{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,28]],"date-time":"2022-03-28T22:18:12Z","timestamp":1648505892672},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"oct26 1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMJ"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,26]]},"DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.e7249","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,26]],"date-time":"2012-10-26T10:58:25Z","timestamp":1351249105000},"page":"e7249-e7249","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["High Court overturns two GMC judgments and sends them back to be heard by new panels"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"345","author":[{"given":"C.","family":"Dyer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,26]]},"container-title":["BMJ"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/bmj.e7249","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,25]],"date-time":"2020-09-25T22:06:52Z","timestamp":1601071612000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/bmj.e7249"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,26]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"oct26 1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,26]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,26]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.e7249","relation":{},"ISSN":["1756-1833"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1756-1833","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,10,26]]}}}