{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,27]],"date-time":"2025-09-27T22:09:26Z","timestamp":1759010966107},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"American Society for Microbiology","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[1984,9,1]],"date-time":"1984-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":462844800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.asm.org\/non-commercial-tdm-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.asm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J Clin Microbiol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1984,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay has been established to measure anthrax antibody titers. The protective antigen component of anthrax toxin was used as the capture antigen. Two types of conjugates (protein A-horseradish peroxidase and anti-human immunoglobulin G plus immunoglobulin A plus immunoglobulin M-horseradish peroxidase) were tested. Results from enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay testing were compared with those from indirect hemagglutination titers on serum from vaccinees. The overall trend of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and indirect hemagglutination titers was significant. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay offered speed, precision, and reduced cost per test.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1128\/jcm.20.3.357-361.1984","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,5]],"date-time":"2020-01-05T02:47:48Z","timestamp":1578192468000},"page":"357-361","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1128\/asmj-crossmark-policy-page","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":25,"title":["Comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent and indirect hemagglutination assays for determining anthrax antibodies"],"prefix":"10.1128","volume":"20","author":[{"given":"A","family":"Johnson-Winegar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"235","container-title":["Journal of Clinical Microbiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.asm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1128\/jcm.20.3.357-361.1984","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.asm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1128\/jcm.20.3.357-361.1984","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,4]],"date-time":"2022-03-04T22:14:19Z","timestamp":1646432059000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.asm.org\/doi\/10.1128\/jcm.20.3.357-361.1984"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1984,9]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1984,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1128\/jcm.20.3.357-361.1984"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1128\/jcm.20.3.357-361.1984","relation":{},"ISSN":["0095-1137","1098-660X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0095-1137","type":"print"},{"value":"1098-660X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1984,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"1984-09-01","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}