{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,8]],"date-time":"2026-03-08T23:01:08Z","timestamp":1773010868654,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":6,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,3,28]],"date-time":"2014-03-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1395964800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Transfusion"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Background<\/jats:title><jats:p>The utility of a hemovigilance system depends on appropriate, reproducible application of system definitions. This is even more important when submissions are not reviewed by an adjudicating body. We sought to determine how participants would code adverse reactions at institutions that had or had not received training on the application of definitions used in the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CDC<\/jats:styled-content>'s <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">N<\/jats:styled-content>ational <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">H<\/jats:styled-content>ealthcare <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">S<\/jats:styled-content>afety <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">N<\/jats:styled-content>etwork <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">H<\/jats:styled-content>emovigilance <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">M<\/jats:styled-content>odule (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HVM<\/jats:styled-content>).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Study Design and Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>Facilities that were (11) or were not (11) submitting adverse reaction data to the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HVM<\/jats:styled-content> reviewed 36 hypothetical cases containing elements of 37 case definitions from 12 different diagnostic groups. Respondents were required to determine the type of adverse event, if any, and assign a case definition (diagnostic probability), severity, and imputability using the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">J<\/jats:styled-content>anuary 2013 <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HVM S<\/jats:styled-content>urveillance <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">P<\/jats:styled-content>rotocol definitions. Those submitting <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">HVM<\/jats:styled-content> data had access to an instructional slide set prepared by <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CDC<\/jats:styled-content> using similar hypothetical cases. Concordance with expert analysis was determined for the two groups of respondents.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The frequencies of agreement with the expert assessment were not different according to prior training exposure in any of the diagnostic groups, and results were totaled across both groups. Response accuracy varied by type of categorization (adverse event type, 72.1%; match with case definition, 76.5%; severity, 69.6%; imputablity, 64.4%) and by type of adverse event.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Despite delineated definitions, considerable variability in responses was seen, and this was not reduced by the available training. This degree of inconsistency in application of the surveillance definitions could degrade the utility of comparative reports.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/trf.12620","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,3,28]],"date-time":"2014-03-28T20:55:04Z","timestamp":1396040104000},"page":"2077-2083","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":20,"title":["<scp>AABB<\/scp> validation study of the <scp>CDC<\/scp>'s <scp>N<\/scp>ational <scp>H<\/scp>ealthcare <scp>S<\/scp>afety <scp>N<\/scp>etwork <scp>H<\/scp>emovigilance <scp>M<\/scp>odule adverse events definitions protocol"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"54","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7976-6871","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"James P.","family":"AuBuchon","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Puget Sound Blood Center  Seattle Washington"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mark","family":"Fung","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Fletcher Allen Health Care  Burlington Vermont"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Barbee","family":"Whitaker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Research and Data Analysis AABB  Bethesda Maryland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jacquelyn","family":"Malasky","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Research and Data Analysis AABB  Bethesda Maryland"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,3,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1423-0410.2006.00742.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_1","unstructured":"Serious Hazards of Transfusion Steering Committee.Annual reports from the United Kingdom's Serious Hazards of Transfusion hemovigilance system. [cited 2013 Oct 26]. Available from:http:\/\/www.shotuk.org"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1537-2995.2007.01281.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_5_1","first-page":"1A","article-title":"The Canadian transfusion error surveillance system (TESS): results from the first two years of a national pilot project","volume":"47","author":"Callum JL","year":"2007","journal-title":"Transfusion"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tmrv.2006.05.002"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2529310"}],"container-title":["Transfusion"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Ftrf.12620","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/trf.12620","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,1]],"date-time":"2023-10-01T10:12:11Z","timestamp":1696155131000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/trf.12620"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,3,28]]},"references-count":6,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/trf.12620"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/trf.12620","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0041-1132","1537-2995"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0041-1132","type":"print"},{"value":"1537-2995","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,3,28]]}}}