{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,5]],"date-time":"2026-06-05T05:21:42Z","timestamp":1780636902666,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"7228","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2000,1,15]]},"DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.320.7228.176","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2002,7,27]],"date-time":"2002-07-27T10:40:35Z","timestamp":1027766435000},"page":"176-177","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":54,"title":["Has the sun protection factor had its day?"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"320","author":[{"given":"B.","family":"Diffey","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"239","container-title":["BMJ"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/bmj.320.7228.176","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,25]],"date-time":"2020-09-25T19:35:42Z","timestamp":1601062542000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/bmj.320.7228.176"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2000,1,15]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7228"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.320.7228.176","relation":{},"ISSN":["0959-8138"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0959-8138","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2000,1,15]]}}}