{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,19]],"date-time":"2026-09-19T16:11:42Z","timestamp":1789834302403,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,12,29]],"date-time":"2016-12-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1482969600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":58,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Orthopaedic Surgery"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Controversy remains over whether anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ACDF<\/jats:styled-content>) or posterior cervical foraminotomy (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCF<\/jats:styled-content>) is superior for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. We therefore performed a systematic review including three prospective randomized controlled trails (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">RCT<\/jats:styled-content>) and seven retrospective comparative studies <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">(RC<\/jats:styled-content>o<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">S<\/jats:styled-content>) by searching <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">P<\/jats:styled-content>ub<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">M<\/jats:styled-content>ed and <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">EMBASE<\/jats:styled-content>. These studies were assessed on risk of bias according to the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">C<\/jats:styled-content>ochrane <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">H<\/jats:styled-content>andbook for <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">S<\/jats:styled-content>ystematic <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">R<\/jats:styled-content>eviews of Interventions, and the quality of evidence and level of recommendation were evaluated according to the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">GRADE<\/jats:styled-content> approach. Clinical outcomes, complications, reoperation rates, radiological parameters, and cost\/cost\u2010utility were evaluated. The mean complication rate was 7% in the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ACDF<\/jats:styled-content> group and 4% in the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCF<\/jats:styled-content> group, and the mean reoperation rate was 4% in the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ACDF<\/jats:styled-content> group and 6% in the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCF<\/jats:styled-content> group within 2\u2009years of the initial surgery. There was a strong level of recommendation that no difference existed in clinical outcome, complication rate and reoperation rate between the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ACDF<\/jats:styled-content> and the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCF<\/jats:styled-content> group. There was conflicting evidence that the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ACDF<\/jats:styled-content> group had better clinical outcomes than the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCF<\/jats:styled-content> group (one study with weak level of recommendation). <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCF<\/jats:styled-content> could preserve the range of motion (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ROM<\/jats:styled-content>) of the operated segment but did not increase the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ROM<\/jats:styled-content> of the adjacent segment (weak level of recommendation). Meanwhile, the average cost or cost\u2010utility of the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCF<\/jats:styled-content> group was significantly lower than that of the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ACDF<\/jats:styled-content> group (weak level of recommendation). In conclusion, the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCF<\/jats:styled-content> was just as safe and effective as the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ACDF<\/jats:styled-content> in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. Meanwhile, <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCF<\/jats:styled-content> might have lower medical cost than <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ACDF<\/jats:styled-content> and decrease the incidence of adjacent segment disease. Based on the available evidence, <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PCF<\/jats:styled-content> appears to be another good surgical approach in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/os.12285","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,12,29]],"date-time":"2016-12-29T12:40:27Z","timestamp":1483015227000},"page":"425-431","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":94,"title":["Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion versus Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy in the Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy: <scp>A<\/scp> Systematic Review"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"Wei\u2010jun","family":"Liu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedics, Pu Ai Hospital, Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology  Wuhan China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ling","family":"Hu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesiology, Tianyou Hospital Wuhan University of Science and Technology  Wuhan China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Po\u2010Hsin","family":"Chou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General, Hospital School of Medicine National Yang\u2010Ming University  Taipei Taiwan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jun\u2010wen","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedics, Pu Ai Hospital, Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology  Wuhan China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wu\u2010sheng","family":"Kan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedics, Pu Ai Hospital, Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology  Wuhan China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,12,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11420-011-9218-z"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2147\/TCRM.S92511"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2015.02.026"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00701-015-2491-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1749-799X-9-38"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318154c57e"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31816c8b67"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-198701000-00002"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199812150-00014"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0404.1987.tb03556.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2015.01.021"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.05.042"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000217604.02663.59"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.39489.470347.AD"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199015100-00009"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0090-3019(00)00201-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3171\/2010.1.FOCUS09305"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E67","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000099","article-title":"Cost\u2010utility analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plating (ACDFP) versus posterior cervical Foraminotomy (PCF) for patients with single\u2010level cervical radiculopathy at 1\u2010year follow\u2010up","volume":"29","author":"Alvin MD","year":"2016","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.14245\/kjs.2014.11.1.1"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.8.FOCUS14373"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0034-1395423"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3340\/jkns.2014.56.3.224"}],"container-title":["Orthopaedic Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fos.12285","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fos.12285","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/os.12285","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,26]],"date-time":"2023-09-26T05:53:27Z","timestamp":1695707607000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/os.12285"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/os.12285"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/os.12285","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1757-7853","1757-7861"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1757-7853","type":"print"},{"value":"1757-7861","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]}}}