{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]],"date-time":"2026-03-06T05:53:30Z","timestamp":1772776410538,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"7051","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[1996,7,27]],"date-time":"1996-07-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":838425600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.bmj.com\/company\/legal-information\/terms-conditions\/legal-information\/tdm-licencepolicy"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMJ"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[1996,5,17]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1996,7,27]]},"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>\n \n Objective<\/jats:bold>\n : To use data from the fourth national survey of morbidity in general practice to investigate the association between home visiting rates and patients' characteristics.\n <\/jats:p>\n \n Design<\/jats:bold>\n : Survey of diagnostic data on all home visits by general practitioners.\n <\/jats:p>\n \n Setting<\/jats:bold>\n : 60 general practices in England and Wales.\n <\/jats:p>\n \n Subjects<\/jats:bold>\n : 502 493 patients visited at home between September 1991 and August 1992.\n <\/jats:p>\n \n Main outcome measures<\/jats:bold>\n : Home visiting rates per 1000 patient years and home visiting ratios standardised for age and sex.\n <\/jats:p>\n \n Results<\/jats:bold>\n : 10.1% (139 801\/1 378 510) of contacts with general practitioners took place in patients' homes. The average annual home visiting rate was 299\/1000 patient years. Rates showed a J shaped relation with age and were lowest in people aged 16-24 years (103\/1000) and highest in people aged >\/=85 years (3009\/1000). 1.3% of patients were visited five or more times and received 39% of visits. Age and sex standardised home visiting ratios increased from 69 (95% confidence interval 68 to 70) in social class I to 129 (128 to 130) in social class V. The commonest diagnostic group was diseases of the respiratory system. In older age groups, diseases of the circulatory system was also a common diagnostic group. Standardised home visiting ratios for the 60 practices in the study varied nearly eightfold, from 28 to 218 (inter-quartile range 67 to 126).\n <\/jats:p>\n \n Conclusions<\/jats:bold>\n : Home visits remain an important component of general practitioners' workload. As well as the strong associations between home visiting rates and patient characteristics, there were also large differences between practices in home visiting rates. A small number of patients received a disproportionately high number of home visits. Further investigation of patients with high home visiting rates may help to explain the large differences in workload between general practices and help in allocation of resources to practices.\n <\/jats:p>\n \n \n \n Key messages<\/jats:title>\n \n \n Annual home visiting rates declined by 27% between 1981-2 and 1991-2, from 411\/1000 patient years to 299\/1000, suggesting that general practitioners are altering the way in which they provide care to provide less care in patients' homes; however, home visits were responsible for 10% of all contacts with general practitioners<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:list-item>\n \n Home visiting rates showed a J shaped relation with age and, after standardisation for age and sex, were twice as high in people from social class V as in people from social class I<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:list-item>\n \n There was a nearly eightfold variation in age and sex standardised home visiting ratios among the 60 general practices in this study, and just over 1% of patients registered with general practitioners received nearly 40% of all home visits<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:list-item>\n \n Further investigation of both patients and practices with high home visiting rates may help to explain the large differences in workload among general practices and also help in the allocation of resources to practices<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:list-item>\n <\/jats:list>\n <\/jats:sec>\n <\/jats:boxed-text>\n <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.313.7051.207","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,10,27]],"date-time":"2011-10-27T19:41:49Z","timestamp":1319744509000},"page":"207-210","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":39,"title":["Home visiting by general practitioners in England and Wales"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"313","author":[{"given":"Paul","family":"Aylin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"F Azeem","family":"Majeed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Derek G","family":"Cook","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[1996,7,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"2025122310332479000_313.7051.207.1","first-page":"521","article-title":"Twenty-one years of general practice\u2014changing patterns.","volume":"22","author":"Fry","year":"1972","journal-title":"J R Coll Gen Pract"},{"key":"2025122310332479000_313.7051.207.2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.1.5798.487","article-title":"Survey of home visiting by general practitioners in North-East England.","volume":"i","author":"Marsh","year":"1972","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025122310332479000_313.7051.207.3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.282.6258.115","article-title":"Home visiting in a rural practice.","volume":"282","author":"Humphreys","year":"1981","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025122310332479000_313.7051.207.4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1259","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.286.6373.1259","article-title":"Changing patterns of home visiting in the north of England.","volume":"286","author":"Whewell","year":"1983","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025122310332479000_313.7051.207.5","first-page":"16","article-title":"Daily home visiting in one general practice: a longitudinal study of patient-initiated workload.","volume":"41","author":"Beale","year":"1991","journal-title":"Br J Gen Pract"},{"key":"2025122310332479000_313.7051.207.6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14803","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.290.6480.1480","article-title":"Factors associated with home visiting in an inner London general practice.","volume":"290","author":"Bucquet","year":"1985","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025122310332479000_313.7051.207.7","first-page":"531","article-title":"Annual night visiting rates in 129 general practices in one family health services authority: association with patient and general practice characteristics.","volume":"45","author":"Majeed","year":"1995","journal-title":"Br J Gen Pract"},{"key":"2025122310332479000_313.7051.207.8","unstructured":"McCormick A Fleming D Charlton J Royal College of General Practitioners, Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, Department of Health .Morbidity statistics from general practice. Fourth national study, 1991-1992. London: HMSO,1995."},{"key":"2025122310332479000_313.7051.207.9","unstructured":"Hennekens CH Buring JE .Epidemiology in medicine. Boston: Little, Brown,1987: 66\u201373."},{"key":"2025122310332479000_313.7051.207.10","unstructured":"Morris JA Gardner MJ .Calculating confidence intervals for relative risks, odds ratios, and standardised ratios and rates. In: Gardner MJ Altman DG , eds.Statistics with confidence. London: BMJ Publishing,1989: 50\u201363."},{"key":"2025122310332479000_313.7051.207.11","unstructured":"Royal College of General Practitioners, Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, Department of Health and Social Security .Morbidity statistics from general practice 1981-82. Third national study. London: HMSO,1986."},{"key":"2025122310332479000_313.7051.207.12","unstructured":"Central Statistical Office .25 years of Social Trends on CD-ROM. London: CSO,1995."},{"key":"2025122310332479000_313.7051.207.13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.308.6923.249","article-title":"Primary medical outside normal working hours: review of published work.","volume":"308","author":"Hallam","year":"1994","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025122310332479000_313.7051.207.14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1593","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.309.6969.1593","article-title":"Out of hours.","volume":"309","author":"Hurwitz","year":"1994","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025122310332479000_313.7051.207.15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1621","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.309.6969.1621","article-title":"Organisation of primary care services outside normal working hours.","volume":"309","author":"Hallam","year":"1994","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025122310332479000_313.7051.207.16","unstructured":"Cartwright A Anderson R .General practice revisited\u2014a second study of patients and their doctors. London: Tavistock,1981."},{"key":"2025122310332479000_313.7051.207.17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.304.6826.529","article-title":"Deprivation and general practitioner workload.","volume":"304","author":"Balarajan","year":"1992","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025122310332479000_313.7051.207.18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.309.6950.286","article-title":"Race, ethnicity, culture and science.","volume":"309","author":"McKenzie","year":"1994","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025122310332479000_313.7051.207.19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1272","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.308.6939.1272","article-title":"Using patient and general practice characteristics to explain variations in cervical smear uptake rates.","volume":"308","author":"Majeed","year":"1994","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025122310332479000_313.7051.207.20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1244","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.306.6887.1244","article-title":"Prescribing costs in dispensing practices.","volume":"306","author":"Morton-Jones","year":"1993","journal-title":"BMJ"}],"container-title":["BMJ"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/data.bmj.org\/tdm\/10.1136\/bmj.313.7051.207","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/bmj.313.7051.207","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,23]],"date-time":"2025-12-23T18:33:37Z","timestamp":1766514817000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/bmj.313.7051.207"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1996,7,27]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7051","published-online":{"date-parts":[[1996,7,27]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1996,7,27]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/bmj.313.7051.207"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.313.7051.207","relation":{},"ISSN":["0959-8138","1468-5833"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0959-8138","type":"print"},{"value":"1468-5833","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1996,7,27]]}}}