{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,5]],"date-time":"2026-10-05T08:05:56Z","timestamp":1791187556937,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,13]],"date-time":"2012-12-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1355356800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Psychophysiology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>The feedback negativity (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">FN<\/jats:styled-content>) has been shown to reflect the binary evaluation of possible outcomes in a context\u2010dependent manner, but it is unclear whether context dependence is based on global or local alternatives. A cued gambling task was used to examine whether the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">FN<\/jats:styled-content> is sensitive to possible outcomes on a given trial, or the range of outcomes across trials. On 50% of trials, participants could break even or lose money; on remaining trials, participants could win or break even. Breaking even was an unfavorable outcome relative to all possibilities in the current task, but the best possible outcome on 50% of trials. Results indicated that breaking even elicited an <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">FN<\/jats:styled-content> in both contexts, and reward feedback was uniquely associated with an enhanced positivity. Results suggest that the magnitude of the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">FN<\/jats:styled-content> depends on all possible outcomes within the current task and are consistent with the view that the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">FN<\/jats:styled-content> reflects reward\u2010related neural activity.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1111\/psyp.12002","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,13]],"date-time":"2012-12-13T20:28:38Z","timestamp":1355430518000},"page":"134-138","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":76,"title":["The feedback negativity reflects favorable compared to nonfavorable outcomes based on global, not local, alternatives"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"50","author":[{"given":"Autumn","family":"Kujawa","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychology Stony Brook University Stony Brook  New York USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ezra","family":"Smith","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychology University of Arizona  Tucson Arizona USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christian","family":"Luhmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychology Stony Brook University Stony Brook  New York USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Greg","family":"Hajcak","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychology Stony Brook University Stony Brook  New York USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_5_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuroimage.2011.05.037"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/hbm.21182"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1126\/science.1066893"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0013\u20104694(83)90135\u20109"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1469\u20108986.2005.00278.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.biopsycho.2005.04.001"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.brainres.2005.12.015"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1469\u20108986.2004.00152.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.wnr.0000099601.41403.a5"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1469\u20108986.2008.00668.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1469\u20108986.2011.01291.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1467\u20109280.01417"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1162\/jocn.1997.9.6.788"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuroimage.2004.12.043"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neubiorev.2004.05.003"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00001756-200503150-00020"},{"key":"e_1_2_5_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1523\/jneurosci.4537\u201003.2004"}],"container-title":["Psychophysiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fpsyp.12002","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/psyp.12002","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,30]],"date-time":"2023-10-30T14:48:08Z","timestamp":1698677288000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/psyp.12002"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,13]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,2]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/psyp.12002"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/psyp.12002","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0048-5772","1469-8986"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0048-5772","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-8986","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,12,13]]}}}