{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,10]],"date-time":"2025-09-10T21:52:03Z","timestamp":1757541123587},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[1998,6,4]],"date-time":"1998-06-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":896918400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":2591,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Medical Physics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1991,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Spatial variation in the background source distribution makes tumor detection difficult for single\u2010detector probes. Using a single energy window that brackets the photopeak helps discriminate against background events dominated by Compton scattering. Another approach is to use the information provided by an additional window in the Compton region. The performances of NaI(Tl), CdTe, and HgI<jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub> surgical probes have been compared under realistic simulations of a tumor\u2010staging procedure using optimal single\u2010sided energy windows and a two\u2010window scatter\u2010subtraction technique. Results showed that despite the differences in energy resolution of the detectors, the performances of the probes in a variable background were similar when optimal single energy windows were used. When the background variations were large, using information provided by a second window improved probe performance.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1118\/1.596683","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2003,3,28]],"date-time":"2003-03-28T15:37:52Z","timestamp":1048865872000},"page":"382-389","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Comparison of NaI(Tl), CdTe, and HgI<sub>2<\/sub> surgical probes: Effect of scatter compensation on probe performance"],"prefix":"10.1002","volume":"18","author":[{"given":"D. P.","family":"Kwo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"H. B.","family":"Barber","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"H. H.","family":"Barrett","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"T. S.","family":"Hickernell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J. M.","family":"Woolfenden","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[1998,6,4]]},"container-title":["Medical Physics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1118%2F1.596683","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.1118%2F1.596683","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1118\/1.596683","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,16]],"date-time":"2023-09-16T16:58:48Z","timestamp":1694883528000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1118\/1.596683"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1991,5]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1991,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1118\/1.596683"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1118\/1.596683","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0094-2405","2473-4209"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0094-2405","type":"print"},{"value":"2473-4209","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1991,5]]}}}