{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T08:26:47Z","timestamp":1740126407638,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,27]],"date-time":"2017-09-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1506470400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100006662","name":"National Institute on Handicapped Research","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["IS_BRC_0211_10025"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["IS_BRC_0211_10025"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100006662","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Vox Sanguinis"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Background and Objectives<\/jats:title><jats:p>Vital sign observations should be monitored before, during and after transfusion to enable adverse events to be identified, but surveys in the <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UK<\/jats:styled-content> show poor compliance with good practice. At the Oxford University Hospitals, there are two electronic bedside processes for recording observations; BloodTrack Tx (Haemonetics Corp.), the routine electronic transfusion process and a locally developed process, the System for Electronic Nursing Documentation (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SEND<\/jats:styled-content>) with integrated \u2018track and trigger\u2019 calculation for monitoring vital signs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the conduct of patient observation monitoring for blood transfusion using two electronic bedside processes.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Materials and Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>This study examined the observations recorded during 200 single red cell unit transfusions.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>186\/200 (93%) transfusions had pretransfusion observations recorded using BloodTrack Tx. Mid\u2010transfusion checks were performed during 133\/200 (67%) of transfusions, of these checks most (87\/200 (44%)) were documented as \u2018no apparent change\u2019 in observations. End transfusion observations were performed using BloodTrack Tx in 178\/200 (89%). Both systems were frequently used, and staff had a preference for using <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">SEND<\/jats:styled-content> first for documenting the pretransfusion observations (102\/116 (88%)) and at the end of a transfusion (75\/115 (65%)).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Electronic bedside systems result in improved monitoring of transfusion\u2010related observations compared to manual processes based on data from <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">UK<\/jats:styled-content> surveys. There is increasing use of electronic systems in clinical practice; linkage between these two systems would prevent wasteful duplication of observations and could provide improved early warning of adverse events to transfusion compared to manual processes.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1111\/vox.12569","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,27]],"date-time":"2017-09-27T07:19:05Z","timestamp":1506496745000},"page":"780-787","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Electronic recording of transfusion\u2010related patient observations: a comparison of two bedside systems"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"112","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8376-5564","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"S.","family":"Staples","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford University Hospitals University of Oxford Oxford UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"S.","family":"Noel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford University Hospitals University of Oxford Oxford UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"P.","family":"Watkinson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford University Hospitals University of Oxford Oxford UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M. F.","family":"Murphy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford University Hospitals University of Oxford Oxford UK"},{"name":"NHS Blood &amp; Transplant (NHSBT) Oxford UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_8_2_1","unstructured":"British Society for Haematology:Guideline on the Administration of Blood Components.2009http:\/\/www.b-s-h.org.uk\/media\/5152\/admin_blood_components-bcsh-05012010.pdf. [Last accessed 17 March 2017]"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_3_1","unstructured":"The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE):Blood transfusion \u2010 Guidance and guidelines.2015.https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/ng24. [Last accessed 27 March 2017]"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.h5832"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/tme.12380"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/trf.12454"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2147\/IJCTM.S40024"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/vox.12466"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1537-2995.2012.03595.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7748\/ns2013.06.27.43.41.e7067"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1537-2995.2003.00428.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1537-2995.2011.03509.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_13_1","unstructured":"The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE):Clinical guideline 50: acutely ill patients in hospital: recognition of and response to acute illness in adults in hospital.2007https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/cg50. [Last accessed 27 March 2017]"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.resuscitation.2011.03.006"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12911-015-0186-y"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjqs-2014-003073"},{"key":"e_1_2_8_17_1","unstructured":"Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT): The 2015 Annual SHOT Report 2016.http:\/\/www.shotuk.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/SHOT-2015-Annual-Report-Web-Edition-Final-bookmarked.pdf. [Last accessed 27 March 2017]"}],"container-title":["Vox Sanguinis"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1111%2Fvox.12569","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/vox.12569","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,29]],"date-time":"2023-09-29T22:31:16Z","timestamp":1696026676000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/vox.12569"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,27]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1111\/vox.12569"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/vox.12569","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0042-9007","1423-0410"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0042-9007"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1423-0410"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,27]]}}}