{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,6]],"date-time":"2026-10-06T21:08:08Z","timestamp":1791320888568,"version":"4.3.1"},"reference-count":84,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"12","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability, and rehabilitation, involving repetitive, high intensity, task-specific exercises, is the pathway to restoring motor skills. Robotic assistive devices are increasingly being used and it is hoped that with robotic devices, rehabilitation progress can be achieved for patients.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To examine the effectiveness of robotic devices in the rehabilitation of stroke patients for upper limb mobility, lower limb mobility, and activities of daily living. The sustainability of treatment effect was also examined.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Inclusion criteria Types of participants<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Adult stroke patients 18 years and over.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Types of intervention(s)<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Rehabilitation of stroke patients using robotic devices with assistive automation, compared to conventional physiotherapy.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Outcomes<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Motor movements of upper limbs, walking movement of lower limbs and activities of daily living, including follow-up measurements to examine the sustainability of treatment effect.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Types of studies<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Randomized and controlled clinical trials.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Search strategy<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Published and unpublished studies in English were searched.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methodological quality<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>All studies meeting the review inclusion criteria were independently assessed for methodological quality by two reviewers.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Data extraction<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Quantitative data were extracted using the standardized data extraction tool from the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Data synthesis<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Quantitative data were pooled in statistical meta-analysis. Effect sizes expressed as standardized mean difference, 95% confidence intervals and levels of heterogeneity (I\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      ) were calculated. Where statistical pooling was not possible, the findings were presented in narrative form.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Fifty-one studies with 1798 patients were included in this review. Thirty studies examined upper limb interventions and 21 studies evaluated lower limb gait training. Non-significant results were found for upper limb (SMD 0.07, 95% CI \u22120.11 to 0.26, I\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      \u200a=\u200a41%, P\u200a=\u200a0.45), lower limb (SMD 0.17, 95% CI \u22120.15 to 0.48, I\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      \u200a=\u200a75%, P\u200a=\u200a0.31) and activities of daily living (SMD 0.11, 95% CI \u22120.11 to 0.33, I\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      \u200a=\u200a66%, P\u200a=\u200a0.32). For patients with severely impaired lower limbs, a significant difference was observed in favor of robotics (SMD 0.41, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.63, I\n                      <jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\n                      \u200a=\u200a28%, P\u200a=\u200a0.0003). P-value analysis did not show significant results for the sustainability of treatment effect post intervention.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Robotic training is just as effective as conventional training for upper limb motor movement, lower limb walking mobility and for activities of daily living. For lower limb patients with severe impairment, robotic training produces better outcomes than conventional training. The sufficient quantity of studies included and the reasonable quality of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) evidence support the findings.<\/jats:p>\n                    <jats:p>For treatment sustainability of upper and lower limbs, robotic training is just as effective as conventional training. However, the low quality of GRADE evidence and the lower number of studies included require caution for this finding. For treatment sustainability of activities of daily living, the better quality of GRADE evidence and the larger number of studies analyzed indicate that robotic training is just as effective as conventional training.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.11124\/jbisrir-2017-003456","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,12,6]],"date-time":"2017-12-06T22:47:31Z","timestamp":1512600451000},"page":"3049-3091","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":93,"title":["Effectiveness of robotic assisted rehabilitation for mobility and functional ability in adult stroke patients: a systematic review"],"prefix":"10.11124","volume":"15","author":[{"given":"Kenneth","family":"Lo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matthew","family":"Stephenson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Craig","family":"Lockwood","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"issue":"7","key":"R4-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1522","DOI":"10.1161\/01.STR.28.7.1522","article-title":"Rehabilitation","volume":"28","author":"Gresham","year":"1997","journal-title":"Stroke"},{"issue":"8","key":"R5-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"833","DOI":"10.1191\/0269215504cr843oa","article-title":"The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence?","volume":"18","author":"Van Peppen","year":"2004","journal-title":"Clin Rehabil"},{"issue":"4","key":"R6-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006073.pub2","article-title":"Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke","author":"French","year":"2007","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"R7-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1177\/0888439003262876","article-title":"Stroke Rehabilitation Research: Time to Answer More Specific Questions?","volume":"18","author":"Whitall","year":"2004","journal-title":"Neurorehabil Neural Repair"},{"key":"R8-20230825","first-page":"13","article-title":"Rehabilitation with poststroke motor recovery: a review with a focus on neural plasticity","volume":"2013","author":"Takeuchi","year":"2013","journal-title":"Stroke Res Treat"},{"issue":"1","key":"R9-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1097\/MRR.0000000000000035","article-title":"Recent trends for practical rehabilitation robotics, current challenges and the future","volume":"37","author":"Yakub","year":"2014","journal-title":"Int J Rehabil Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"R10-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1586\/17434440.2014.882766","article-title":"The value of robotic systems in stroke rehabilitation","volume":"11","author":"Masiero","year":"2014","journal-title":"Expert Rev Med Devices"},{"issue":"6","key":"R11-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"705","DOI":"10.1097\/00019052-200312000-00010","article-title":"Upper and lower extremity robotic devices for rehabilitation and for studying motor control","volume":"16","author":"Hesse","year":"2003","journal-title":"Curr Opin Neurol"},{"issue":"1","key":"R12-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1177\/1545968308326632","article-title":"Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Lokomat in subacute stroke","volume":"23","author":"Hidler","year":"2009","journal-title":"Neurorehabil Neural Repair"},{"issue":"12","key":"R13-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2895","DOI":"10.1161\/01.STR.0000035734.61539.F6","article-title":"Treadmill training with partial body weight support and an electromechanical gait trainer for restoration of gait in subacute stroke patients: A randomized crossover study","volume":"33","author":"Werner","year":"2002","journal-title":"Stroke"},{"issue":"2","key":"R14-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1097\/MRR.0b013e32836195d1","article-title":"Robotics in rehabilitation: successes and expectations","volume":"36","author":"Fazekas","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int J Rehabil Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"R15-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"318","DOI":"10.1177\/1545968311408916","article-title":"Effects of robot-assisted gait training on cardiopulmonary fitness in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled study","volume":"26","author":"Chang","year":"2012","journal-title":"Neurorehabil Neural Repair"},{"issue":"6","key":"R16-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"981","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2014.10.022","article-title":"Comparison of robotics, functional electrical stimulation, and motor learning methods for treatment of persistent upper extremity dysfunction after stroke: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"96","author":"McCabe","year":"2015","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"issue":"19","key":"R17-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1772","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa0911341","article-title":"Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke","volume":"362","author":"Lo","year":"2010","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"30","key":"R18-20230825","first-page":"30","article-title":"Brain-computer interface-based robotic end effector system for wrist and hand rehabilitation: results of a three-armed randomized controlled trial for chronic stroke","volume":"7","author":"Ang","year":"2014","journal-title":"Front Neuroeng"},{"issue":"6","key":"R19-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1177\/0269215510389497","article-title":"Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted gait training in patients with chronic stroke: a preliminary comparison","volume":"25","author":"Geroin","year":"2011","journal-title":"Clin Rehabil"},{"issue":"5","key":"R20-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1037","DOI":"10.1007\/s00415-014-7345-4","article-title":"Sequential combination of robot-assisted therapy and constraint-induced therapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"261","author":"Hsieh","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Neurol"},{"issue":"8","key":"R21-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"686","DOI":"10.1177\/0269215511432356","article-title":"Effects of gait rehabilitation with a footpad-type locomotion interface in patients with chronic post-stroke hemiparesis: a pilot study","volume":"26","author":"Tanaka","year":"2012","journal-title":"Clin Rehabil"},{"issue":"4","key":"R22-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1177\/1545968313510974","article-title":"Robotic therapy provides a stimulus for upper limb motor recovery after stroke that is complementary to and distinct from conventional therapy","volume":"28","author":"Brokaw","year":"2014","journal-title":"Neurorehabil Neural Repair"},{"issue":"10","key":"R23-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"987","DOI":"10.2340\/16501977-1234","article-title":"Systematic review of outcome measures of walking training using electromechanical and robotic devices in patients with stroke","volume":"45","author":"Geroin","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Rehabil Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"R24-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-2-8","article-title":"Do multiple outcome measures require P-value adjustment?","volume":"2","author":"Feise","year":"2002","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"issue":"1","key":"R25-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.11124\/JBISRIR-2016-002957","article-title":"Effectiveness of Robotic Assisted Rehabilitation for Mobility and Functional Ability in Adult Stroke Patients: a systematic review protocol","volume":"15","author":"Lo","year":"2017","journal-title":"JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep"},{"issue":"7","key":"R27-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"576","DOI":"10.1136\/jnnp.53.7.576","article-title":"Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study","volume":"53","author":"Collin","year":"1990","journal-title":"J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry"},{"issue":"10","key":"R33-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1211","DOI":"10.1682\/JRRD.2010.10.0203","article-title":"Translating measurement findings into rehabilitation practice: An example using Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity with patients following stroke","volume":"48","author":"Velozo","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Rehabil Res Dev"},{"issue":"6","key":"R34-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"516","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pmrj.2009.03.009","article-title":"The effectiveness of locomotor therapy using robotic-assisted gait training in subacute stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial","volume":"1","author":"Schwartz","year":"2009","journal-title":"PM & R: the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation"},{"issue":"3","key":"R35-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"166","DOI":"10.2340\/16501977-0304","article-title":"Effects of intensive therapy using gait trainer or floor walking exercises early after stroke","volume":"41","author":"Peurala","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Rehabil Med"},{"issue":"(1\u20132)","key":"R36-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jns.2015.04.033","article-title":"Gait training in subacute non-ambulatory stroke patients using a full weight-bearing gait-assistance robot: A prospective, randomized, open, blinded-endpoint trial","volume":"353","author":"Ochi","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Neurol Sci"},{"issue":"4","key":"R37-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1177\/1545968313513073","article-title":"Randomized Trial of a Robotic Assistive Device for the Upper Extremity During Early Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":"28","author":"Masiero","year":"2014","journal-title":"Neurorehabil Neural Repair"},{"issue":"135","key":"R38-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-14-135","article-title":"Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and\/or interquartile range","volume":"14","author":"Wan","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"issue":"10","key":"R39-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1298","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2006.06.016","article-title":"Effectiveness of gait training using an electromechanical gait trainer, with and without functional electric stimulation, in subacute stroke: A randomized controlled trial","volume":"87","author":"Tong","year":"2006","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"issue":"2","key":"R40-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1161\/01.STR.0000254607.48765.cb","article-title":"Effects of locomotion training with assistance of a robot-driven gait orthosis in hemiparetic patients after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study","volume":"38","author":"Husemann","year":"2007","journal-title":"Stroke"},{"issue":"2","key":"R41-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.3109\/17483107.2013.873489","article-title":"Recovery of walking ability using a robotic device in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled study","volume":"10","author":"Nunen","year":"2015","journal-title":"Disability and rehabilitation Assistive technology"},{"issue":"7","key":"R42-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1000097","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097","article-title":"Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement","volume":"6","author":"Moher","year":"2009","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"R43-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1177\/0269215506071281","article-title":"Repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy improve walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke: a single-blind, randomized multicentre trial (DEutsche GAngtrainerStudie, DEGAS)","volume":"21","author":"Pohl","year":"2007","journal-title":"Clin Rehabil"},{"issue":"5","key":"R44-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"683","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2015.12.025","article-title":"Efficacy of an Electromechanical Gait Trainer Poststroke in Singapore: A Randomized Controlled Trial","volume":"97","author":"Chua","year":"2016","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"issue":"7303","key":"R46-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.323.7303.42","article-title":"Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials","volume":"323","author":"J\u00fcni","year":"2001","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"2","key":"R47-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1016\/S1474-4422(13)70305-3","article-title":"Three-dimensional, task-specific robot therapy of the arm after stroke: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised trial","volume":"13","author":"Klamroth-Marganska","year":"2014","journal-title":"Lancet Neurol"},{"issue":"2","key":"R48-20230825","first-page":"2320","article-title":"Research bias: a review for medical students","volume":"4","author":"Krishna","year":"2010","journal-title":"J Clin Diagn Res"},{"key":"R49-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.d5928","article-title":"The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials","volume":"343","author":"Higgins","year":"2011","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"9307","key":"R50-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"696","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(02)07816-9","article-title":"Blinding in randomised trials: hiding who got what","volume":"359","author":"Schulz","year":"2002","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"11","key":"R51-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1054","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.282.11.1054","article-title":"The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis","volume":"282","author":"J\u00fcni","year":"1999","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"7","key":"R52-20230825","first-page":"CD006185","article-title":"Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke (Review)","author":"Mehrholz","year":"2013","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"11","key":"R53-20230825","first-page":"CD006876","article-title":"Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke","author":"Mehrholz","year":"2015","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"2","key":"R54-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1682\/JRRD.2005.04.0076","article-title":"Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke","volume":"43","author":"Prange","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Rehabil Res Dev"},{"issue":"1","key":"R55-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jht.2015.11.006","article-title":"Robot training for hand motor recovery in subacute stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial","volume":"29","author":"Orihuela-Espina","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Hand Ther"},{"issue":"32","key":"R59-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"973","DOI":"10.1161\/01.STR.32.4.973","article-title":"Modified Emory Functional Ambulation Profile","volume":"2001","author":"Baer","year":"2001","journal-title":"Stroke"},{"issue":"4","key":"R60-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1682\/JRRD.2010.04.0062","article-title":"Robot-assisted upper-limb therapy in acute rehabilitation setting following stroke: Department of Veterans Affairs multisite clinical trial","volume":"48","author":"Burgar","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Rehabil Res Dev"},{"issue":"2","key":"R62-20230825","first-page":"31","article-title":"Functional outcomes: The development of a new instrument to monitor the effectiveness of physical therapy","volume":"7","author":"Fung","year":"1997","journal-title":"Eur J Phys Rehab Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"R65-20230825","first-page":"283","article-title":"Development of the Korean Version of Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI): Multi-center Study for Subjects with Stroke","volume":"31","author":"Jung","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Korean Acad Rehabil Med"},{"key":"R68-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"d4002","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.d4002","article-title":"Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials","volume":"343","author":"Sterne","year":"2011","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"7109","key":"R69-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.315.7109.629","article-title":"Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test","volume":"315","author":"Egger","year":"1997","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"8","key":"R70-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1557","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2005.02.005","article-title":"The effectiveness of body weight-supported gait training and floor walking in patients with chronic stroke","volume":"86","author":"Peurala","year":"2005","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"issue":"2","key":"R71-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.1017\/S0266462312000086","article-title":"The effect of English-language restriction on systematic review-based meta-analyses: a systematic review of empirical studies","volume":"28","author":"Morrison","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int J Technol Assess Health Care"},{"issue":"4","key":"R72-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jht.2013.06.001","article-title":"Chronic stroke survivors achieve comparable outcomes following virtual task specific repetitive training guided by a wearable robotic orthosis (UL-EXO7) and actual task specific repetitive training guided by a physical therapist","volume":"26","author":"Byl","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Hand Ther"},{"issue":"11","key":"R73-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1754","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2011.06.016","article-title":"Effect of gravity on robot-assisted motor training after chronic stroke: a randomized trial","volume":"92","author":"Conroy","year":"2011","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"issue":"4","key":"R74-20230825","first-page":"499","article-title":"Can we improve gait skills in chronic hemiplegics? A randomised control trial with gait trainer","volume":"43","author":"Dias","year":"2007","journal-title":"Eura Medicophys"},{"issue":"7","key":"R75-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"678","DOI":"10.1177\/1545968314521004","article-title":"Modular ankle robotics training in early subacute stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study","volume":"28","author":"Forrester","year":"2014","journal-title":"Neurorehabil Neural Repair"},{"key":"R76-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"637","DOI":"10.1177\/0269215513516967","article-title":"Effect on arm function and cost of robot-assisted group therapy in subacute patients with stroke and a moderately to severely affected arm: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"28","author":"Hesse","year":"2014","journal-title":"Clin Rehabil"},{"issue":"6","key":"R77-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1786","DOI":"10.1161\/STROKEAHA.107.504779","article-title":"Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist- versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study","volume":"39","author":"Hornby","year":"2008","journal-title":"Stroke"},{"issue":"2","key":"R78-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1177\/0269215516633275","article-title":"Bilateral robotic priming before task-oriented approach in subacute stroke rehabilitation: A pilot randomized controlled trial","volume":"31","author":"Hsieh","year":"2017","journal-title":"Clin Rehabil"},{"issue":"10","key":"R79-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2729","DOI":"10.1161\/STROKEAHA.112.658807","article-title":"Dose-response relationship of robot-assisted stroke motor rehabilitation: The impact of initial motor status","volume":"43","author":"Hsieh","year":"2012","journal-title":"Stroke"},{"issue":"6","key":"R80-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1177\/1545968310394871","article-title":"Effects of treatment intensity in upper limb robot-assisted therapy for chronic stroke: A pilot randomized controlled trial","volume":"25","author":"Hsieh","year":"2011","journal-title":"Neurorehabil Neural Repair"},{"issue":"5","key":"R81-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1037","DOI":"10.1007\/s00415-014-7345-4","article-title":"Sequential combination of robot-assisted therapy and constraint-induced therapy in stroke rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial","volume":"261","author":"Hsieh","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Neurol"},{"key":"R82-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1186\/1743-0003-3-12","article-title":"Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study","volume":"3","author":"Kahn","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Neuroeng Rehabil"},{"issue":"4","key":"R83-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"636","DOI":"10.1109\/TNSRE.2015.2404936","article-title":"Effects of Innovative WALKBOT Robotic-Assisted Locomotor Training on Balance and Gait Recovery in Hemiparetic Stroke: A Prospective, Randomized, Experimenter Blinded Case Control Study With a Four-Week Follow-Up","volume":"23","author":"Kim","year":"2015","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng"},{"issue":"4","key":"R84-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.2522\/ptj.20090160","article-title":"Quality-of-life change associated with robotic-assisted therapy to improve hand motor function in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"90","author":"Kutner","year":"2010","journal-title":"Phys Ther"},{"issue":"2","key":"R85-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1177\/0269215511416383","article-title":"Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation on daily function and real-world arm activity in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"26","author":"Liao","year":"2012","journal-title":"Clin Rehabil"},{"issue":"5","key":"R86-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"631","DOI":"10.1682\/JRRD.2005.02.0044","article-title":"MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: A follow-up study","volume":"43","author":"Lum","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Rehabil Res Dev"},{"issue":"7","key":"R87-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"952","DOI":"10.1053\/apmr.2001.33101","article-title":"Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke","volume":"83","author":"Lum","year":"2002","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"issue":"4","key":"R88-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1682\/JRRD.2010.04.0063","article-title":"Upper-limb robot-assisted therapy in rehabilitation of acute stroke patients: focused review and results of new randomized controlled trial","volume":"48","author":"Masiero","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Rehabil Res Dev"},{"issue":"1","key":"R89-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1161\/STROKEAHA.107.495705","article-title":"A pilot study of randomized clinical controlled trial of gait training in subacute stroke patients with partial body-weight support electromechanical gait trainer and functional electrical stimulation: six-month follow-up","volume":"39","author":"Ng","year":"2008","journal-title":"Stroke"},{"issue":"12","key":"R90-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1071","DOI":"10.1177\/0269215508095358","article-title":"A pilot study of activity-based therapy in the arm motor recovery post stroke: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"22","author":"Rabadi","year":"2008","journal-title":"Clin Rehabil"},{"issue":"(11 Suppl 3)","key":"R91-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S232","DOI":"10.1097\/PHM.0b013e31826bce79","article-title":"Comparison of three-dimensional, assist-as-needed robotic arm\/hand movement training provided with Pneu-WREX to conventional tabletop therapy after chronic stroke","volume":"91","author":"Reinkensmeyer","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Phys Med Rehabil"},{"issue":"1","key":"R92-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.1186\/1743-0003-11-104","article-title":"Effects of upper limb robot-assisted therapy on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients","volume":"11","author":"Sale","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Neuroeng Rehabil"},{"issue":"3","key":"R93-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"236","DOI":"10.1097\/MRR.0000000000000059","article-title":"Recovery of hand function with robot-assisted therapy in acute stroke patients: a randomized-controlled trial","volume":"37","author":"Sale","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int J Rehabil Res"},{"issue":"11","key":"R94-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"987","DOI":"10.1097\/PHM.0000000000000119","article-title":"Gait training with a robotic leg brace after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study","volume":"93","author":"Stein","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Phys Med Rehabil"},{"issue":"1","key":"R95-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1186\/s12984-015-0033-5","article-title":"Efficacy of robot-assisted fingers training in chronic stroke survivors: a pilot randomized-controlled trial","volume":"12","author":"Susanto","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Neuroeng Rehabil"},{"issue":"1","key":"R96-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1097\/MRR.0000000000000137","article-title":"Conflicting results of robot-assisted versus usual gait training during postacute rehabilitation of stroke patients: a randomized clinical trial","volume":"39","author":"Taveggia","year":"2016","journal-title":"Int J Rehabil Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"R97-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"351","DOI":"10.1177\/0269215516642606","article-title":"Feasibility and efficacy of a robotic device for hand rehabilitation in hemiplegic stroke patients: A randomized pilot controlled study","volume":"31","author":"Vanoglio","year":"2016","journal-title":"Clin Rehabil"},{"issue":"3","key":"R98-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1177\/1545968307311102","article-title":"Intensive sensorimotor arm training mediated by therapist or robot improves hemiparesis in patients with chronic stroke","volume":"22","author":"Volpe","year":"2008","journal-title":"Neurorehabil Neural Repair"},{"issue":"11","key":"R99-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2006","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2014.07.002","article-title":"Locomotion improvement using a hybrid assistive limb in recovery phase stroke patients: A randomized controlled pilot study","volume":"95","author":"Watanabe","year":"2014","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"issue":"1","key":"R100-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1186\/1743-0003-6-18","article-title":"Pilot study of Lokomat versus manual-assisted treadmill training for locomotor recovery post-stroke","volume":"6","author":"Westlake","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Neuroeng Rehabil"},{"issue":"8","key":"R101-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1006","DOI":"10.2522\/ptj.20110282","article-title":"Effect of therapist-based versus robot-assisted bilateral arm training on motor control, functional performance, and quality of life after chronic stroke: a clinical trial","volume":"92","author":"Wu","year":"2012","journal-title":"Phys Ther"},{"issue":"1","key":"R102-20230825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1186\/1743-0003-10-35","article-title":"Unilateral versus bilateral robot-assisted rehabilitation on arm-trunk control and functions post stroke: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"10","author":"Wu","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Neuroeng Rehabil"}],"container-title":["JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/01938924-201712000-00015","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,11]],"date-time":"2026-08-11T12:57:24Z","timestamp":1786453044000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/01938924-201712000-00015"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,12]]},"references-count":84,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11124\/jbisrir-2017-003456","relation":{},"ISSN":["2202-4433"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2202-4433","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,12]]}}}