{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,26]],"date-time":"2025-10-26T13:58:40Z","timestamp":1761487120714},"reference-count":7,"publisher":"ASME International","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":["asmedigitalcollection.asme.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2004,3,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>For twenty years the manufacturing domain has been seeking to share product model data by defining an entity relationship model covering the life cycle of geometrically defined products. The data sharing is implemented by selecting subsets of these entities and relationships to define data exchange standards for CAD, CAE, CAM, CNC and PDM systems. The approach requires agreement on how data will be reused across the domains so an organization has been meeting to manage the required data definitions. Considerable success was achieved in 1995 when a standard was proposed and implemented by industry as a way to move 3D geometry between CAD systems. Now, a new protocol for exchanging manufacturing process information between CAM systems and CNC devices is being released. This protocol reuses much of the data defined for the other domains and will allow CNC manufacturing tools to process 3D data, but the complexity of the specification is causing controversy. In this paper we report on the new specification and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of its approach to defining CNC control programs.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1115\/1.1641188","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2004,3,23]],"date-time":"2004-03-23T18:06:01Z","timestamp":1080065161000},"page":"60-67","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1115\/crossmarkpolicy-asme","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":15,"title":["On STEP-NC and the Complexities of Product Data Integration"],"prefix":"10.1115","volume":"4","author":[{"given":"Martin","family":"Hardwick","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"RPI, Troy, NY 12180"},{"name":"President STEP Tools, Inc."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"33","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2004,3,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"2019100522425017100_r1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hardwick, M., Spooner, D. L., Morris, K. C., and Rando, T., February 1996, \u201cSharing Manufacturing Information in Virtual Enterprises,\u201d Commun. ACM, 39(2), pp. 46\u201354.","DOI":"10.1145\/230798.230803"},{"key":"2019100522425017100_r2","unstructured":"ISO 10303-1, 1994, \u201cIndustrial Automation Systems and Integration Product Data Representation and exchange\u2014Overview and Fundamental Principles,\u201d International Standard, ISO TC184\/SC4, Geneva Switzerland."},{"key":"2019100522425017100_r3","unstructured":"Brunnermeier, S. B., and Martin, S. A., March 1999, \u201cInteroperability Cost Analysis of the U.S. Automotive Supply Chain,\u201d Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC."},{"key":"2019100522425017100_r4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Suh, S. H., Cho, J. H., and Hong, H. D., January 2002, \u201cOn the Architecture of Intelligent STEP-Compliant CNC,\u201d International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 15(2), pp. 168\u2013177.","DOI":"10.1080\/09511920110056541"},{"key":"2019100522425017100_r5","unstructured":"ISO 14649-1, 2001, \u201cIndustrial Automation Systems and Integration Physical Device Control-Part 1: Overview and Fundamental Principles,\u201d Draft International Standard, ISO TC184\/SC1, Geneva, Switzerland."},{"key":"2019100522425017100_r6","unstructured":"Hardwick, M.\n          , 2003, \u201cDigital Manufacturing using STEP-NC,\u201d Machining Technology, 14(1)."},{"key":"2019100522425017100_r7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Barnard, Feeney A.\n          , 2002, \u201cThe STEP Modular Architecture,\u201d J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., 2(2).","DOI":"10.1115\/1.1511520"}],"container-title":["Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/asmedigitalcollection.asme.org\/computingengineering\/article-pdf\/4\/1\/60\/5773311\/56_1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"http:\/\/asmedigitalcollection.asme.org\/computingengineering\/article-pdf\/4\/1\/60\/5773311\/56_1.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,5]],"date-time":"2019-10-05T22:42:58Z","timestamp":1570315378000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/asmedigitalcollection.asme.org\/computingengineering\/article\/4\/1\/60\/460141\/On-STEPNC-and-the-Complexities-of-Product-Data"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2004,3,1]]},"references-count":7,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2004,3,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1115\/1.1641188","relation":{},"ISSN":["1530-9827","1944-7078"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1530-9827","type":"print"},{"value":"1944-7078","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2004,3,1]]}}}