{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,12]],"date-time":"2026-03-12T04:51:08Z","timestamp":1773291068348,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"7353","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2002,6,29]],"date-time":"2002-06-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1025308800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.bmj.com\/company\/legal-information\/terms-conditions\/legal-information\/tdm-licencepolicy"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMJ"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2002,4,4]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2002,6,29]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>Objectives:<\/jats:bold>\n                    To compare the quality of clinical care in walk-in centres with that provided in general practice and by NHS Direct.\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>Design:<\/jats:bold>\n                    Observational study involving assessment of clinicians by standardised patients.\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>Setting:<\/jats:bold>\n                    20 walk-in centres, 20 general practices, and 11 NHS Direct sites.\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>Participants:<\/jats:bold>\n                    297 consultations with standardised patients, 99 in each setting, carried out by professional role players trained to play five clinical scenarios (postcoital contraception, chest pain, sinusitis, headache, and asthma).\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>Main outcome measures:<\/jats:bold>\n                    Primary outcomes were mean scores on consensus derived checklists of essential items for the management of the clinical scenarios. Data were also collected on access to and referral by walk-in centres, general practices, and NHS Direct.\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>Results:<\/jats:bold>\n                    Walk-in centres achieved a significantly greater mean score for all scenarios combined than general practices (difference between groups 8.2, 95% confidence interval 1.7 to 14.6) and NHS Direct (10.8, 5.5 to 16.1). There was considerable between scenario variation, with walk-in centres performing particularly well on postcoital contraception and asthma scenarios. In contrast to general practices, walk-in centres and NHS Direct referred a higher proportion of patients (26% and 82%, respectively).\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:bold>Conclusion:<\/jats:bold>\n                    Walk-in centres perform adequately and safely compared with general practices and NHS Direct for the range of conditions under study, but the impact of referrals on workload of other healthcare providers requires further research.\n                  <\/jats:p>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    <jats:boxed-text position=\"float\">\n                      <jats:sec>\n                        <jats:title>What is already known on this topic<\/jats:title>\n                        <jats:p>Assessment of the quality of care provided by walk-in centres is an important part of their overall evaluation<\/jats:p>\n                        <jats:p>The one previous study to assess quality in this setting reported negative findings but was methodologically flawed<\/jats:p>\n                        <jats:p>Standardised patients are a valid and reliable method of assessment of quality of clinical care<\/jats:p>\n                      <\/jats:sec>\n                      <jats:sec>\n                        <jats:title>What this study adds<\/jats:title>\n                        <jats:p>Walk-in centres perform adequately and safely compared to general practice and NHS Direct for the range of conditions under study<\/jats:p>\n                      <\/jats:sec>\n                    <\/jats:boxed-text>\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.324.7353.1556","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2002,7,28]],"date-time":"2002-07-28T19:09:06Z","timestamp":1027883346000},"page":"1556","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":39,"title":["An observational study comparing quality of care in walk-in centres with general practice and NHS Direct using standardised patients"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"324","author":[{"given":"Clare","family":"Grant","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ruth","family":"Nicholas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Laurence","family":"Moore","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Chris","family":"Salisbury","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2002,6,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"2025122122272581000_324.7353.1556.1","first-page":"7","volume":"Jan","year":"2001","journal-title":"Health Which"},{"key":"2025122122272581000_324.7353.1556.2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.322.7291.931"},{"key":"2025122122272581000_324.7353.1556.3","first-page":"153","article-title":"To what extent do clinical notes by general practitioners reflect actual medical performance? A study using simulated patients.","volume":"44","author":"Rethans","year":"1994","journal-title":"Br J Gen Pract"},{"key":"2025122122272581000_324.7353.1556.4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"454","DOI":"10.1097\/00001888-199306000-00003","article-title":"Technical issues: Test application.","volume":"68","author":"Colliver","year":"1993","journal-title":"Acad Med"},{"key":"2025122122272581000_324.7353.1556.5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/10401339009539432"},{"key":"2025122122272581000_324.7353.1556.6","first-page":"252","article-title":"The use of a simulated patient to assess clinical practice in the management of a high risk asthmatic.","volume":"102","author":"O'Hagan","year":"1989","journal-title":"NZ Med J"},{"key":"2025122122272581000_324.7353.1556.7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1097\/00001888-199109000-00034","article-title":"Using unannounced simulated patients to evaluate sexual risk assessment and risk reduction skills of practicing physicians.","volume":"66","author":"Russell","year":"1991","journal-title":"Acad Med"},{"key":"2025122122272581000_324.7353.1556.8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-3797(18)30811-0","article-title":"Unannounced simulated patients' observations of physician STD\/HIV prevention practices.","volume":"8","author":"Russell","year":"1992","journal-title":"Am J Prev Med"},{"key":"2025122122272581000_324.7353.1556.9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-119-2-199307150-00007","article-title":"The periodic health examination provided to asymptomatic older women: an assessment using standardized patients.","volume":"119","author":"Carney","year":"1993","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"2025122122272581000_324.7353.1556.10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1097\/00006842-199403000-00008","article-title":"Patient presentation, interview content, and the detection of depression by primary care physicians.","volume":"56","author":"Badger","year":"1994","journal-title":"Psychosom Med"},{"key":"2025122122272581000_324.7353.1556.11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"432","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2923.1994.tb02554.x","article-title":"Assessing the competence of general practitioners in diagnosing generalised anxiety disorder using standardised patients.","volume":"28","author":"Shahabudin","year":"1994","journal-title":"Med Educ"},{"key":"2025122122272581000_324.7353.1556.12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/fampra\/14.1.58"},{"key":"2025122122272581000_324.7353.1556.13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.311.7001.376"},{"key":"2025122122272581000_324.7353.1556.14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2923.1991.tb00035.x","article-title":"The accuracy of standardized patient presentation.","volume":"25","author":"Tamblyn","year":"1991","journal-title":"Med Educ"},{"key":"2025122122272581000_324.7353.1556.15","unstructured":"StataCorp . Stata statistical software: release 7.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation, 2001."},{"key":"2025122122272581000_324.7353.1556.16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.324.7334.399"},{"key":"2025122122272581000_324.7353.1556.17","unstructured":"The National Evaluation of Walk-in Centres Research Team . The national evaluation of NHS walk-in centres. Bristol: Bristol University, 2001."},{"key":"2025122122272581000_324.7353.1556.18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"809","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.294.6575.809","article-title":"Simulated patients in general practice: a different look at the consultation.","volume":"294","author":"Rethans","year":"1987","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025122122272581000_324.7353.1556.19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00005650-198508000-00009"},{"key":"2025122122272581000_324.7353.1556.20","first-page":"948","article-title":"The use of simulated patients in the assessment of actual clinical performance in general practice.","volume":"99","author":"O'Hagan","year":"1986","journal-title":"NZ Med J"},{"key":"2025122122272581000_324.7353.1556.21","first-page":"94","article-title":"A method for introducing standardized (simulated) patients into general practice consultations.","volume":"41","author":"Rethans","year":"1991","journal-title":"Br J Gen Pract"},{"key":"2025122122272581000_324.7353.1556.22","first-page":"97","article-title":"Assessment of the performance of general practitioners by the use of standardized (simulated) patients.","volume":"41","author":"Rethans","year":"1991","journal-title":"Br J Gen Pract"},{"key":"2025122122272581000_324.7353.1556.23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1130","DOI":"10.1097\/00001888-200011000-00022","article-title":"Developing case-specific checklists for standardized-patient-based assessments in internal medicine: a review of the literature.","volume":"75","author":"Gorter","year":"2000","journal-title":"Acad Med"},{"key":"2025122122272581000_324.7353.1556.24","unstructured":"Review body on doctors' and dentists' remuneration, 29th report 2000. London: Stationery Office. [Cm 4243.]"},{"key":"2025122122272581000_324.7353.1556.25","unstructured":"Munro J Nicholl J O'Caithain A Knowles E Morgan A . Evaluation of NHS Direct first wave sites: final report of the phase 1 research. Sheffield: Medical Care Research Unit, University of Sheffield. 2001."}],"container-title":["BMJ"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/data.bmj.org\/tdm\/10.1136\/bmj.324.7353.1556","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/bmj.324.7353.1556","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,22]],"date-time":"2025-12-22T06:27:46Z","timestamp":1766384866000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/bmj.324.7353.1556"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2002,6,29]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7353","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2002,6,29]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2002,6,29]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/bmj.324.7353.1556"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.324.7353.1556","relation":{},"ISSN":["0959-8138","1468-5833"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0959-8138","type":"print"},{"value":"1468-5833","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2002,6,29]]}}}