{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,20]],"date-time":"2026-07-20T23:48:14Z","timestamp":1784591294282,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Human Kinetics","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec sec-type=\"objective\"><jats:title>Objective:<\/jats:title><jats:p>To determine the effects of scapular mobilization on function, pain, range of motion, and satisfaction in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SAIS).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec sec-type=\"design\"><jats:title>Design:<\/jats:title><jats:p>Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec sec-type=\"setting\"><jats:title>Setting:<\/jats:title><jats:p>University hospital clinics in Turkey.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec sec-type=\"participants\"><jats:title>Participants:<\/jats:title><jats:p>66 participants (mean \u00b1 SD age 52.06 \u00b1 3.71 y) with SAIS.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec sec-type=\"interventions\"><jats:title>Interventions:<\/jats:title><jats:p>Participants were randomized into 3 groups: scapular mobilization, sham scapular mobilization, and supervised exercise. Before the interventions transcutaneous electrical stimulation and hot pack were applied to all groups. Total intervention duration for all groups was 3 wk with a total of 9 treatment sessions.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec sec-type=\"main outcome measures\"><jats:title>Main Outcome Measures:<\/jats:title><jats:p>Shoulder function and pain intensity were primary outcome measures; range of motion and participant satisfaction were secondary outcome measures. Shoulder function was assessed with the short form of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH). A visual analog scale was used to evaluate pain severity. Active range of motion was measured with a universal goniometer. A 7-point Likert scale was used to evaluate satisfaction. Outcome measurements were performed at baseline, before visits 5 and 10, 4 wk after visit 9, and 8 wk after visit 9.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec sec-type=\"results\"><jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title><jats:p>There was no group difference for DASH score (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = .75), pain at rest (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = .41), pain with activity (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = .45), pain at night (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = .74), and shoulder flexion (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = .65), external rotation (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = .63), and internal rotation (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = .19). There was a significant increase in shoulder motion and function and a significant decrease in pain across time when all groups were combined (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> &lt; .001). The level of satisfaction was not significantly different for any of the questions about participant satisfaction between all groups (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> &gt; .05).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec sec-type=\"conclusion\"><jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title><jats:p>There was not a significant advantage of scapular mobilization for shoulder function, pain, range of motion, and satisfaction compared with sham or supervised-exercise groups in patients with SAIS.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1123\/jsr.2013-0120","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,7,23]],"date-time":"2014-07-23T12:11:13Z","timestamp":1406117473000},"page":"116-129","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":28,"title":["The Effects of Scapular Mobilization in Patients With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial"],"prefix":"10.1123","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Aydan","family":"Aytar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gul","family":"Baltaci","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tim","family":"Uhl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Handan","family":"Tuzun","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pinar","family":"Oztop","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Metin","family":"Karatas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"100","container-title":["Journal of Sport Rehabilitation"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.humankinetics.com\/view\/journals\/jsr\/24\/2\/article-p116.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.humankinetics.com\/downloadpdf\/journals\/jsr\/24\/2\/article-p116.xml","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,19]],"date-time":"2022-05-19T23:09:10Z","timestamp":1653001750000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.humankinetics.com\/view\/journals\/jsr\/24\/2\/article-p116.xml"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,5]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1123\/jsr.2013-0120","relation":{},"ISSN":["1056-6716","1543-3072"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1056-6716","type":"print"},{"value":"1543-3072","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,5]]}}}