{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,29]],"date-time":"2026-05-29T14:30:37Z","timestamp":1780065037438,"version":"3.54.0"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"9","content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["BMJ Open"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,18]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title><jats:p>To compare the subsequent fertility and risk of recurrence of an ectopic pregnancy (EP) in women who had had an EP, according to the type of surgical treatment they received\u2014that is, salpingectomy, salpingostomy or tubal anastomosis.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>A retrospective cohort study was carried out between January 2003 and September 2011 of 618 patients admitted to hospital with tubal EP and who had received surgical treatment (salpingectomy, n=434; salpingostomy, n=112; and tube anastomosis, n=72). Main outcomes included the first intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) and recurrent EP.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>The crude IUP rates up to 24\u2005months after surgery were 55.5% for salpingectomy, 50.9% for salpingostomy and 40.3% for tubal anastomosis treatments. In the multivariate-adjusted model, with the patients receiving salpingectomy as the reference group, HR for patients after salpingostomy and tubal anastomosis treatments for IUP were 0.912 (95% CI 0.762 to 2.017) and 0.619 (95% CI 0.328 to 0.927), respectively. The 2-year cumulative recurrent EP rates were found to be 8.1% for salpingectomy, 6.3% for salpingostomy and 16.7% for tubal anastomosis treatments. Taking the patients receiving salpingectomy as the reference group, the patients who received tubal anastomosis had a positively higher risk of recurrent EP (HR=2.280; 95% CI 1.121 to 4.636) in univariate analysis. Adjustment for other potential confounders only slightly attenuated the HR.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p>The patients with an EP receiving tubal anastomosis treatments appeared to have a lower 2-year rate of IUP and a higher risk of recurrent EP after adjustment for other potential risk factors.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2014-007339","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,9]],"date-time":"2015-09-09T01:39:50Z","timestamp":1441762790000},"page":"e007339","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":29,"title":["Fertility outcome analysis after surgical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"5","author":[{"given":"Jingwei","family":"Li","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kailei","family":"Jiang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fujie","family":"Zhao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"2024051513325069000_5.9.e007339.1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/"},{"key":"2024051513325069000_5.9.e007339.2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0b013e31802f4f79"},{"key":"2024051513325069000_5.9.e007339.3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0b013e3182510a88","article-title":"Reproductive outcomes after medical and surgical management of ectopic pregnancy","volume":"55","author":"Juneau","year":"2012","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2024051513325069000_5.9.e007339.4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)44659-5","article-title":"Treatment of ectopic pregnancy by means of laparoscopy","volume":"33","author":"Bruhat","year":"1980","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2024051513325069000_5.9.e007339.5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)46349-1","article-title":"Treatment of interstitial ectopic pregnancy with methotrexate: report of a successful case","volume":"37","author":"Tanaka","year":"1982","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2024051513325069000_5.9.e007339.6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2010.04.002"},{"key":"2024051513325069000_5.9.e007339.7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hajenius PJ , Mol F , Mol BW , et al . Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(1):CD000324.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000324.pub2"},{"key":"2024051513325069000_5.9.e007339.8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.06.041"},{"key":"2024051513325069000_5.9.e007339.9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(97)80064-7"},{"key":"2024051513325069000_5.9.e007339.10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2003.02253.x"},{"key":"2024051513325069000_5.9.e007339.11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpag.2010.12.007","article-title":"Fertility outcomes subsequent to treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy in younger Turkish women","volume":"24","author":"Turan","year":"2011","journal-title":"J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol"},{"key":"2024051513325069000_5.9.e007339.12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1149","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-011-1858-1","article-title":"Tubal anastomosis after tubal sterilization: a review","volume":"283","author":"Deffieux","year":"2011","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"2024051513325069000_5.9.e007339.13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"453","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)54539-7","article-title":"Multifactorial analysis of fertility after conservative laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy in a series of 223 patients","volume":"56","author":"Pouly","year":"1991","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2024051513325069000_5.9.e007339.14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/"},{"key":"2024051513325069000_5.9.e007339.15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-008-0731-3"},{"key":"2024051513325069000_5.9.e007339.16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/13.11.3239"},{"key":"2024051513325069000_5.9.e007339.17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016340903188912"},{"key":"2024051513325069000_5.9.e007339.18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349609033276","article-title":"Conservative versus radical surgery for tubal pregnancy. A review","volume":"75","author":"Clausen","year":"1996","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"2024051513325069000_5.9.e007339.19","first-page":"710","article-title":"Reproductive outcome after 143 laparoscopic procedures for ectopic pregnancy","volume":"81","author":"Silva","year":"1993","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2024051513325069000_5.9.e007339.20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmn012"},{"key":"2024051513325069000_5.9.e007339.21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-009-1270-2","article-title":"Optimal treatment for patients with ectopic pregnancies and a history of fertility-reducing factors","volume":"283","author":"Becker","year":"2011","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"2024051513325069000_5.9.e007339.22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(97)00361-0"},{"key":"2024051513325069000_5.9.e007339.23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Koh CH , Janik GM . Laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: results of 40 consecutive cases. In: Program and Abstracts of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Boston, MA. 1996. doi:10.1016\/S0015-0282(97)00361-0","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(97)00361-0"},{"key":"2024051513325069000_5.9.e007339.24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.47102\/annals-acadmedsg.V39N1p22","article-title":"Microsurgical reversal of sterilisation\u2014is this still clinically relevant today?","volume":"39","author":"Tan","year":"2010","journal-title":"Ann Acad Med Singapore"},{"key":"2024051513325069000_5.9.e007339.25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"520","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2008.00969.x","article-title":"Assessment of tubal disorder as a risk factor for repeated ectopic pregnancy","volume":"35","author":"Kuroda","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"}],"container-title":["BMJ Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2014-007339","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,15]],"date-time":"2024-05-15T20:51:22Z","timestamp":1715806282000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmjopen.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2014-007339"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,9]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,9,8]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/bmjopen-2014-007339"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2014-007339","relation":{},"ISSN":["2044-6055","2044-6055"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2044-6055","type":"print"},{"value":"2044-6055","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,9]]}}}