{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,14]],"date-time":"2025-12-14T12:34:32Z","timestamp":1765715672911,"version":"3.48.0"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"12","content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["BMJ Open"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,4]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Ileal conduit urinary diversion (ICUD) is the most common procedure after radical cystectomy. Although complications have been reported, few patients with ICUD and bladder preservation controls have been available for long-term follow-up. This study compared the long-term effect of structural changes after cystectomy with ICUD to that in bladder preservation controls.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Design<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A retrospective nationwide cohort study.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Setting<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Data retrieved from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Participants<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The National Health Insurance database was explored for patients diagnosed with bladder cancer between 1997 and 2006. Only cancer-free patients without chemotherapy and other types of urinary diversion who lived for &gt;5 years were included in the analysis.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Outcome measures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Patient characteristics, comorbidity and postoperative urinary tract disease were statistically analysed and compared. Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the incidence rates of outcomes after adjustment for covariates. Propensity scores analysis was used to balance the clinical parameters between groups. The primary outcomes were postoperative new-onset urinary tract disease such as urinary tract infection (UTI), UTI with septicaemia and chronic kidney disease (CKD), or calculus of kidney and ureter.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>There were 11\u2009185 patients included in our cohort, among which 703 (6.3%) and 10\u2009482 (93.7%) patients received ICUD and bladder preservation procedure, respectively. Compared with patients who only underwent a bladder preservation procedure, those who had undergone ICUD after cystectomy were independently associated with postoperative de novo urinary tract disease. Propensity score analysis (1:4) was also performed. ICUD contributed to significantly higher new-onset UTI, UTI with sepsis and CKD (HR=1.30, 3.16, 1.35, respectively) compared with bladder preservation procedure after adjustment for age, gender and comorbidities.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>ICUD after radical cystectomy was associated with a higher incidence of UTI, UTI with septicaemia and CKD during long-term follow-up than the incidences following a bladder preservation procedure.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-023136","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,10]],"date-time":"2018-12-10T07:15:48Z","timestamp":1544426148000},"page":"e023136","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Long-term urinary tract effect of ileal conduit after radical cystectomy compared with bladder preservation: a nationwide, population-based cohort study with propensity score-matching analysis"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"Yu Liang","family":"Liu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hao-Lun","family":"Luo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Po-Huang","family":"Chiang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan"},{"name":"Department of Health Risk Management, College of Management, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan"},{"name":"Institute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yen-Chen","family":"Chang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Po-Hui","family":"Chiang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"2025121404324977000_8.12.e023136.1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2012.08.009"},{"key":"2025121404324977000_8.12.e023136.2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"356","DOI":"10.1007\/s00261-015-0576-8","article-title":"Pictorial review of orthotopic neobladder reconstruction: indication, normal postsurgical anatomy, and complications","volume":"41","author":"Kubota","year":"2016","journal-title":"Abdom Radiol"},{"key":"2025121404324977000_8.12.e023136.3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.12121","article-title":"Urinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: options, patient selection, and outcomes","volume":"113","author":"Lee","year":"2014","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"2025121404324977000_8.12.e023136.4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"775","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-018-2181-2","article-title":"Urinary tract infections following radical cystectomy and urinary diversion: a review of 1133 patients","volume":"36","author":"Clifford","year":"2018","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"key":"2025121404324977000_8.12.e023136.5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2011.10194.x","article-title":"Management of urolithiasis in patients after urinary diversions","volume":"108","author":"Okhunov","year":"2011","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"2025121404324977000_8.12.e023136.6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2013.09.011","article-title":"Long-term renal function outcomes after radical cystectomy","volume":"191","author":"Eisenberg","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"2025121404324977000_8.12.e023136.7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2010.09.096"},{"key":"2025121404324977000_8.12.e023136.8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2006.02.015","article-title":"Long-term effects of ileal conduit urinary diversion on upper urinary tract in bladder cancer","volume":"68","author":"Yang","year":"2006","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"2025121404324977000_8.12.e023136.9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jfma.2013.09.009"},{"key":"2025121404324977000_8.12.e023136.10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"509.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2010.08.019","article-title":"Tolerance of bacteriuria after urinary diversion is linked to antimicrobial peptide activity","volume":"77","author":"Townes","year":"2011","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"2025121404324977000_8.12.e023136.11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"498","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2011.12.006","article-title":"Variables affecting long-term maintenance of renal function following ileal based urinary diversion","volume":"61","author":"Ku","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"2025121404324977000_8.12.e023136.12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1464-410x.1999.00200.x","article-title":"Does the position of the patient affect the presence and\/or degree of reflux in an ileal conduit urinary diversion?","volume":"84","author":"Baltaci","year":"1999","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"2025121404324977000_8.12.e023136.13","first-page":"137","article-title":"Sepsis-induced cardiac mitochondrial damage and potential therapeutic interventions in the elderly","volume":"5","author":"Zang","year":"2014","journal-title":"Aging Dis"},{"key":"2025121404324977000_8.12.e023136.14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1442-2042.2008.02050.x"},{"key":"2025121404324977000_8.12.e023136.15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.1995.tb07776.x"},{"key":"2025121404324977000_8.12.e023136.16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2006.07.146"},{"key":"2025121404324977000_8.12.e023136.17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-0690(18)30113-7","article-title":"Changes in renal function with aging","volume":"14","author":"Beck","year":"1998","journal-title":"Clin Geriatr Med"},{"key":"2025121404324977000_8.12.e023136.18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/j.ajkd.2007.12.012"},{"key":"2025121404324977000_8.12.e023136.19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/j.ajkd.2005.09.027"},{"key":"2025121404324977000_8.12.e023136.20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/j.ajkd.2008.12.036"}],"container-title":["BMJ Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-023136","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,14]],"date-time":"2025-12-14T12:32:59Z","timestamp":1765715579000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmjopen.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-023136"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,12]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,9]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-023136"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-023136","relation":{},"ISSN":["2044-6055","2044-6055"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2044-6055"},{"type":"electronic","value":"2044-6055"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,12]]}}}