{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,29]],"date-time":"2026-10-29T08:35:57Z","timestamp":1793262957303,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"7","funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000664","name":"Health Technology Assessment Programme","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000664","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["BMJ Open"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Three types of central venous access devices (CVADs) are routinely used in the delivery of intravenous systemic anticancer therapy (SACT): peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), subcutaneously tunnelled central catheters (Hickman-type devices) and totally implantable chest wall ports (Ports). This qualitative study, nested within a multicentre, randomised controlled trial, sought to explore patient acceptability and experiences of the three devices.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>Design<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Eight focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>Setting<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Six outpatient cancer treatment centres in the UK.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>Participants<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Forty-two patients (20 female, mean age 61.7 years) who had taken part or were taking part in the broader trial.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>Intervention<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>As part of the larger, randomised controlled trial, participants had been randomly assigned one of three CVADs for the administration of SACT.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Attitudes towards all three devices were positive, with patients viewing their CVAD as part of their treatment and recovery. Participants with PICCs and Hickmans tended to compare their device favourably with peripheral cannulation. By comparison, participants with Ports consistently compared their device with PICCs and Hickmans, emphasising the perceived superiority of Ports. Ports were perceived to offer unique psychological benefits, including a greater sense of freedom and less intrusion in the context of personal relationships.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Patient experiences and preferences have not been systematically used to inform policy and practice regarding CVAD availability and selection. Our research identified patterns of patient device preferences that favoured Ports, although this was not universal. Results of this study could improve support for patients and offer greater scope for incorporating patient perspectives into decision-making processes.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>Trial registration number<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>\n<jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" xlink:href=\"NCT44504648\" ext-link-type=\"clintrialgov\" specific-use=\"clinicaltrial results\">NCT44504648<\/jats:ext-link>\n<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-026077","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,15]],"date-time":"2023-05-15T17:47:20Z","timestamp":1684172840000},"page":"e026077","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":33,"title":["Patient acceptability of three different central venous access devices for the delivery of systemic anticancer therapy: a qualitative study"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"9","clinical-trial-number":[{"clinical-trial-number":"nct44504648","registry":"10.18810\/clinical-trials-gov","type":"results"}],"author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7279-563X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Caoimhe","family":"Ryan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hannah","family":"Hesselgreaves","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Olivia","family":"Wu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jonathan","family":"Moss","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"James","family":"Paul","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Judith","family":"Dixon-Hughes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Evi","family":"Germeni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"2023050822112733000_9.7.e026077.1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1181","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-015-2900-9","article-title":"Venous access: the patient experience","volume":"24","author":"Robinson-Reilly","year":"2016","journal-title":"Support Care Cancer"},{"key":"2023050822112733000_9.7.e026077.2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.170.6.9609182"},{"key":"2023050822112733000_9.7.e026077.3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S4","DOI":"10.12968\/bjon.2016.25.8.S4","article-title":"Proactive PICC placement: evaluating the patient experience","volume":"25","author":"Harrold","year":"2016","journal-title":"Br J Nurs"},{"key":"2023050822112733000_9.7.e026077.4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1177\/1084822315603678","article-title":"More benefits than problems","volume":"28","author":"K\u00e4llenius Edstr\u00f6m","year":"2016","journal-title":"Home Health Care Manag Pract"},{"key":"2023050822112733000_9.7.e026077.5","first-page":"21","article-title":"An analysis of long-term venous access catheters in cancer patients:experience from a tertiary care centre in India","volume":"48","author":"Shukla","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Postgrad Med"},{"key":"2023050822112733000_9.7.e026077.6","first-page":"47","article-title":"Long-term venous access with a Hickman catheter: complications and patient satisfaction","volume":"42","author":"Claessen","year":"1990","journal-title":"Neth J Surg"},{"key":"2023050822112733000_9.7.e026077.7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1177\/112972980100200406","article-title":"Totally implantable central venous access: 15 years' experience in a single unit","volume":"2","author":"Craus","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Vasc Access"},{"key":"2023050822112733000_9.7.e026077.8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2008.01.020"},{"key":"2023050822112733000_9.7.e026077.9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2354.2011.01275.x","article-title":"Satisfaction and quality of life: a survey-based assessment in patients with a totally implantable venous port system","volume":"21","author":"Nagel","year":"2012","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer Care"},{"key":"2023050822112733000_9.7.e026077.10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2006.08.003"},{"key":"2023050822112733000_9.7.e026077.11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1084","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-013-2378-x","article-title":"Morbidity of chemotherapy administration and satisfaction in breast cancer patients: a comparative study of totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) versus peripheral venous access usage","volume":"38","author":"Singh","year":"2014","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"2023050822112733000_9.7.e026077.12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"505","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-012-1544-2","article-title":"Percutaneous image-guided implantation of totally implantable venous access ports in the forearm or the chest? A patients' point of view","volume":"21","author":"Goltz","year":"2013","journal-title":"Support Care Cancer"},{"key":"2023050822112733000_9.7.e026077.13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-013-1941-1"},{"key":"2023050822112733000_9.7.e026077.14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"979","DOI":"10.1038\/bjc.2016.76","article-title":"Hickman catheter and implantable port devices for the delivery of chemotherapy: a phase II randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation","volume":"114","author":"Wu","year":"2016","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"key":"2023050822112733000_9.7.e026077.15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-008-0449-6"},{"key":"2023050822112733000_9.7.e026077.16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/intqhc\/mzm042"},{"key":"2023050822112733000_9.7.e026077.17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Morgan D . Focus groups as qualitative research. Thousand Oaks California: SAGE Publications, Inc, 1997.","DOI":"10.4135\/9781412984287"},{"key":"2023050822112733000_9.7.e026077.18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa"},{"key":"2023050822112733000_9.7.e026077.19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.5301\/jva.5000447","article-title":"Exploring attitudes towards a randomised controlled trial of venous access devices \u2013 a nested pre-trial qualitative study","volume":"16","author":"Ritchie","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Vasc Access"},{"key":"2023050822112733000_9.7.e026077.20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-017-3815-4","article-title":"Living with a peripherally inserted central catheter: the perspective of cancer outpatients-a qualitative study","volume":"26","author":"Par\u00e1s-Bravo","year":"2018","journal-title":"Support Care Cancer"},{"key":"2023050822112733000_9.7.e026077.21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/10376178.2014.11081923"},{"key":"2023050822112733000_9.7.e026077.22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1084822314566300."},{"key":"2023050822112733000_9.7.e026077.23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1032","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2015.04.443","article-title":"Exploring patient involvement in decision making for vascular procedures","volume":"62","author":"Corriere","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Vasc Surg"}],"container-title":["BMJ Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-026077","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,15]],"date-time":"2023-05-15T17:47:36Z","timestamp":1684172856000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmjopen.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-026077"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,7]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,9]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-026077"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-026077","relation":{},"ISSN":["2044-6055","2044-6055"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2044-6055","type":"print"},{"value":"2044-6055","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,7]]}}}