{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,18]],"date-time":"2026-03-18T19:44:38Z","timestamp":1773863078937,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"10","content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["BMJ Open"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2016,9,20]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To compare the efficacy of direct laryngoscopy (DL), Pentax Airway Scope (PAWS) and GlideScope video laryngoscope (GVL) systems for endotracheal intubation (ETI) in various cervical immobilisation scenarios: manual in-line stabilisation (MILS), Philadelphia neck collar (PNC) (moderate limit of mouth opening) and Stifneck collar (SNC) (severe limit of mouth opening).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Design<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Randomised cross-over simulation study.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Setting and Participants<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>35 physicians who had &gt;30 successful ETI experiences at a tertiary hospital in Seoul, Korea.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Primary and secondary outcome measures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Participants performed ETI using PAWS, GVL and DL randomly in simulated MILS, PNC and SNC scenarios in our simulation centre. The end points were successful ETI and the time to complete ETI. In addition, modified Cormack-Lehane (CL) classification and pressure to teeth were recorded.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In MILS, there were no significant differences in the rate of success of ETI between the three devices: 33\/35(94.3%) for DL vs 32\/35(91.4%) for GVL vs 35\/35(100.0%) for PAWS; p=0.230). PAWS achieved successful ETI more quickly (19.8\u2005s) than DL (29.6\u2005s) and GVL (35.4\u2005s). For the PNC scenario, a higher rate of successful ETI was achieved with GVL 33\/35 (94.3%) than PAWS 29\/35 (82.9%) or DL 25\/35 (71.4%) (p=0.040). For the SNC scenario, a higher rate of successful ETI was achieved with GVL 28\/35(80.0%) than with DL 14\/35(40.0%) and PAWS 7\/35(20.0%) (p&lt;0.001). For the PNC and SNC scenarios, GVL provided a relatively good view of the glottis, but a frequent pressure to teeth occurred.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>All three devices are suitable for ETI in MILS. DL is not suitable in both neck collar scenarios. PAWS showed faster intubations in MILS, but was not suitable in the SNC scenario. GVL is most suitable in all cervical immobilisation scenarios, but may cause pressure to teeth more frequently.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-011089","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,24]],"date-time":"2016-10-24T21:28:49Z","timestamp":1477344529000},"page":"e011089","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Efficacy of various types of laryngoscope (direct, Pentax Airway Scope and GlideScope) for endotracheal intubation in various cervical immobilisation scenarios: a randomised cross-over simulation study"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"6","author":[{"given":"Jong Won","family":"Kim","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Emergency Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kyeong Ryong","family":"Lee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Emergency Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dae Young","family":"Hong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Emergency Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kwang Je","family":"Baek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Emergency Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Young Hwan","family":"Lee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Emergency Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University, Anyang-si, Korea"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sang O","family":"Park","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Emergency Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"2025120601000639000_6.10.e011089.1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1097\/ACO.0b013e3283360b4f","article-title":"Management of the airway in multi-trauma","volume":"23","author":"Dupanovic","year":"2010","journal-title":"Curr Opin Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"2025120601000639000_6.10.e011089.2","unstructured":"American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. Chapter 2 Airway and ventilatory management. In: American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. 8th edn. Advanced trauma life support for doctors, student course manual. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons, 2008:33\u20135."},{"key":"2025120601000639000_6.10.e011089.3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.1993.tb07133.x"},{"key":"2025120601000639000_6.10.e011089.4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-199911000-00015"},{"key":"2025120601000639000_6.10.e011089.5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s12630-009-9089-7"},{"key":"2025120601000639000_6.10.e011089.6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aen231"},{"key":"2025120601000639000_6.10.e011089.7","first-page":"307","article-title":"Airway management in trauma","volume":"75","author":"Langeron","year":"2009","journal-title":"Minerva Anestesiol"},{"key":"2025120601000639000_6.10.e011089.8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aen002"},{"key":"2025120601000639000_6.10.e011089.9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2009.06075.x"},{"key":"2025120601000639000_6.10.e011089.10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/emj.2004.020552"},{"key":"2025120601000639000_6.10.e011089.11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.annemergmed.2007.01.009"},{"key":"2025120601000639000_6.10.e011089.12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/ALN.0b013e318190b556"},{"key":"2025120601000639000_6.10.e011089.13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3171\/jns.2001.94.2.0265"},{"key":"2025120601000639000_6.10.e011089.14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-199607000-00005"},{"key":"2025120601000639000_6.10.e011089.15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-199404000-00015"},{"key":"2025120601000639000_6.10.e011089.16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"544","DOI":"10.1097\/EJA.0b013e3283615b80","article-title":"Comparison of the Macintosh, McCoy, Airtraq laryngoscopes and the intubating laryngeal mask airway in a difficult airway with manual in-line stabilisation: a cross-over simulation-based study","volume":"30","author":"Sherren","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"2025120601000639000_6.10.e011089.17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aep164"},{"key":"2025120601000639000_6.10.e011089.18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.1994.tb04254.x"},{"key":"2025120601000639000_6.10.e011089.19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aeh248"},{"key":"2025120601000639000_6.10.e011089.20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/TA.0b013e3181c4529e"},{"key":"2025120601000639000_6.10.e011089.21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.13384","article-title":"A randomised cross-over trial comparing the McGrath(\u00ae) Series 5 videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with cervical spine immobilisation","volume":"71","author":"Foulds","year":"2016","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"key":"2025120601000639000_6.10.e011089.22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/emermed-2011-200899"},{"key":"2025120601000639000_6.10.e011089.23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aei190"},{"key":"2025120601000639000_6.10.e011089.24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.anclin.2012.10.001"}],"container-title":["BMJ Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-011089","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,6]],"date-time":"2025-12-06T09:00:24Z","timestamp":1765011624000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmjopen.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-011089"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,10]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,10,24]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-011089"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-011089","relation":{},"ISSN":["2044-6055","2044-6055"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2044-6055","type":"print"},{"value":"2044-6055","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,10]]}}}