{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T16:22:15Z","timestamp":1791390135879,"version":"4.3.3"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"SRUMB - Romanian Society for Ultrasonography in Medicine and Biology","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Med Ultrason"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Aims: The aim of this study was to compare technical success and tolerability between hysterosalpingography (HSG) and hysterosalpingo-contrast ultrasonography (HyCoUs) as a first-line evaluation method in a single fertility center. Material and methods: The study included 56 infertile women: 27 patients underwent HSG and 29 patients underwent HyCoUs. Pain perception was measured by means of an 11-point visual analog scale (VAS) and the Stacy score. Side-effects, technical aspects, complications and variable correlations were documented. Results: The median VAS scale was 5 (4;6) for HSG and 1 (1;2) for HyCoUs. The median Stacy score was 2 (1;3) for HSG and 1 (0;1) for HyCoUs. The difference in pain perception was statistically significant for both pain scores (p&lt;0.001). All patients undergoing HyCoUs reported a visual analog (VAS) pain score of &lt;5 and 59.3% of patients undergoing an HSG reported a score of &gt;5. Increased pain scores showed a statistically significant association with duration and total volume of substance infused. The type of procedure and volume infused were independently associated with the VAS scale. In the HSG group, 14.8% (4) of patients reported a vagal effect (p&lt;0.001), one patient requiring hospitalization. No vagal effects were reported following HyCoUs and the method was technically successful in 100% (29) of cases. HSG was successful in 88.9% (24) of cases. Conclusions: HyCoUs is a well-tolerated procedure with reduced frequency of adverse effects. Low pain perception is strongly correlated with a low volume infused. It is non-invasive and efficient in rendering good quality images.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.11152\/mu-2692","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,14]],"date-time":"2021-03-14T18:21:16Z","timestamp":1615746076000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Comparison of Hystero-salpingography and Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography for tubal patency testing: technical success, pain perception, side effects and complications"],"prefix":"10.11152","author":[{"given":"Anita Roxana","family":"Maxim","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ovidiu Horia","family":"Gligor","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Radu Ion","family":"Badea","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"4840","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,14]]},"container-title":["Medical Ultrasonography"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.medultrason.ro\/medultrason\/index.php\/medultrason\/article\/viewFile\/2692\/1754","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.medultrason.ro\/medultrason\/index.php\/medultrason\/article\/viewFile\/2692\/1754","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,8]],"date-time":"2021-06-08T18:11:53Z","timestamp":1623175913000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.medultrason.ro\/medultrason\/index.php\/medultrason\/article\/view\/2692"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,14]]},"references-count":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11152\/mu-2692","relation":{},"ISSN":["2066-8643","1844-4172"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2066-8643","type":"electronic"},{"value":"1844-4172","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,14]]}}}