{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,2]],"date-time":"2022-04-02T02:05:36Z","timestamp":1648865136542},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"jan21 3","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMJ"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,1,21]]},"DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.b192","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,1,21]],"date-time":"2009-01-21T17:24:49Z","timestamp":1232558689000},"page":"b192-b192","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Why universal BCG in UK was deemed not necessary"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"338","author":[{"given":"P. D O","family":"Davies","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"239","container-title":["BMJ"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/bmj.b192","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,26]],"date-time":"2020-09-26T00:40:35Z","timestamp":1601080835000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/bmj.b192"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2009,1,21]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"jan21 3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,1,21]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.b192","relation":{},"ISSN":["0959-8138","1468-5833"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0959-8138","type":"print"},{"value":"1468-5833","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2009,1,21]]}}}