{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,31]],"date-time":"2025-10-31T16:57:30Z","timestamp":1761929850529,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"11","content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["BMJ Open"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2016,9,14]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>Optimising uptake of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is important to achieve projected health outcomes. Population-based screening by flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) was introduced in England in 2013 (NHS Bowel scope screening). Little is known about reactions to the invitation to participate in FS screening, as offered within the context of the Bowel scope programme. We aimed to investigate responses to the screening invitation to inform understanding of decision-making, particularly in relation to non-participation in screening.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design<\/jats:title><jats:p>Qualitative analysis of semistructured in-depth interviews and written accounts.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Participants and setting<\/jats:title><jats:p>People from 31 general practices in the North East and East of England invited to attend FS screening as part of NHS Bowel scope screening programme were sent invitations to take part in the study. We purposively sampled interviewees to ensure a range of accounts in terms of beliefs, screening attendance, sex and geographical location.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>20 screeners and 25 non-screeners were interviewed. Written responses describing reasons for, and circumstances surrounding, non-participation from a further 28 non-screeners were included in the analysis. Thematic analysis identified a range of reactions to the screening invitation, decision-making processes and barriers to participation. These include a perceived or actual lack of need; inability to attend; anxiety and fear about bowel preparation, procedures or hospital; inability or reluctance to self-administer an enema; beliefs about low susceptibility to bowel cancer or treatment and understanding of harm and benefits. The strength, rather than presence, of concerns about the test and perceived need for reassurance were important in the decision to participate for screeners and non-screeners. Decision-making occurs within the context of previous experiences and day-to-day life.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p>Understanding the reasons for non-participation in FS screening can help inform strategies to improve uptake and may be transferable to other screening programmes.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-012304","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,12]],"date-time":"2016-11-12T03:44:14Z","timestamp":1478922254000},"page":"e012304","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":21,"title":["Concerns, perceived need and competing priorities: a qualitative exploration of decision-making and non-participation in a population-based flexible sigmoidoscopy screening programme to prevent colorectal cancer"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"6","author":[{"given":"N","family":"Hall","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"L","family":"Birt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"C J","family":"Rees","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7191-6476","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"F M","family":"Walter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"S","family":"Elliot","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M","family":"Ritchie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"D","family":"Weller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"G","family":"Rubin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(10)60551-X"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1572-0241.2008.01875.x"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"681","DOI":"10.1007\/s10620-015-3600-5","article-title":"The impact of screening on colorectal cancer mortality and incidence: has it really made a difference?","volume":"60","author":"Zauber","year":"2015","journal-title":"Dig Dis Sci"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0034-1365383"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/bjc.2015.76"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18466","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v20.i48.18466","article-title":"Reduced incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer with flexible-sigmoidoscopy screening: a meta-analysis","volume":"20","author":"Shroff","year":"2014","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0969141315604659"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2321","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2013.03.007","article-title":"What influences the decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy?","volume":"49","author":"van Dam","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/dyr008"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2008.02.009"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/epirev\/mxq018"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e008266","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2015-008266","article-title":"Reasons for non-participation in the Northern Ireland Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study","volume":"5","author":"Bradley","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2015.07.026","article-title":"Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (ARTICS): a randomised controlled trial","volume":"142","author":"O'Carroll","year":"2015","journal-title":"Soc Sci Med"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/hex.12157"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1038\/bjc.2015.413","article-title":"Impact of general practice endorsement on the social gradient in uptake in bowel cancer screening","volume":"114","author":"Raine","year":"2016","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)01154-X"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/gutjnl-2014-308081"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1006\/pmed.2000.0725"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s12160-008-9034-y"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0277-9536(00)00375-0"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/jms.7.2.99"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-14-0967"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/jms.9.3.104"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.24","unstructured":"Patton MQ . Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage, 2002."},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1258\/jms.2008.007112"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"751","DOI":"10.1038\/bjc.2016.43","article-title":"Use of 12 months\u2019 self-referal reminder to facilitate uptake of bowel scope (flexible sigmoidoscopy) screening in previous non-responders: a London-based feasibility study","volume":"114","author":"Kerrison","year":"2016","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/89.19.1406"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"901","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2015.03.023","article-title":"Socio-psychological factors in the expanded health belief model and subsequent colorectal cancer screening","volume":"98","author":"Sohler","year":"2015","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Leventhal H , Nerenz DR , Purse J . Illness representations and coping with health threats. In: Baun A , Taylor SE , Singer JE , eds. Handbook of psychology and health: social psychological aspects of health. Hillsdale: Earlbaum, 1984:219\u201352.","DOI":"10.1201\/9781003044307-9"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1049732313501890"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1705","DOI":"10.1038\/bjc.2014.125","article-title":"Reasons for non-uptake and subsequent participation in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study","volume":"10","author":"Palmer","year":"2014","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1258\/096914107781261972"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.34","first-page":"295","article-title":"Bridging the gap between evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicine","volume":"42","author":"O'Donnell","year":"2001","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"key":"2024051610245967000_6.11.e012304.35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2007.04.009"}],"container-title":["BMJ Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-012304","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,16]],"date-time":"2024-05-16T17:33:53Z","timestamp":1715880833000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmjopen.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-012304"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]},"references-count":35,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,11]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-012304"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-012304","relation":{},"ISSN":["2044-6055","2044-6055"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2044-6055"},{"type":"electronic","value":"2044-6055"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,11]]}}}