{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T01:17:51Z","timestamp":1787015871734,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,2,13]],"date-time":"2013-02-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1360713600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Ophthalmic Physiologic Optic"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,3]]},"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>\n \n Purpose<\/jats:title>\n To evaluate the ease with which astigmats from three groups of current non\u2010wearers of toric contact lenses can be fitted with current toric soft lenses, and to determine toric lens\u2010wearing success.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Methods<\/jats:title>\n \n This was a 1\u2010month, randomized, bilateral, open\u2010label, daily wear study involving 200 subjects and 16 investigational sites in the\n UK<\/jats:styled-content>\n . Three groups of astigmatic subjects aged from 16 to 60 and with a mean age of 36\u00a0years (67 spherical soft contact lens users,\n SW<\/jats:styled-content>\n ; 72 contact lens drop\u2010outs,\n DO<\/jats:styled-content>\n ; and 61 neophytes, Neo) were fitted with one of two toric soft lens types: a daily disposable toric soft lens (1\u00a0Day Acuvue Moist for Astigmatism, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care) or a 2\u2010weekly replacement, re\u2010usable toric soft lens (Acuvue Oasys for Astigmatism, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care). Subjects were evaluated after 1\u00a0month of wear and success rates calculated according to pre\u2010set criteria for acceptable fit, orientation stability, visual acuity, quality of vision, and overall comfort.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n \n Eighty\u2010eight percent of lenses were fitted at the first attempt. Of 198 subjects dispensed with lenses, 182 (92%) completed the study. When analysed by subject group, the success rates according to the pre\u2010set criteria were 80% (53\/66), 74% (52\/70), and 70% (39\/56) for the\n SW<\/jats:styled-content>\n ,\n DO<\/jats:styled-content>\n and Neo groups respectively. Comfort was the most common reason for failure with all three groups; however, visual problems were more common in the\n DO<\/jats:styled-content>\n and Neo groups (13% vs 6%).\n VA<\/jats:styled-content>\n with the study lenses was significantly better in the\n SW<\/jats:styled-content>\n group compared to their habitual lenses. For the\n DO<\/jats:styled-content>\n and Neo groups combined (i.e. spectacle wearers), visual acuity was comparable to their habitual spectacles.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n A high proportion of astigmats who are not using toric soft contact lenses can be fitted with current lenses. Previous contact lens drop\u2010outs and neophyte wearers achieve visual acuity comparable to spectacles when fitted with toric soft lenses. Spherical contact lens wearing astigmats achieve superior visual acuity when refitted with toric soft lenses. These findings suggest that many astigmats who are not currently using toric soft contact lenses could do so successfully.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/opo.12028","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,2,13]],"date-time":"2013-02-13T22:26:23Z","timestamp":1360794383000},"page":"94-103","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":30,"title":["Clinical evaluation of fitting toric soft contact lenses to current non\u2010users"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"33","author":[{"given":"Anna","family":"Sulley","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Wokingham UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Graeme","family":"Young","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Visioncare Research Ltd. Farnham UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kathrine Osborn","family":"Lorenz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Jacksonville USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chris","family":"Hunt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Visioncare Research Ltd. Farnham UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,2,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clae.2008.10.006"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/ICL.0b013e3182048fb9"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_4_1","first-page":"26","article-title":"International contact lens prescribing in 2011","volume":"27","author":"Morgan PB","year":"2012","journal-title":"Contact Lens Spectrum"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1475-1313.2002.00066.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clae.2004.02.006"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_7_1","first-page":"37","article-title":"New data on contact lens dropouts: an international perspective","volume":"147","author":"Rumpakis J","year":"2010","journal-title":"Rev Optom"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ico.0000248382.32143.86"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0b013e318159aa3e"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0b013e3181bc63b4"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clae.2009.08.003"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00006324-199604000-00006"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00006324-200201000-00008"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_14_1","first-page":"863","volume-title":"Contact Lenses","author":"CCLRU","year":"1997"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_15_1","first-page":"2110","article-title":"A retrospective study of myopia progression in adult contact lens wearers","volume":"43","author":"Bullimore MA","year":"2002","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0892-8967(01)00040-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.07-0511"}],"container-title":["Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fopo.12028","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/opo.12028","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,7]],"date-time":"2026-01-07T11:23:38Z","timestamp":1767785018000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/opo.12028"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,2,13]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/opo.12028"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/opo.12028","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0275-5408","1475-1313"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0275-5408","type":"print"},{"value":"1475-1313","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,2,13]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2011-11-07","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2013-01-03","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2013-02-13","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}