{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,31]],"date-time":"2025-12-31T07:09:40Z","timestamp":1767164980030,"version":"build-2238731810"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"jun21 1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMJ"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,6,21]]},"DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.f3938","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,6,21]],"date-time":"2013-06-21T07:23:04Z","timestamp":1371799384000},"page":"f3938-f3938","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Should antibiotic prophylaxis after urinary catheter removal be standard practice?"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"346","author":[{"given":"M.","family":"Juthani-Mehta","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,6,21]]},"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.g1571","type":"correction","label":"Correction","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2014,2,13]],"date-time":"2014-02-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1392249600000}}],"container-title":["BMJ"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/bmj.f3938","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,26]],"date-time":"2020-09-26T02:18:42Z","timestamp":1601086722000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/bmj.f3938"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,6,21]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"jun21 1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,6,21]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,6,21]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.f3938","relation":{},"ISSN":["1756-1833"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1756-1833","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,6,21]]}}}