{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T15:13:07Z","timestamp":1791385987366,"version":"4.3.3"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,27]],"date-time":"2017-09-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1506470400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":57,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Orthopaedic Surgery"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate the influence of <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">S<\/jats:styled-content>coliosis <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">R<\/jats:styled-content>esearch <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">S<\/jats:styled-content>ociety <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">(SRS)<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">S<\/jats:styled-content>chwab sagittal modifiers of pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PI\u2010LL<\/jats:styled-content>) on clinical outcomes for adult degenerative scoliosis (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ADS<\/jats:styled-content>) after long posterior instrumentation and fusion.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>This was a single\u2010institute, retrospective study. From 2012 to 2014, 44 patients with <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ADS<\/jats:styled-content> who underwent posterior instrumentation and fusion treatment were reviewed. Radiological evaluations were investigated by standing whole spine (posteroanterior and lateral views) <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">X<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010ray and all radiological measurements, including <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">C<\/jats:styled-content>obb\u2019s angle, <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">LL<\/jats:styled-content>, <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PI<\/jats:styled-content>, and the grading of vertebral rotation, were performed by two experienced surgeons who were blind to the operations. The patients were divided into three groups based on postoperative <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PI\u2010LL<\/jats:styled-content> and the classification of the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SRS<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">S<\/jats:styled-content>chwab: 0 grade <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PI\u2010LL<\/jats:styled-content> (&lt;10\u00b0, <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u200913); + grade <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PI\u2010LL<\/jats:styled-content> (10\u00b0\u201320\u00b0, <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u200919); and ++ grade <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PI\u2010LL<\/jats:styled-content> (&gt;20\u00b0, <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u200912). The clinical outcomes were assessed according to <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">J<\/jats:styled-content>apanese <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">O<\/jats:styled-content>rthopaedic <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">A<\/jats:styled-content>ssociation (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">JOA<\/jats:styled-content>) score, <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">O<\/jats:styled-content>swestry <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">D<\/jats:styled-content>isability <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">I<\/jats:styled-content>ndex (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ODI<\/jats:styled-content>), <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">V<\/jats:styled-content>isual <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">A<\/jats:styled-content>nalog <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">S<\/jats:styled-content>cale (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">VAS<\/jats:styled-content>), <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">L<\/jats:styled-content>umbar <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">S<\/jats:styled-content>tiffness <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">D<\/jats:styled-content>isability <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">I<\/jats:styled-content>ndex (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">LSDI<\/jats:styled-content>), and complications. Other characteristic data of patients were also collected, including intraoperative blood loss, operative time, length of hospital stay, complications, number of fusion levels, and number of decompressions.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The mean operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were 284.5\u2009\u00b1\u200930.2\u2009min, 1040.5\u2009\u00b1\u20091207.6\u2009mL, and 14.5\u2009\u00b1\u20091.9\u2009day. At the last follow\u2010up (2.6\u2009\u00b1\u20090.6\u2009years), the radiological and functional parameters, except the grading of vertebral rotation, were all significantly improved in comparison with preoperative results (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.05), but it was obvious that an ideal <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PI\u2010LL<\/jats:styled-content> (\u226410\u00b0) was not achieved in some patients. Significant differences were only observed among the three groups in the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ODI<\/jats:styled-content> and <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">LSDI<\/jats:styled-content>. Patients with + grade <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PI\u2010LL<\/jats:styled-content> seemed to have the best surgical outcome compared to those with 0 and ++ grade <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PI\u2010LL<\/jats:styled-content>, with the lowest <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ODI<\/jats:styled-content> score (+ grade <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic> 0 grade, 17.3\u2009\u00b1\u20094.9 <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic> 26.0\u2009\u00b1\u20095.4; + grade <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic> ++ grade, 17.3\u2009\u00b1\u20094.9 <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic> 32.4\u2009\u00b1\u20097.3; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.05) and lower <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">LSDI<\/jats:styled-content> (+ grade <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic> 0 grade, 1.6\u2009\u00b1\u20091.0 <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic> 3.5\u2009\u00b1\u20090.5, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.05; + grade <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic> ++ grade, 1.6\u2009\u00b1\u20091.0 <jats:italic>vs<\/jats:italic> 0.6\u2009\u00b1\u20090.5, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&gt;\u20090.05). A <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">P<\/jats:styled-content>earson correlation analysis further demonstrated that <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">LSDI<\/jats:styled-content> was negatively associated with <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PI\u2010LL<\/jats:styled-content>. Furthermore, the incidence rate of postoperative complications was lower in patients with + grade <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PI\u2010LL<\/jats:styled-content> (1\/19, 5.26%) than that in patients with 0 (2\/13, 15.4%) and ++ grade <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PI\u2010LL<\/jats:styled-content> (3\/12, 25%).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Our present study suggest that the ideal <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PI\u2010LL<\/jats:styled-content> may be between 10\u00b0 and 20\u00b0 in <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">ADS<\/jats:styled-content> patients after long posterior instrumentation and fusion.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/os.12343","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,29]],"date-time":"2017-09-29T15:05:24Z","timestamp":1506697524000},"page":"304-310","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":28,"title":["Optimal Pelvic Incidence Minus Lumbar Lordosis Mismatch after Long Posterior Instrumentation and Fusion for Adult Degenerative Scoliosis"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"Hao\u2010cong","family":"Zhang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedics The General Hospital of Chinese PLA  Beijing China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zi\u2010fang","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedics The General Hospital of Chinese PLA  Beijing China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zhao\u2010han","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedics The General Hospital of Chinese PLA  Beijing China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jun\u2010yao","family":"Cheng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedics The General Hospital of Chinese PLA  Beijing China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yun\u2010chang","family":"Wu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedics The General Hospital of Chinese PLA  Beijing China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yi\u2010ming","family":"Fan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedics The General Hospital of Chinese PLA  Beijing China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tian\u2010hao","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedics The General Hospital of Chinese PLA  Beijing China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zheng","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedics The General Hospital of Chinese PLA  Beijing China"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_6_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-196951030-00002"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000194777.87055.1b"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-014-3542-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4184\/asj.2014.8.3.371"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199912150-00009"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000234732.43489.0f"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.3928\/0147-7447-20000301-21","article-title":"Indications for instrumentation in degenerative lumbar spinal disorders","volume":"23","author":"Vaccaro AR","year":"2000","journal-title":"Orthopedics"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-008-0615-z"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199707150-00013"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181ce63a2"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000155425.04536.f7"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000179086.30449.96"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2176\/nmc.oa.2014-0026"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318292b7b9"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31829ec563"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s005860050038"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-014-3653-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181ee6bd4"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31823e15e2"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-014-3454-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1748-7161-10-S2-S17"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-016-4563-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-196951020-00002"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-015-0676-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001229"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001171"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000871"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-016-4411-x"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000022"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001090"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000968"},{"key":"e_1_2_6_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000246"}],"container-title":["Orthopaedic Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fos.12343","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/os.12343","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,5]],"date-time":"2023-10-05T01:49:16Z","timestamp":1696470556000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/os.12343"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/os.12343"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/os.12343","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1757-7853","1757-7861"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1757-7853","type":"print"},{"value":"1757-7861","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,8]]}}}