{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,23]],"date-time":"2024-10-23T08:07:40Z","timestamp":1729670860259,"version":"3.28.0"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"SPIE","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,4]]},"DOI":"10.1117\/12.2512603","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,5]],"date-time":"2019-03-05T01:36:28Z","timestamp":1551749788000},"page":"24","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Development of methods to evaluate probability of reviewer\u2019s assessment bias in blinded independent central review (BICR) imaging studies"],"prefix":"10.1117","author":[{"given":"Anitha","family":"Singareddy","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J. Michael","family":"O'Connor","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Manish","family":"Sharma","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"189","reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"c1","article-title":"Monitoring Reader Metrics in Blinded Independent Central Review of Oncology Studies","volume":"5","author":"Cohen","year":"2015","journal-title":"J. Clin Trials"},{"key":"c2","unstructured":"Eisenhauer E.A. et al., \u201cNew response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)\u201d, European Journal of Cancer"},{"key":"c3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/10428194.2016.1233535"},{"key":"c4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2282011860"},{"key":"c5","article-title":"Cognitive factors in reading medical images: A survey of cognitive factors and models of medical image interpretation","volume-title":"The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques","author":"Manning","year":"2010"},{"key":"c6","unstructured":"Clinical Trial Imaging Endpoint Process Standards, Guidance for Industry (U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration, CDER and CBER), Final, April 2018"},{"key":"c7","article-title":"Development of discordant likelihood metrics for use of \u201cdouble reviewer\u201d performance in Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) RECIST imaging studies","volume-title":"Proc. SPIE 10136-8","volume":"1013609","author":"O\u2019Connor","year":"2017"},{"key":"c8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.e18592"},{"key":"c9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1117\/12.2512611","article-title":"Reader disagreement index: a better measure of overall review quality in an oncology trial compared to adjudication rate","author":"Sharma","year":"2019","journal-title":"Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, SPIE Medical Imaging"},{"key":"c10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4172\/2167-0870.1000289"},{"key":"c11","first-page":"97","volume-title":"Practical nonparametric statistics","author":"Conover","year":"1971"},{"key":"c12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/26.4.404"},{"key":"c13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1182\/blood-2007-06-093906"},{"key":"c14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.1999.17.4.1244"},{"key":"c15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2006.09.2403"},{"key":"c16","article-title":"Reader Performance: Detection and Monitoring","author":"Raunig","year":"2016","journal-title":"PINTAD WebEx Presentation"}],"event":{"name":"Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment","start":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,16]]},"location":"San Diego, United States","end":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,21]]}},"container-title":["Medical Imaging 2019: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,20]],"date-time":"2019-11-20T00:59:47Z","timestamp":1574211587000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/10952\/2512603\/Development-of-methods-to-evaluate-probability-of-reviewers-assessment-bias\/10.1117\/12.2512603.full"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"Robert M.","family":"Nishikawa","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"editor","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Frank W.","family":"Samuelson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"editor","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,4]]},"references-count":16,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1117\/12.2512603","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,4]]}}}