{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,22]],"date-time":"2025-07-22T11:02:55Z","timestamp":1753182175900},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["British Journal of Ophthalmology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1998,4,1]]},"DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.82.4.392","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2008,12,8]],"date-time":"2008-12-08T18:17:31Z","timestamp":1228760251000},"page":"392-396","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":19,"title":["Open lacrimal surgery: a comparison of admission outcome and complications after planned day case or inpatient management"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"82","author":[{"given":"I. T","family":"Hanna","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"S.","family":"Powrie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"G. E","family":"Rose","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"239","container-title":["British Journal of Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/bjo.82.4.392","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,26]],"date-time":"2020-09-26T10:33:48Z","timestamp":1601116428000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bjo.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/bjo.82.4.392"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1998,4,1]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1998,4,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bjo.82.4.392","relation":{},"ISSN":["0007-1161"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0007-1161","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1998,4,1]]}}}