{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T07:52:36Z","timestamp":1740124356118,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,23]],"date-time":"2018-02-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1519344000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001322","name":"South African Medical Research Council","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001322","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Skin Research and Technology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background<\/jats:title><jats:p>Observing accurate real\u2010time measurements of solar ultraviolet radiation (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UVR<\/jats:styled-content>) levels is important since personal excess sun exposure is associated with skin cancers. Handheld measurement devices may be helpful but their accuracy is unknown. We compare a portable, science\u2010grade solar <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UVR<\/jats:styled-content> monitoring device against two fixed, science\u2010grade solar <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UVR<\/jats:styled-content> instruments.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>Instruments were (1) a fixed Solar Light 501 <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UV<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010B biometer to measure <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UV<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010B; (2) a fixed Kipp and Zonen radiometer used to measure <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UV<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010A and <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UV<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010B; and (3) Goldilux ultraviolet probes which are commercially available portable devices. Two different probes were used, one measured <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UV<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010A and the other <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UV<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010B radiation. The Goldilux probes were levelled and secured next to the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UV<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010B biometer. Between 10:00 and 14:40 <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UTC<\/jats:styled-content>+2, the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UV<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010B biometer was set to record at 10\u2010minute intervals and measurements by the Goldilux probes were manually taken simultaneously. Results were compared for all data and by solar zenith angle (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SZA<\/jats:styled-content>) ranges.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The Goldilux <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UV<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010B probe measured <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UV<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010B relatively well in its diurnal pattern, however, its readings were ~77% higher than those made by the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UV<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010B biometer. While <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UV<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010A measurements from the Goldilux <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UV<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010A probe and those from the radiometer were in relatively good agreement in pattern, the radiometer read ~47% higher than the Goldilux <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UV<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010A probe. <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UV<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010B data from Goldilux <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UV<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010B probe had a moderately strong correlation with <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UV<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010B biometer data for small <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SZA<\/jats:styled-content>s; conversely, for <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UV<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010A, the Goldilux <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UV<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010A probe had a strong correlation with the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UV<\/jats:styled-content>\u2010A radiometer data for large <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SZA<\/jats:styled-content>s.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Handheld devices may be useful to provide real\u2010time readings of solar <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UVR<\/jats:styled-content> patterns, however, to achieve synchronicity in the magnitude of readings to those made by science\u2010grade fixed instruments, devices may need to be used during certain times of the day and in clear\u2010sky conditions which may not be practical in personal exposure studies.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/srt.12462","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,23]],"date-time":"2018-02-23T08:48:40Z","timestamp":1519375720000},"page":"527-534","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Assessing a portable, real\u2010time display handheld meter with <scp>UV<\/scp>\u2010A and <scp>UV<\/scp>\u2010B sensors for potential application in personal sun exposure studies"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"24","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1546-9138","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"D. J.","family":"du Preez","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Geography, Geoinformatics and Meteorology University of Pretoria  Pretoria South Africa"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J. L.","family":"du Plessis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Occupational Hygiene and Health Research Initiative University of the North\u2010West  Potchefstroom South Africa"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"C. Y.","family":"Wright","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Geography, Geoinformatics and Meteorology University of Pretoria  Pretoria South Africa"},{"name":"Environment and Health Research Unit South African Medical Research Council  Pretoria South Africa"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_10_2_1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Solar and Ultraviolet Radiation","volume":"55","author":"IARC","year":"1992","journal-title":"IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mjd.2001.114594"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0300-483X(03)00150-1"},{"volume-title":"Solar Ultraviolet Radiation: Global Burden of Disease from Solar Ultraviolet Radiation","year":"2006","author":"Lucas R.","key":"e_1_2_10_5_1"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1751-1097.2004.tb00028.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1562\/2006-08-22-RA-1010"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1562\/0031-8655(2000)0710060CBRAMU2.0.CO2"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2133.1996.d01-896.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1751-1097.2009.00612.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/jes.2016.51"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_12_1","unstructured":"WrightCY GriffithD.Solar UVR instrument inter\u2010comparison focusing on measurement interval recording setting and solar zenith angle as important factors. South Africa Society of Atmospheric Science Conference 2015 21\u201022 September 2015 Centurion Pretoria."},{"key":"e_1_2_10_13_1","unstructured":"Solar Light. Model 501 UV Biometer Radiometer. Available online atwww.solarlight.com. 2014. Accessed March 6 2017."},{"key":"e_1_2_10_14_1","unstructured":"Kipp and Zonen.UVS\u2010AB\u2010T Radiometer Kipp and Zonen. Available athttp:\/\/www.kippzonen.com\/Product\/30\/UVS-AB-T-UV-Radiometer#.WL5mjDt9601. Accessed March 7 2017."},{"key":"e_1_2_10_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2987937"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_16_1","first-page":"138","volume-title":"Contemporary Business Statistics","author":"Williams TA","year":"2009"},{"key":"e_1_2_10_17_1","unstructured":"World Health Organization.Global Solar UV Index: A Practical Guide. Geneva; World Health Organization and International Commission on Non\u2010Ionizing Radiation Protection. Geneva Switzerland."}],"container-title":["Skin Research and Technology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fsrt.12462","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/srt.12462","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,16]],"date-time":"2023-09-16T23:11:59Z","timestamp":1694905919000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/srt.12462"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,23]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,11]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/srt.12462"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/srt.12462","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0909-752X","1600-0846"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0909-752X"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1600-0846"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,23]]}}}