{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,22]],"date-time":"2025-12-22T17:13:01Z","timestamp":1766423581662,"version":"3.48.0"},"reference-count":11,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"6881","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[1993,3,27]],"date-time":"1993-03-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":733190400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.bmj.com\/company\/legal-information\/terms-conditions\/legal-information\/tdm-licencepolicy"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMJ"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1993,3,27]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Balancing the risks of prolonged gestation against those of induced labour is difficult. Risks to the fetus increase slightly after 42 weeks' gestation but women having labour induced are more likely to have instrumental deliveries or babies with low Apgar scores. Since many women are now expressing a preference for minimal interference in childbirth the most acceptable management of post-term pregnancy seems to be increased fetal surveillance. Each case needs to be considered individually and it is important that the woman is involved in the decision to induce.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.306.6881.840","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,3,30]],"date-time":"2009-03-30T08:16:37Z","timestamp":1238400997000},"page":"840-841","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["Is routine induction of labour at term ever justified?"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"306","author":[{"given":"L","family":"Cardozo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[1993,3,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"334","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(88)90150-0","article-title":"Obstetric consequences of postmaturity","volume":"158","author":"Boyd, M.E.; Usher, R.H.; McClem, F.H.; Kramer, M.S.","year":"1988","unstructured":"Boyd ME, Usher RH, McClem FH, Kramer MS. Obstetric consequences of postmaturity. AmJ Obstet Gynecol 1988;158:334-8.","journal-title":"AmJ Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref_2","first-page":"292","article-title":"Prolonged pregnancy: is induction of labour indicated? A prospective study. Br J7 Obster Gynaecol","volume":"89","author":"Gibb, D.M.F.; Cardozo, L.D.; Studd, J.W.W.; Cooper, D.J.","year":"1982","unstructured":"Gibb DMF, Cardozo LD, Studd JWW, Cooper DJ. Prolonged pregnancy: is induction of labour indicated? A prospective study. Br J7 Obster Gynaecol 1982;89:292-5."},{"key":"ref_3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1059","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.293.6554.1059","article-title":"Prolonged pregnancy-the management debate","volume":"293","author":"Cardozo, L.D.; Fysh, J.; Pearce, J.M.","year":"1986","unstructured":"Cardozo LD, Fysh J, Pearce JM. Prolonged pregnancy-the management debate. BMJ 1986;293:1059-63.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref_4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1587","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199206113262402","article-title":"Willan A and the Canadian multicenter post-term pregnancy trial group. Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy. A randomised controlled trial","volume":"326","author":"Hannah, M.E.; Hannah, W.J.; Hellmann, J.; Hewson, S.; Milner, R.","year":"1992","unstructured":"Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hellmann J, Hewson S, Milner R, Willan A and the Canadian multicenter post-term pregnancy trial group. Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy. A randomised controlled trial. NEnglJMed 1992;326:1587-92.","journal-title":"NEnglJMed"},{"key":"ref_5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1190","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(91)92044-3","article-title":"Effect of gestational age on obstetric performance: when is \"term\" over?","volume":"338","author":"Saunders, N.; Paterson, C.","year":"1991","unstructured":"Saunders N, Paterson C. Effect of gestational age on obstetric performance: when is \"term\" over? Lancet 1991;338:1190-2.","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"ref_6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(92)91028-7","article-title":"Gestational age and obstetric performance","volume":"339","author":"Chapatte 0, Versi E","year":"1992","unstructured":"Chapatte 0, Versi E. Gestational age and obstetric performance. Lancet 1992;339: 122.","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"ref_7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"683","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348909006139","article-title":"Comparison of induced versus non-induced labor in post-term pregnancy","volume":"68","author":"Bergsio, P.; Gui-dan, H.; Su-qui, Y.; Zhi-zeng, G.; Bakketeig, L.S.","year":"1989","unstructured":"Bergsio P, Gui-dan H, Su-qui Y, Zhi-zeng G, Bakketeig LS. Comparison of induced versus non-induced labor in post-term pregnancy. Acta Obstet GynecolScand 1989;68:683-7.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet GynecolScand"},{"issue":"1","key":"ref_8","first-page":"192","article-title":"Randomised comparison of early versus late induction of labour in post-term pregnancy","volume":"294","author":"Augensen, K.; Bergsjo, P.; Eikeland, T.; Askrik, K.; Carlsen, J.","year":"1987","unstructured":"Augensen K, Bergsjo P, Eikeland T, Askrik K, Carlsen J. Randomised comparison of early versus late induction of labour in post-term pregnancy. BMJ 1987;294:1 192-5.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"ref_9","article-title":"Caesarean section-unrecognised morbidity","author":"Kelleher, C.; Cardozo, L.D.","unstructured":"Kelleher C, Cardozo LD. Caesarean section-unrecognised morbidity. J Obstet Gynaecol (in press).","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"ref_10","first-page":"678","article-title":"Stripping membranes at term: can it safely reduce the incidence of post-term pregnancies?","volume":"76","author":"McColgin, S.W.; Hampton, H.L.; McCaul, J.F.; Howard, P.R.; Andrew, M.E.; Morrison, J.C.","year":"1990","unstructured":"McColgin SW, Hampton HL, McCaul JF, Howard PR, Andrew ME, Morrison JC. Stripping membranes at term: can it safely reduce the incidence of post-term pregnancies? Obstet Gynecol 1990;76:678-80.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"ref_11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199102000-00008","article-title":"A comparison of Doppler flow velocity waveforms, amniotic fluid columns and non-stress test as a means ofmonitoring postdate pregnancies","volume":"77","author":"Pearce, J.M.; McParland, P.J.","year":"1991","unstructured":"Pearce JM, McParland PJ. A comparison of Doppler flow velocity waveforms, amniotic fluid columns and non-stress test as a means ofmonitoring postdate pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:204-8.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["BMJ"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/data.bmj.org\/tdm\/10.1136\/bmj.306.6881.840","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/bmj.306.6881.840","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,22]],"date-time":"2025-12-22T17:08:44Z","timestamp":1766423324000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/bmj.306.6881.840"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1993,3,27]]},"references-count":11,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6881","published-online":{"date-parts":[[1993,3,27]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1993,3,27]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/bmj.306.6881.840"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.306.6881.840","relation":{},"ISSN":["0959-8138","1468-5833"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0959-8138"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1468-5833"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1993,3,27]]}}}