{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,23]],"date-time":"2025-09-23T13:01:52Z","timestamp":1758632512611},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"10","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["British Journal of Ophthalmology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,10,1]]},"DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.2009.160614","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,7,2]],"date-time":"2009-07-02T00:29:33Z","timestamp":1246494573000},"page":"1371-1375","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["The value of the ophthalmological independent medical examination: analysis of 344 cases"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"93","author":[{"given":"J S","family":"Schutz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"N A","family":"Mavrakanas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2009,6,30]]},"container-title":["British Journal of Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/bjo.2009.160614","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,25]],"date-time":"2020-09-25T21:17:32Z","timestamp":1601068652000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bjo.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/bjo.2009.160614"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2009,6,30]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2009,9,24]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,10,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bjo.2009.160614","relation":{},"ISSN":["0007-1161"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0007-1161","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2009,6,30]]}}}