{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,22]],"date-time":"2026-02-22T15:01:51Z","timestamp":1771772511770,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":6,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Less invasive techniques of respiratory support are increasingly popular.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Objective:<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>To determine how widespread the use of neonatal nasal intermittent positive airway pressure (NIPPV) has become and describe the range of practice used in NIPPV in England.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>95 English Neonatal intensive care units were asked to provide information about NIPPV devices, interfaces, indications, guidelines, use of synchronisation, complications, settings and weaning.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>91 (96%) units replied. NIPPV was used by 44\/91 (48%) units; few complications were seen. 34\/44 (77%) used a synchronising device, 35\/44 (80%) used NIPPV for \u201crescuing\u201d babies for whom continuous positive airway pressure failed\u201459% routinely after extubation and 16% as a first-line treatment. A wide range of pressure and rate settings were used.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>\n               <jats:sec>\n                  <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>In England, NIPPV is commonly used, with considerable variability in the techniques applied. The wide range of clinical approaches highlights the paucity of evidence available. More evidence is needed to establish best practice.<\/jats:p>\n               <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1136\/adc.2007.118109","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,9,17]],"date-time":"2007-09-17T20:25:02Z","timestamp":1190060702000},"page":"F148-F150","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":64,"title":["Neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation: a survey of practice in England"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"93","author":[{"given":"L S","family":"Owen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"C J","family":"Morley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"P G","family":"Davis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2007,9,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"2025090512430067000_93.2.F148.1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7210849"},{"key":"2025090512430067000_93.2.F148.2","first-page":"1464","article-title":"Use of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation to avoid intubation in neonates.","volume":"25","author":"Manzar","year":"2004","journal-title":"Saudi Med J"},{"key":"2025090512430067000_93.2.F148.3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7211131"},{"key":"2025090512430067000_93.2.F148.4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Davis PG Lemyre B de Paoli AG . Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;(3):CD003212.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD003212"},{"key":"2025090512430067000_93.2.F148.5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"De Paoli AG Davis PG Faber B . Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002\u00c2\u00a0;(4):CD002977.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD002977"},{"key":"2025090512430067000_93.2.F148.6","first-page":"406","article-title":"Increased risk of gastrointestinal perforations in neonates mechanically ventilated with either face mask or nasal prongs.","volume":"76","author":"Garland","year":"1985","journal-title":"Pediatrics"}],"container-title":["Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/adc.2007.118109","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,5]],"date-time":"2025-09-05T19:43:17Z","timestamp":1757101397000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/fn.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/adc.2007.118109"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2007,9,17]]},"references-count":6,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2008,2,22]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/adc.2007.118109"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/adc.2007.118109","relation":{},"ISSN":["1359-2998","1468-2052"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1359-2998","type":"print"},{"value":"1468-2052","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2007,9,17]]}}}