{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,4]],"date-time":"2022-04-04T16:58:15Z","timestamp":1649091495212},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"12","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2002,12,1]]},"DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.86.12.1459-a","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2002,11,22]],"date-time":"2002-11-22T01:22:05Z","timestamp":1037928125000},"page":"1459-a-1459","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Sclera substitutes: a cautionary note"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"86","author":[{"given":"W J","family":"Armitage","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"239","container-title":["British Journal of Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/bjo.86.12.1459-a","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,26]],"date-time":"2020-09-26T10:45:01Z","timestamp":1601117101000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bjo.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/bjo.86.12.1459-a"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2002,12,1]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bjo.86.12.1459-a","relation":{},"ISSN":["0007-1161"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0007-1161","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2002,12,1]]}}}