{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,26]],"date-time":"2025-09-26T08:13:43Z","timestamp":1758874423512,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":12,"publisher":"ASME International","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":["asmedigitalcollection.asme.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,12,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Using finite-element analysis (FEA) to numerically mount compliant components onto their inspection fixture is an approach proposed by researchers in the field of computational metrology. To address the shortcomings of the underlying principle of current methods, this paper presents a boundary displacement constrained (BDC) optimization using FEA. The optimization seeks to minimize the distance between corresponding points, in the scanned manufactured part and the nominal model, that are in unconstrained regions. This is done while maintaining that a distance between corresponding points in constrained regions (i.e., fixing points) remains within a specified contact distance. At the same time, the optimization limits the magnitude and direction of forces on boundary. In contrast to the current methods, postprocessing of the point cloud is not required since the method uses information retrieved from the FEA of the nominal model to estimate the manufactured part\u2019s mechanical behavior. To investigate the performance of the proposed method, it is tested on ten (10) free-state simulated manufactured aerospace panels that differ in their level of induced deformation. Results are then compared to those obtained using the underlying principles of current methods.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1115\/1.4031152","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,29]],"date-time":"2015-07-29T09:31:10Z","timestamp":1438162270000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1115\/crossmarkpolicy-asme","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["A Finite-Element Boundary Condition Setting Method for the Virtual Mounting of Compliant Components"],"prefix":"10.1115","volume":"15","author":[{"given":"Gad N.","family":"Abenhaim","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Mechanical Engineering,  Universit\u00e9 de Sherbrooke,  2500, Boulevard de l\u2019Universit\u00e9,  Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada  e-mail:"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Alain","family":"Desrochers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Mechanical Engineering,  Universit\u00e9 de Sherbrooke,  Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada  e-mail:"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Antoine S.","family":"Tahan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Mechanical Engineering,  \u00c9cole de technologie sup\u00e9rieure (\u00c9TS),  Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada  e-mail:"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jean","family":"Bigeon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"G-SCOP Laboratory,  Grenoble INP\u2013Universit\u00e9 Joseph Fourier,  46 Avenue F\u00e9lix Viallet,  Grenoble Cedex 1 38031, France  e-mail:"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"33","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,14]]},"reference":[{"issue":"5\u20138","key":"2019100316115145500_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"741","DOI":"10.1007\/s00170-012-3929-2","article-title":"Nonrigid Parts\u2019 Specification and Inspection Methods: Notions, Challenges, and Recent Advancements","volume":"63","year":"2012","journal-title":"Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol."},{"volume-title":"Dimensioning and Tolerancing","year":"2009","author":"ASME-Y14.5","key":"2019100316115145500_bib2"},{"volume-title":"Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)\u2014Geometrical Tolerancing\u2014Tolerances of Form, Orientation, Location and Run-Out","year":"2012","author":"ISO-1101","key":"2019100316115145500_bib3"},{"volume-title":"Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)\u2014Dimensioning and Tolerancing\u2014Non-Rigid Parts","year":"2010","author":"ISO-10579","key":"2019100316115145500_bib4"},{"key":"2019100316115145500_bib5","first-page":"539","article-title":"Testing Formed Sheet Metal Parts Using Fringe Projection and Evaluation by Virtual Distortion Compensation","volume-title":"Fringe","year":"2006"},{"issue":"4","key":"2019100316115145500_bib6","first-page":"321","article-title":"Optical Inspection of Formed Sheet Metal Parts Applying Fringe Projection Systems and Virtual Fixation","volume":"13","year":"2006","journal-title":"Metrol. Sci. Instrum."},{"issue":"3","key":"2019100316115145500_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"316","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cad.2010.11.004","article-title":"Predicting and Evaluating the Post-Assembly Shape of Thin-Walled Components Via 3D Laser Digitization and FEA Simulation of the Assembly Process","volume":"43","year":"2011","journal-title":"Comput.-Aided Des."},{"key":"2019100316115145500_bib8","unstructured":"Leme\u0161, S., 2010, \u201cValidation of Numerical Simulations by Digital Scanning of 3D Sheet Metal Objects,\u201d Ph.D. thesis, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia."},{"issue":"3","key":"2019100316115145500_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1115\/1.2831115","article-title":"Variation Simulation for Deformable Sheet Metal Assemblies Using Finite Element Methods","volume":"119","year":"1997","journal-title":"ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng."},{"key":"2019100316115145500_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1115\/DETC2012-70765","article-title":"Body in White Geometry Measurements of Non-Rigid Components: A Virtual Perspective","volume-title":"ASME","year":"2012"},{"key":"2019100316115145500_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4271\/2013-01-2172","article-title":"Aerospace Panels Fixtureless Inspection Methods With Restraining Force Requirements: A Technology Review","volume-title":"SAE","year":"2013"},{"edition":"6th ed.","volume-title":"The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals","year":"2005","key":"2019100316115145500_bib12"}],"container-title":["Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/asmedigitalcollection.asme.org\/computingengineering\/article-pdf\/doi\/10.1115\/1.4031152\/6100867\/jcise_015_04_041005.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"http:\/\/asmedigitalcollection.asme.org\/computingengineering\/article-pdf\/doi\/10.1115\/1.4031152\/6100867\/jcise_015_04_041005.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,3]],"date-time":"2019-10-03T16:12:00Z","timestamp":1570119120000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/asmedigitalcollection.asme.org\/computingengineering\/article\/doi\/10.1115\/1.4031152\/370317\/A-FiniteElement-Boundary-Condition-Setting-Method"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,14]]},"references-count":12,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,12,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1115\/1.4031152","relation":{},"ISSN":["1530-9827","1944-7078"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1530-9827"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1944-7078"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,14]]},"article-number":"041005"}}