation with clinician judgement in Class II<\/jats:styled-content> patients (r<\/jats:italic>=.780), whereas the US<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010PAR<\/jats:styled-content> index showed the highest correlation with clinician judgement in Class III<\/jats:styled-content> patients (r<\/jats:italic>=.710). Both indices demonstrated the lowest correlations with clinician judgement in Class I patients.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>Conclusion<\/jats:title>With strong interexaminer agreement, the panel consensus was used for validating the ABO<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010DI<\/jats:styled-content> and US<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010PAR<\/jats:styled-content> index for malocclusion severity. Overall, the ABO<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010DI<\/jats:styled-content> and US<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010PAR<\/jats:styled-content> index were reliable for measuring malocclusion severity with significantly variable weightings for different Angle classifications. Further modification of the indices for different Angle classification may be indicated.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/ocr.12195","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,3]],"date-time":"2017-07-03T08:38:46Z","timestamp":1499071126000},"page":"140-145","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Validity of the American Board of Orthodontics Discrepancy Index and the Peer Assessment Rating Index for comprehensive evaluation of malocclusion severity"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"20","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7002-6829","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"S.","family":"Liu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"First Clinical Division Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology Beijing China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"H.","family":"Oh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthodontics University of the Pacific, Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry San Francisco CA USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"D. W.","family":"Chambers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Dental Practice University of the Pacific, Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry San Francisco CA USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S.","family":"Baumrind","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthodontics Craniofacial Research Instrumentation Laboratory University of the Pacific, Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry San Francisco CA USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"T.","family":"Xu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthodontics Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology Beijing China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9416(71)90002-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/14.2.125"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2004.01.005"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/14.3.180"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0889-5406(95)70133-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2006.05.008"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1126\/science.176.4036.785"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0889-5406(96)70121-X"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mod.2002.128465"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/cjn059"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_1","first-page":"259","article-title":"The significance of cephalometrics in treatment planning","volume":"49","author":"Silling G","year":"1979","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mod.2001.116825"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/2196-1042-14-47"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2010.09.003"}],"container-title":["Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Focr.12195","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/ocr.12195","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,2]],"date-time":"2023-10-02T20:40:56Z","timestamp":1696279256000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/ocr.12195"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,3]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/ocr.12195"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ocr.12195","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1601-6335","1601-6343"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1601-6335","type":"print"},{"value":"1601-6343","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,3]]}}}