{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,21]],"date-time":"2026-06-21T14:19:23Z","timestamp":1782051563953,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,17]],"date-time":"2012-12-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1355702400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Ophthalmic Physiologic Optic"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,1]]},"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>\n \n Purpose<\/jats:title>\n \n To evaluate and compare the visual performance of two simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses (\n CL<\/jats:styled-content>\n s).\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Methods<\/jats:title>\n \n In this cross\u2010over study design 20 presbyopic subjects were fitted with two different simultaneous vision multifocal\n CL<\/jats:styled-content>\n s (the\n P<\/jats:styled-content>\n ure\n V<\/jats:styled-content>\n ision\n M<\/jats:styled-content>\n ultifocal\n L<\/jats:styled-content>\n ow\n A<\/jats:styled-content>\n dd and\n A<\/jats:styled-content>\n cuvue\n O<\/jats:styled-content>\n asys for\n P<\/jats:styled-content>\n resbyopia) in random order. After 1\u00a0month, binocular distance visual acuity (\n BDVA<\/jats:styled-content>\n ) under photopic (85\u00a0cd\/m\n 2<\/jats:sup>\n ) and mesopic (3\u00a0cd\/m\n 2<\/jats:sup>\n ) conditions, binocular near visual acuity (\n BNVA<\/jats:styled-content>\n ), binocular distance contrast sensitivity function (\n CSF<\/jats:styled-content>\n ) under photopic and mesopic conditions, binocular near\n CSF<\/jats:styled-content>\n and defocus curve were measured. Subjects were then refitted with the alternative correction and the procedure was repeated.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n \n Mean\n BDVA<\/jats:styled-content>\n under photopic conditions was similar for the\n A<\/jats:styled-content>\n cuvue\n O<\/jats:styled-content>\n asys for\n P<\/jats:styled-content>\n resbyopia and\n P<\/jats:styled-content>\n ure\n V<\/jats:styled-content>\n ision\n M<\/jats:styled-content>\n ultifocal\n L<\/jats:styled-content>\n ow\n A<\/jats:styled-content>\n dd: 0.01\u00a0\u00b1\u00a00.08 and 0.00\u00a0\u00b1\u00a00.08 log\n MAR<\/jats:styled-content>\n , respectively (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n \u00a0=\u00a00.45). Under mesopic conditions the values of\n BDVA<\/jats:styled-content>\n were 0.20\u00a0\u00b1\u00a00.58 and 0.11\u00a0\u00b1\u00a00.09 log\n MAR<\/jats:styled-content>\n , respectively (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n \u00a0=\u00a00.005). Mean\n BNVA<\/jats:styled-content>\n was 0.20\u00a0\u00b1\u00a00.05 and 0.15\u00a0\u00b1\u00a00.08 log\n MAR<\/jats:styled-content>\n for the\n A<\/jats:styled-content>\n cuvue\n O<\/jats:styled-content>\n asys and\n P<\/jats:styled-content>\n ure\n V<\/jats:styled-content>\n ision\n L<\/jats:styled-content>\n ow\n A<\/jats:styled-content>\n dd, respectively (\n P<\/jats:italic>\n \u00a0=\u00a00.06). Binocular distance\n CSF<\/jats:styled-content>\n testing revealed no statistically significant differences between lenses under photopic, mesopic or near conditions. Both lenses provided a comparable intermediate visual acuity.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n \n Both simultaneous vision multifocal\n CL<\/jats:styled-content>\n s provided adequate distance visual quality under photopic and mesopic conditions, and better visual acuity was provided under mesopic conditions for the\n P<\/jats:styled-content>\n urevision lens. Both lenses provided adequate visual performance at intermediate distance, but the near visual acuity appears to be insufficient for early presbyopes who require a moderately demanding near visual quality.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/opo.12008","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,18]],"date-time":"2012-12-18T12:29:00Z","timestamp":1355833740000},"page":"51-56","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":40,"title":["Visual performance of two simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"33","author":[{"given":"David","family":"Madrid\u2010Costa","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Optometry Research Group Optics Department University of Valencia Valencia Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Santiago","family":"Garc\u00eda\u2010L\u00e1zaro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Optometry Research Group Optics Department University of Valencia Valencia Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"C\u00e9sar","family":"Albarr\u00e1n\u2010Diego","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Optometry Research Group Optics Department University of Valencia Valencia Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Teresa","family":"Ferrer\u2010Blasco","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Optometry Research Group Optics Department University of Valencia Valencia Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Robert","family":"Mont\u00e9s\u2010Mic\u00f3","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Optometry Research Group Optics Department University of Valencia Valencia Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_7_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2011.11.042"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0b013e31825da324"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1444-0938.2010.00524.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_5_1","first-page":"333","volume-title":"Clinical Refraction","author":"Borish IM","year":"1970"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_6_1","first-page":"468","article-title":"A critical review of presbyopic add determination","volume":"38","author":"Hanlon SD","year":"1987","journal-title":"J Am Optom Assoc"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_7_1","first-page":"73","article-title":"A comparison of three methods for determining the reading addition","volume":"36","author":"Woo GC","year":"1979","journal-title":"Am J Optom Pnysiol Opt"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_8_1","first-page":"334","article-title":"Fluctuation in visual acuity during soft toric contact lens wear","volume":"8","author":"Chamberlain P","year":"2011","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1444-0938.2002.tb03033.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clae.2007.02.005"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.opx.0000216098.62165.34"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0b013e318194eb18"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0b013e3181eb98b9"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1444-0938.2010.00530.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0892-8967(00)00029-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_16_1","first-page":"88","article-title":"Visual performance of a multizone bifocal and a progressive multifocal contact lens","volume":"28","author":"Guillon M","year":"2002","journal-title":"CLAO J"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_17_1","first-page":"34","article-title":"Visual performance with simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses","volume":"93","author":"Llorente\u2010Guillemot A","year":"2012","journal-title":"Clin Exp Optom"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1444-0938.2010.00518.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(03)00862-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"646","DOI":"10.3928\/1081-597X-20011101-03","article-title":"Choice of spatial frequency for contrast sensitivity evaluation after corneal refractive surgery","volume":"17","author":"Mont\u00e9s\u2010Mic\u00f3 R","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.88.1.11"},{"key":"e_1_2_7_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2009.11.018"}],"container-title":["Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fopo.12008","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/opo.12008","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,7]],"date-time":"2026-01-07T11:23:34Z","timestamp":1767785014000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/opo.12008"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,17]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/opo.12008"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/opo.12008","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0275-5408","1475-1313"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0275-5408","type":"print"},{"value":"1475-1313","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,17]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2012-05-23","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2012-11-07","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2012-12-17","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}