{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,8]],"date-time":"2026-07-08T00:25:51Z","timestamp":1783470351686,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":83,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"11","funder":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National University Hospital, Singapore"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["BMJ Open"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,24]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Labour induction in women with a previous caesarean delivery currently uses vaginal prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), which carries the risks of uterine hyperstimulation and scar rupture. We aim to compare the efficacy of mechanical labour induction using a transcervically applied Foley catheter balloon (FCB) with PGE2 in affected women attempting trial of labour after caesarean (TOLAC).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods and analysis<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This single-centre non-inferiority prospective, randomised, open, blinded-endpoint study conducted at an academic maternity unit in Singapore will recruit a total of 100 women with one previous uncomplicated caesarean section and no contraindications to vaginal delivery. Eligible consented participants with term singleton pregnancies and unfavourable cervical scores (\u22645) requiring labour induction undergo stratified randomisation based on parity and are assigned either FCB (n=50) or PGE2 (n=50). Treatments are applied for up to 12\u2009hours with serial monitoring of the mother and the fetus and serial assessment for improved cervical scores. If the cervix is still unfavourable, participants are allowed a further 12\u2009hours\u2019 observation for cervical ripening. Active labour is initiated by amniotomy at cervical scores of \u22656. The primary outcome is the rate of change in the cervical score, and secondary outcomes include active labour within 24\u2009hours of induction, vaginal delivery, time-to-delivery interval and uterine hyperstimulation. All analyses will be intention-to-treat. The data generated in this trial may guide a change in practice towards mechanical labour induction if this proves efficient and safer for women attempting TOLAC compared with PGE2, to improve labour management in this high-risk population.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Ethics and dissemination<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Ethical approval is granted by the Domain Specific Review Board (Domain D) of the National Healthcare Group, Singapore. All adverse events will be reported within 24\u2009hours of notification for assessment of causality. Data will be published and will be available for future meta-analyses.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Trial registration number<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" ext-link-type=\"clintrialgov\" xlink:href=\"NCT03471858\">NCT03471858<\/jats:ext-link>\n                      ; Pre-results.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2019-028896","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,7]],"date-time":"2019-11-07T08:06:17Z","timestamp":1573113977000},"page":"e028896","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["MEchanical DIlatation of the Cervix\u00ad\u00ad in a Scarred uterus (MEDICS): the study protocol of a randomised controlled trial comparing a single cervical catheter balloon and prostaglandin PGE2 for cervical ripening and labour induction following caesarean delivery"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"9","clinical-trial-number":[{"clinical-trial-number":"nct03471858","registry":"10.18810\/clinical-trials-gov"}],"author":[{"given":"Soe-Na","family":"Choo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Abhiram","family":"Kanneganti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Muhammad Nur Dinie Bin","family":"Abdul Aziz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Leta","family":"Loh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Carol","family":"Hargreaves","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Data Analytics Consulting Centre, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vikneswaran","family":"Gopal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Data Analytics Consulting Centre, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Arijit","family":"Biswas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore"},{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yiong Huak","family":"Chan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Biostatistics Unit, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ida Suzani","family":"Ismail","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1185-715X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Claudia","family":"Chi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Citra","family":"Mattar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore"},{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0148343","article-title":"The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014","volume":"11","author":"Betr\u00e1n","year":"2016","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"667","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13526","article-title":"Who statement on caesarean section rates","volume":"123","author":"Betran","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG: Int J Obstet Gy"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1422","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2012.01529.x","article-title":"Changing trends of cesarean section births by the Robson ten group classification in a tertiary teaching hospital","volume":"91","author":"Chong","year":"2012","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.4","first-page":"457","article-title":"Caesarean section rates in teaching hospitals of Tehran: 1999-2003","volume":"13","author":"Moini","year":"2007","journal-title":"East Mediterr Health J"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.5","first-page":"255","article-title":"Examining stratified cesarean section rates using Robson classification system at Tribhuvan university teaching hospital","volume":"11","author":"Amatya","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Nepal Health Res Counc"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181df925f"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-014-3444-9"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.9","unstructured":"Royal_College_of_Obstetricans_and_Gynaecologists . Birth after previous caesarean birth (Green-top guideline No. 45). Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists 2015."},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-200608000-00045"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.1053\/j.semperi.2010.05.004","article-title":"Evaluating professional Society guidelines on vaginal birth after cesarean","volume":"34","author":"Bujold","year":"2010","journal-title":"Semin Perinatol"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"The_American_College_of_Obstetricians_and_Gynecologists . ACOG: practice Bulletin: vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: Obstet Gynecol, 2017: e217\u201333.","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002398"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.13","unstructured":"Royal_Australian_and_New_Zealand_College_of_Obstetricians_and_Gynaecologists . Birth after previous caesarean section, 2018."},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.14","unstructured":"The_National_Institute_for_Health_and_Care_Excellence . National collaborating centre for women's and children's health (UK). induction of labour. NICE clinical guidelines No. 70. London: RCOG Press, 2008."},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2005.03.015"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200107053450101"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1552-6909.2012.01388.x","article-title":"Trial of labor and vaginal delivery rates in women with a prior cesarean","volume":"41","author":"Eden","year":"2012","journal-title":"Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.18","unstructured":"World Health Organization . Who recommendations for induction of labour. Geneva, 2011."},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"805","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3182114ad2","article-title":"Using a simplified bishop score to predict vaginal delivery","volume":"117","author":"Laughon","year":"2011","journal-title":"Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.20","unstructured":"Royal_College_of_Obstetricians_and_Gynaecologists . Induction of labour. Evidence-based Clinical Guideline Number 2001;9."},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1985.tb00641.x"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"440","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200009000-00004","article-title":"Preinduction cervical assessment","volume":"43","author":"Edwards","year":"2000","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.23","first-page":"6","article-title":"Factors associated with failed induction of labour in a secondary care hospital","volume":"62","author":"Khan","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Pak Med Assoc"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"739","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-012-2341-3","article-title":"The bishop score as a determinant of labour induction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"286","author":"Teixeira","year":"2012","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-017-4418-5","article-title":"The role of prostaglandins E1 and E2, dinoprostone, and misoprostol in cervical ripening and the induction of labor: a mechanistic approach","volume":"296","author":"Bakker","year":"2017","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1016\/S0889-8545(05)70072-3","article-title":"Cervical ripening","volume":"26","author":"Riskin-Mashiah","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0730-7659.2004.00294.x"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(02)02047-1"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"498","DOI":"10.1097\/00006254-200208000-00011","article-title":"U.S. national trends in labor induction, 1989\u20131998","volume":"57","author":"Zhang","year":"2002","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.30","unstructured":"HaSCI C . NHS Maternity Statistics - England, 2013-14. In: Analysis Hes, 2015."},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.31","unstructured":"Welfare AIoHa . Australia\u2019s mothers and babies 2015\u2014in brief. In: Perinatal statistics series No. 33. cat No. per 91, 2017."},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.32","first-page":"1","article-title":"Births: final data for 2012","volume":"62","author":"Martin","year":"2013","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1509117"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"620","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0000000000000361","article-title":"Induction of labor using a Foley catheter or misoprostol: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"71","author":"Ten Eikelder","year":"2016","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0031-1275386","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean section: risk of uterine rupture with labor induction","volume":"28","author":"Ouzounian","year":"2011","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.09.022","article-title":"Association of induction of labor and uterine rupture in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean: a survival analysis","volume":"206","author":"Harper","year":"2012","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"734","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0b013e318273feeb","article-title":"Uterine rupture during trial of labor: controversy of induction's methods","volume":"67","author":"Ophir","year":"2012","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jozwiak M , Bloemenkamp KWM , Kelly AJ , et al . Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;25.doi:10.1002\/14651858.CD001233.pub2","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD001233.pub2"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"642","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200609000-00022","article-title":"Mechanical methods of cervical ripening and labor induction","volume":"49","author":"Gelber","year":"2006","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jozwiak M , Bloemenkamp KW , Kelly AJ , et al . Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;14.doi:10.1002\/14651858.CD001233.pub2","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD001233.pub2"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1619","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)00084-2","article-title":"Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial","volume":"387","author":"ten Eikelder","year":"2016","journal-title":"The Lancet"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"797","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2015.1011101","article-title":"Prospective multi-centre randomised trial comparing induction of labour with a double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone","volume":"35","author":"L\u00f8kkegaard","year":"2015","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1108","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0037-1603994","article-title":"A randomized trial of Foley balloon induction of labor trial in Multiparas (FIAT-M)","volume":"34","author":"Connolly","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1443","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01843.x","article-title":"A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction","volume":"115","author":"Prager","year":"2008","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.45","first-page":"145","article-title":"Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol: randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-M study) and systematic review and meta-analysis of literature","volume":"31","author":"Jozwiak","year":"2014","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2095","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(11)61484-0","article-title":"Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial","volume":"378","author":"Jozwiak","year":"2011","journal-title":"The Lancet"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"418","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.04.038","article-title":"Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis","volume":"203","author":"Vaknin","year":"2010","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.48","first-page":"140","article-title":"The transcervical foley catheter versus the vaginal prostaglandin e2 gel in the induction of labour in a previous one caesarean section - a clinical study","volume":"7","author":"Ziyauddin","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Clin Diagn Res"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.12.1.42.45","article-title":"Ripening of the uterine cervix in a post-cesarean parturient: prostaglandin E2 versus Foley catheter","volume":"12","author":"Ben-Aroya","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.50","first-page":"243","article-title":"Double balloon catheter for induction of labour in Chinese women with previous caesarean section: one-year experience and literature review","volume":"21","author":"Cheuk","year":"2015","journal-title":"Hong Kong Med J"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2777","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2017.1355906","article-title":"Foley catheter versus intravaginal prostaglandins E2 for cervical ripening in women at term with an unfavorable cervix: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"31","author":"Barda","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"212","DOI":"10.4236\/ojog.2013.31A039","article-title":"Double balloon device compared to oxytocin for induction of labour after previous caesarean section","volume":"03","author":"Ferradas","year":"2013","journal-title":"Open J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12320"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-015-0441-3","article-title":"Clinician-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): a systematic review","volume":"15","author":"Lundgren","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"West HM , Jozwiak M , Dodd JM , et al . Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;4.doi:10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009792.pub3"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1130","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0035-1558094","article-title":"The renaissance of transcervical balloon catheters for cervical ripening and labour induction","volume":"75","author":"Rath","year":"2015","journal-title":"Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Huisman CMA , Jozwiak M , de Leeuw JW , et al . Cervical ripening in the Netherlands: a survey. Obstet Gynecol Int 2013;2013 doi:10.1155\/2013\/745159","DOI":"10.1155\/2013\/745159"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/08037059209077502"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schulz KF , Altman DG , Moher D , et al . Consort 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010;340.doi:10.1136\/bmj.c332","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2010.09.006"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.61","unstructured":"The_National_Institute_for_Health_and_Care_Excellence . Caesarean Section National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2013."},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S62","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2004.01.011","article-title":"Obstructed labor: using better technologies to reduce mortality","volume":"85 Suppl 1","author":"Hofmeyr","year":"2004","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.63","first-page":"597","article-title":"Correlation of Apgar scores and umbilical artery acid-base status to mortality and morbidity in the low birth weight neonate","volume":"73","author":"Tejani","year":"1989","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"723","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2011.591459","article-title":"Comparison of two mechanical devices for cervical ripening: a prospective quasi-randomized trial","volume":"25","author":"Mei-Dan","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.07.507","article-title":"Double-balloon catheter and sequential oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term: a retrospective cohort study","volume":"204","author":"Kehl","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00287.x"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2998","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2016.1271407","article-title":"Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery at the university hospital in Barcelona","volume":"30","author":"Baranov","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2092","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2016.1237498","article-title":"Evaluation of outcomes associated with trial of labor after cesarean delivery after a change in clinical practice guidelines in an academic Hospital","volume":"30","author":"Bellows","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e31","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0037-1599129","article-title":"Validation of a prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery reveals unexpected success in a diverse American population","volume":"07","author":"Maykin","year":"2017","journal-title":"AJP Rep"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2016.03.007","article-title":"Vaginal birth after cesarean section-The world trend and local experience in Taiwan","volume":"56","author":"Tsai","year":"2017","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.71","unstructured":"Ganesan G Branch CQ , ed. Deliveries in Singapore. Singapore: Ministry of Health, Singapore, 2004."},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.72","unstructured":"Smith JA . Balloon dilators for labor induction: a historical review. J Med Ethics Hist Med 2013;6."},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13456","article-title":"A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour","volume":"123","author":"Chen","year":"2016","journal-title":"BJOG: Int J Obstet Gy"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001002"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.76","unstructured":"Tan TL , GY N , SEL L , et al . Cervical ripening balloon as an alternative for induction of labour: a randomized controlled trial. BJMP 2015;8."},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1089","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-018-4713-9","article-title":"Single versus double-balloon catheters for the induction of labor of singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials","volume":"297","author":"Lajusticia","year":"2018","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.13551","article-title":"Double-balloon versus single-balloon catheter for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"44","author":"Yang","year":"2018","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.02.019","article-title":"Foley catheter for induction of labour filled with 30 mL or 60 mL: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"211","author":"Sandberg","year":"2017","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0136856","article-title":"Foley catheter for induction of labor at term: an open-label, randomized controlled trial","volume":"10","author":"Gu","year":"2015","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"967","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2015.1027191","article-title":"Use of intracervical balloons and chorioamnionitis in term premature rupture of membranes","volume":"29","author":"Cabrera","year":"2016","journal-title":"The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"866","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0036-1580608","article-title":"Foley catheter or oral misoprostol for induction of labor in women with term premature rupture of membranes: a randomized multicenter trial","volume":"33","author":"Kruit","year":"2016","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"2025121510371008000_9.11.e028896.83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"360.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.038","article-title":"A randomized trial of Foley Bulb for Labor Induction in Premature Rupture of Membranes in Nulliparas (FLIP)","volume":"217","author":"Amorosa","year":"2017","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["BMJ Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2019-028896","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,15]],"date-time":"2025-12-15T18:37:24Z","timestamp":1765823844000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmjopen.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2019-028896"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,11]]},"references-count":83,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,6]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,11]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/bmjopen-2019-028896"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2019-028896","relation":{},"ISSN":["2044-6055","2044-6055"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2044-6055","type":"print"},{"value":"2044-6055","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,11]]}}}