{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,20]],"date-time":"2026-01-20T05:15:59Z","timestamp":1768886159932,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":50,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"2","funder":[{"name":"The implementation of the database was funded for the first year by a grant from the GREAT Network, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, St. Michael\u2019s Hospital, Toronto."},{"name":"The implementation of the database was funded for the first year by a grant from the GREAT Network, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, St. Michael\u2019s Hospital, Toronto."}],"content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["BMJ Open"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,20]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title><jats:p>This study aimed at describing the use of a prospective database on hospital deliveries for analysing caesarean section (CS) practices according to the WHO manual for Robson classification, and for developing recommendations for improving the quality of care (QoC).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design<\/jats:title><jats:p>Observational study.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Setting<\/jats:title><jats:p>University Obstetric Unit at De Soysa Hospital for Women, the largest maternity unit in Sri Lanka.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Data collection and analysis<\/jats:title><jats:p>For each childbirth, 150 variables were routinely collected in a standardised form and entered into a database. Data were routinely monitored for ensuring quality. Information on deliveries occurring from July 2015 to June 2017 were analysed according the WHO Robson classification manual. Findings were discussed internally to develop quality improvement recommendations.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>7504 women delivered in the hospital during the study period and at least one maternal or fetal pathological condition was reported in 2845 (37.9%). The CS rate was 30.0%, with 11.9% CS being performed prelabour. According to the Robson classification, Group 3 and Group 1 were the most represented groups (27.0% and 23.1% of population, respectively). The major contributors to the CS rate were group 5 (29.6%), group 1 (14.0%), group 2a (13.3%) and group 10 (11.5%). The most commonly reported indications for CS included abnormal cardiotocography\/suspected fetal distress, past CS and failed progress of labour or failed induction. These suggested the need for further discussion on CS practices. Overall, 18 recommendations were agreed on. Besides updating protocols and hands-on training, activities agreed on included monitoring and supervision, criterion-based audits, risk management meetings and appropriate information for patients, and recommendations to further improve the quality of data.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p>This study provides an example on how the WHO manual for Robson classification can be used in an action-oriented manner for developing recommendations for improving the QoC, and the quality of data collected.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-027317","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,8]],"date-time":"2019-02-08T21:56:43Z","timestamp":1549663003000},"page":"e027317","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":21,"title":["Implementation of the WHO manual for Robson classification: an example from Sri Lanka using a local database for developing quality improvement recommendations"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"Hemantha","family":"Senanayake","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Monica","family":"Piccoli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4741-4628","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Emanuelle Pessa","family":"Valente","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Caterina","family":"Businelli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Rishard","family":"Mohamed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Roshini","family":"Fernando","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anshumalie","family":"Sakalasuriya","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Fathima Reshma","family":"Ihsan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Benedetta","family":"Covi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Humphrey","family":"Wanzira","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Marzia","family":"Lazzerini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.1","unstructured":"World Health Organization. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. Geneva. 2015 http:\/\/apps.who.int\/iris\/bitstream\/10665\/161442\/1\/WHO_RHR_15.02_eng.pdf (accessed 16 October 2018)."},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)31928-7"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1017\/S0965539501000122","article-title":"Classification of caesarean sections","volume":"12","author":"Robson","year":"2001","journal-title":"Fetal Matern Med Rev"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.4","unstructured":"World Health Organization. Robson Classification: Implementation Manual,\u00a0Geneva. 2017 http:\/\/www.who.int\/reproductivehealth\/publications\/maternal_perinatal_health\/robson-classification\/en\/ (accessed 16 Oct 2018)."},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.4038\/sljog.v34i1.4816","article-title":"The rising trend in caesarean section rates: should we and can we reduce it?","volume":"34","author":"Goonewardene","year":"2012","journal-title":"Sri Lanka Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.6","unstructured":"Bulletin AH . Sri Lanka. Medical Statistics Unit Ministry of Health, Nutrition and Indigenous Medicine\u00a0ISBN 978-955-702-045-7. 2015 http:\/\/www.health.gov.lk\/moh_final\/english\/others.php?pid=110."},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.4038\/cmj.v62i3.8518","article-title":"Analysis of high caesarean section rates: the second step after audits using the Ten Group Classification System","volume":"62","author":"Goonewardene","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ceylon Med J"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/heapol\/czu062"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.9","unstructured":"Lazzerini M , Senanayake H , Mohamed R , et al . Implementation of an individual-patient prospective database of hospital births in Sri Lanka and its use for improving quality of care. BMJ Open."},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.004"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e260","DOI":"10.1016\/S2214-109X(15)70094-X","article-title":"Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys","volume":"3","author":"Vogel","year":"2015","journal-title":"Lancet Glob Health"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"754","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13520","article-title":"Caesarean section rates in subgroups of women and perinatal outcomes","volume":"123","author":"Zhang","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14774","article-title":"Audit and feedback using the Robson classification to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review","volume":"125","author":"Boatin","year":"2018","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.14","first-page":"35","article-title":"There\u2019s a S.M.A.R.T. Way to Write Management\u2019s Goals and Objectives","volume":"70","author":"Doran","year":"1981","journal-title":"Management Review"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(03)15268-3"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.16","unstructured":"National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. Preventing type 2 diabetes risk: identification and interventions for individuals at high risk. 2012 https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/PH38\/chapter\/Recommendations#risk-assessment (accessed 16 Oct 2018)."},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"607","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13108","article-title":"Cesarean section trends in the Nordic Countries - a comparative analysis with the Robson classification","volume":"96","author":"Pyyk\u00f6nen","year":"2017","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2017-016192","article-title":"A method to assess obstetric outcomes using the 10-Group Classification System: a quantitative descriptive study","volume":"7","author":"Rossen","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"535","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ogc.2017.07.001","article-title":"Defining and Managing Normal and Abnormal First Stage of Labor","volume":"44","author":"Rhoades","year":"2017","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182952242","article-title":"Primary cesarean delivery in the United States","volume":"122","author":"Boyle","year":"2013","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.21","unstructured":"Thomas J , Paranjothy S . Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit, National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report: RCOG Press, 2001."},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S23","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.04.026","article-title":"Quality assurance: The 10-Group Classification System (Robson classification), induction of labor, and cesarean delivery","volume":"131","author":"Robson","year":"2015","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13199","article-title":"Stabilising the caesarean rate: which target population?","volume":"122","author":"Le Ray","year":"2015","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.03.030","article-title":"Identification of obstetric targets for reducing cesarean section rate using the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary level hospital","volume":"189","author":"Triunfo","year":"2015","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.11.012","article-title":"Rate of caesarean sections according to the Robson\u00a0classification: Analysis in a French perinatal network \u2013 Interest and limitations of the French medico-administrative data (PMSI)","volume":"47","author":"Lafitte","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"348","DOI":"10.5694\/mja13.10279","article-title":"Unexplained variation in hospital caesarean section rates","volume":"199","author":"Lee","year":"2013","journal-title":"Med J Aust"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0062364","article-title":"The application of the Ten Group classification system (TGCS) in caesarean delivery case mix adjustment. A multicenter prospective study","volume":"8","author":"Maso","year":"2013","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"432","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-017-1625-9","article-title":"Implementation of the Robson classification in clinical practice:Lithuania\u2019s experience","volume":"17","author":"Kacerauskiene","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"976","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)35412-3","article-title":"Classification of caesarean sections in Canada: the Modified Robson criteria","volume":"34","author":"Farine","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12263","article-title":"Results of implementation of a hospital-based strategy to reduce cesarean delivery among low-risk women in Canada","volume":"139","author":"Shoemaker","year":"2017","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"866","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13846","article-title":"Time to optimise and enforce training in interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocograph","volume":"123","author":"Ugwumadu","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.32","unstructured":"WHO. WHO recommendations for induction of labour. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2011. Department of Reproductive Health and Research. http:\/\/www.who.int\/reproductivehealth\/publications\/maternal_perinatal_health\/9789241501156\/en\/. (accessed 16 Oct 2018)."},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0065612","article-title":"Patterns and Outcomes of Induction of Labour in Africa and Asia: a secondary analysis of the WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Neonatal Health","volume":"8","author":"Vogel","year":"2013","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.04.004","article-title":"Induction of labor at full term in uncomplicated singleton gestations: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"213","author":"Saccone","year":"2015","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.05.026","article-title":"The 10-Group Classification System-a new way of thinking","volume":"219","author":"Robson","year":"2018","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1741-7015-8-71"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"490","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)61870-5","article-title":"Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007\u201308","volume":"375","author":"Lumbiganon","year":"2010","journal-title":"The Lancet"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-018-4742-4","article-title":"Non-obstetrical indications for cesarean section: a state-of-the-art review","volume":"298","author":"Venturella","year":"2018","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"414","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.08.009","article-title":"An analysis of the indications for cesarean section in a teaching hospital in China","volume":"170","author":"Gao","year":"2013","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1111\/ppe.12484","article-title":"Differences in caesarean rates across women\u2019s socio-economic status by diverse obstetric indications: Cross-sectional study","volume":"32","author":"Adhikari","year":"2018","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-13-99","article-title":"Regional variation in caesarean deliveries in Germany and its causes","volume":"13","author":"Mikolajczyk","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1186\/s12978-016-0228-7","article-title":"Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth","volume":"13","author":"Nakamura-Pereira","year":"2016","journal-title":"Reprod Health"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e894","DOI":"10.1016\/S2214-109X(18)30241-9","article-title":"An approach to identify a minimum and rational proportion of caesarean sections in resource-poor settings: a global network study","volume":"6","author":"Beliz\u00e1n","year":"2018","journal-title":"Lancet Glob Health"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1163","DOI":"10.1016\/S2214-109X(18)30398-X","article-title":"Effectiveness of strategies to improve health-care provider practices in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review","volume":"6","author":"Rowe","year":"2018","journal-title":"Lancet Glob Health"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2017-021281","article-title":"Facilitators and barriers to the effective implementation of the individual maternal near-miss case reviews in low\/middle-income countries: a systematic review of qualitative studies","volume":"8","author":"Lazzerini","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2017-019787","article-title":"Effectiveness of the facility-based maternal near-miss case reviews in improving maternal and newborn quality of care in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review","volume":"8","author":"Lazzerini","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.2471\/BLT.16.176982","article-title":"Improving the quality of hospital care for children by supportive supervision: a cluster randomized trial, Kyrgyzstan","volume":"95","author":"Lazzerini","year":"2017","journal-title":"Bull World Health Organ"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2017-017696","article-title":"What is the quality of the maternal near-miss case reviews in WHO European Region? Cross-sectional study in Armenia, Georgia, Latvia, Republic of Moldova and Uzbekistan","volume":"8","author":"Bacci","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"2024052011575063000_9.2.e027317.50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-018-2040-6","article-title":"Experience with a context-specific modified WHO safe childbirth checklist at two tertiary care settings in Sri Lanka","volume":"18","author":"Senanayake","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"}],"container-title":["BMJ Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-027317","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,20]],"date-time":"2024-05-20T19:15:33Z","timestamp":1716232533000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmjopen.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-027317"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]},"references-count":50,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-027317"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-027317","relation":{},"ISSN":["2044-6055","2044-6055"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2044-6055","type":"print"},{"value":"2044-6055","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]}}}