{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,8]],"date-time":"2026-10-08T02:55:04Z","timestamp":1791428104083,"version":"4.3.3"},"reference-count":81,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,15]],"date-time":"2022-11-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1668470400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":14,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000272","name":"National Institute of Health Research","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","award":["NIHR129529"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["NIHR129529"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000272","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["BMJ Open"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,24]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To inform UK service development to support medical abortion at home, appropriate for person and context.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Design<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Realist review<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Setting\/participants<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Peer-reviewed literature from 1 January 2000 to 9 December 2021, describing interventions or models of home abortion care. Participants included people seeking or having had an abortion.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Interventions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Interventions and new models of abortion care relevant to the UK.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Outcome measures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Causal explanations, in the form of context-mechanism-outcome configurations, to test and develop our realist programme theory.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We identified 12\u2009401 abstracts, selecting 944 for full text assessment. Our final review included 50 papers. Medical abortion at home is safe, effective and acceptable to most, but clinical pathways and user experience are variable and a minority would not choose this method again. Having a choice of abortion location remains essential, as some people are unable to have a medical abortion at home. Choice of place of abortion (home or clinical setting) was influenced by service factors (appointment number, timing and wait-times), personal responsibilities (caring\/work commitments), geography (travel time\/distance), relationships (need for secrecy) and desire for awareness\/involvement in the process. We found experiences could be improved by offering: an option for self-referral through a telemedicine consultation, realistic information on a range of experiences, opportunities to personalise the process, improved pain relief, and choice of when and how to discuss contraception.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Acknowledging the work done by patients when moving medical abortion care from clinic to home is important. Patients may benefit from support to: prepare a space, manage privacy and work\/caring obligations, decide when\/how to take medications, understand what is normal, assess experience and decide when and how to ask for help. The transition of this complex intervention when delivered outside healthcare environments could be supported by strategies that reduce surprise or anxiety, enabling preparation and a sense of control.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2022-066650","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,16]],"date-time":"2022-11-16T10:01:58Z","timestamp":1668592918000},"page":"e066650","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"12","author":[{"given":"Paula","family":"Baraitser","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"King's College Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Caroline","family":"Free","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4340-7882","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Wendy V","family":"Norman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Family Practice, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada"},{"name":"Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3012-1132","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maria","family":"Lewandowska","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rebecca","family":"Meiksin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Melissa J","family":"Palmer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0304-823X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rachel","family":"Scott","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rebecca","family":"French","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kaye","family":"Wellings","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alice","family":"Ivory","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Geoff","family":"Wong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.1","unstructured":"Abortion statistics . England and Wales, 2020. Available: https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/statistics\/abortion-statistics-for-england-and-wales-2020\/abortion-statistics-england-and-wales-2020"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.2","unstructured":"Public health Scotland termination of pregnancy statistics. Available: https:\/\/publichealthscotland.scot\/publications\/termination-of-pregnancy-statistics\/termination-of-pregnancy-statistics-year-ending-december-2020\/"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000492"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.10.007","article-title":"Support for and interest in alternative models of medication abortion provision among a national probability sample of U.S. women","volume":"99","author":"Biggs","year":"2019","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2018-200060"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318224d110"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000498"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14401"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.j2011"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1363\/psrh.12073"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2020-200880","article-title":"Demand for self-managed online telemedicine abortion in eight European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: a regression discontinuity analysis","volume":"47","author":"Aiken","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1464","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16668","article-title":"Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of no-test medical abortion (termination of pregnancy) provided via telemedicine: a national cohort study","volume":"128","author":"Aiken","year":"2021","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2021.03.019"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjgh-2020-003934","article-title":"Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of medical abortion at home versus in the clinic: a systematic review and meta-analysis in response to COVID-19","volume":"5","author":"Gambir","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMJ Glob Health"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004312","article-title":"Medication abortion with pharmacist dispensing of mifepristone","volume":"137","author":"Grossman","year":"2021","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2019.05.013","article-title":"TelAbortion: evaluation of a direct to patient telemedicine abortion service in the United States","volume":"100","author":"Raymond","year":"2019","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsa2109779","article-title":"Abortion safety and use with normally prescribed mifepristone in Canada","volume":"386","author":"Schummers","year":"2022","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000603"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.conx.2020.100049"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2021.22320","article-title":"Safety and efficacy of telehealth medication abortions in the US during the COVID-19 pandemic","volume":"4","author":"Upadhyay","year":"2021","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2020-200976"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.21037\/mhealth.2018.01.01","article-title":"Telemedicine and medical abortion: dispelling safety myths, with facts","volume":"4","author":"Gill","year":"2018","journal-title":"Mhealth"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2021-201181"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2020-200661"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2021.04.027"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pawson R . Evidence based policy; a realist perspective. London: Sage, 2006.","DOI":"10.4135\/9781849209120"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s12916-016-0643-1","article-title":"RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluations","volume":"14","author":"Wong","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMC Med"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-048937"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2020-200612"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15684"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2018.12.002","article-title":"A comparison of termination of pregnancy procedures: patient choice, emotional impact and satisfaction with care","volume":"19","author":"Heath","year":"2019","journal-title":"Sex Reprod Healthc"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2020-200789"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)32801-8","article-title":"Access to abortion: what women want from abortion services","volume":"30","author":"Wiebe","year":"2008","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00538.x"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2021-201176"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3310\/hta13530","article-title":"Randomised preference trial of medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy less than 14 weeks' gestation (tops)","volume":"13","author":"Robson","year":"2009","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1016\/j.srhc.2016.07.003","article-title":"Women's experiences of having an early medical abortion at home","volume":"9","author":"Hedqvist","year":"2016","journal-title":"Sex Reprod Healthc"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2001","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14690","article-title":"Self-management of first trimester medical termination of pregnancy: a qualitative study of women's experiences","volume":"124","author":"Purcell","year":"2017","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1783\/147118909789587394"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-6712.2012.01068.x"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2018-200264","article-title":"Current barriers, facilitators and future improvements to advance quality of abortion care: views of women","author":"Smith","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ Sex Reprod Health"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/10410236.2020.1770507"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/jfprhc-2016-101641"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2010.01.015","article-title":"Benefits of using a digital video disk for providing information about abortion to women requesting termination of pregnancy","volume":"81","author":"Powell-Jackson","year":"2010","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13944"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16813"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2020-200954"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2018-200278"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2021-201263"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004208"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/13625187.2010.485257"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.11.1244","article-title":"Follow-up strategies to confirm the success of medical abortion of pregnancies up to 10 weeks' gestation: a systematic review with meta-analyses","volume":"222","author":"Schmidt-Hansen","year":"2020","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1160","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dex071","article-title":"Induced abortion","volume":"32","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"647","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12398","article-title":"Medical abortion with mifepristone and home administration of misoprostol up to 63 days' gestation","volume":"93","author":"L\u00f8keland","year":"2014","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)61054-0"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2018.03.013","article-title":"Low-sensitivity urine pregnancy testing to assess medical abortion outcome: a systematic review","volume":"98","author":"Raymond","year":"2018","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2017.12.004","article-title":"Self-assessment of medical abortion outcome using symptoms and home pregnancy testing","volume":"97","author":"Raymond","year":"2018","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2018-200098"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"796","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa031","article-title":"Early provision of intrauterine contraception as part of abortion care-5-year results of a randomised controlled trial","volume":"35","author":"Pohjoranta","year":"2020","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1317","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2021.09.010","article-title":"Preferences for contraceptive counseling and access among abortion patients at an independent clinic in Texas","volume":"105","author":"Iyer","year":"2022","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2013.09.013","article-title":"Understanding women's desires for contraceptive counseling at the time of first-trimester surgical abortion","volume":"89","author":"Matulich","year":"2014","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2011.03.009","article-title":"Patients' attitudes and experiences related to receiving contraception during abortion care","volume":"84","author":"Kavanaugh","year":"2011","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2017-101818"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12978-017-0329-y"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1186\/s40834-017-0043-8","article-title":"Process evaluation of a mobile phone-based intervention to support post-abortion contraception in Cambodia","volume":"2","author":"Smith","year":"2017","journal-title":"Contracept Reprod Med"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.67","first-page":"75","article-title":"Contraceptive counselling to prevent repeat unintended pregnancy: The abortion client\u2019s perspective","volume":"21","author":"Loeber","year":"2016","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.68","unstructured":"NHS reference costs 2019\/20 V2. Available: https:\/\/www.england.nhs.uk\/national-cost-collection\/#nccdata2 [Accessed 15 Feb 2022]."},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2020.12.010","article-title":"Abortion method preference among people presenting for abortion care","volume":"103","author":"Wingo","year":"2021","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Blaylock R , Makleff S , Whitehouse KC , et al . Client perspectives on choice of abortion method in England and Wales. BMJ Sex Reprod Health;97:bmjsrh-2021-201242.doi:10.1136\/bmjsrh-2021-201242","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2021-201242"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004082"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.72","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists . Comprehensive Abortion Care (Best Practice Paper No. 2, Issue.), 2015. Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. Available: https:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk\/en\/guidelines-research-services\/guidelines\/bpp2\/"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.73","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists . Clinical guidelines for early medical abortion at home \u2013 England, 2019. Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. Available: https:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk\/en\/guidelines-research-services\/guidelines\/early-medical-abortion-home-england\/"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.74","article-title":"Pain management for medical abortion before 14 weeks\u2019 gestation","volume":"5","author":"Reynolds\u2010Wright","year":"2020","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1071\/HC19050","article-title":"'I didn't feel judged': exploring women's access to telemedicine abortion in rural Australia","volume":"12","author":"Ireland","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Prim Health Care"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2014\/913241"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.77","first-page":"237","article-title":"A Constructivist vision of the first-trimester abortion experience","volume":"22","author":"Rowlands","year":"2020","journal-title":"Health Hum Rights"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s12978-021-01270-0","article-title":"It's a small bit of advice, but actually on the day, made such a difference\u2026: perceptions of quality in abortion care in England and Wales","volume":"18","author":"Whitehouse","year":"2021","journal-title":"Reprod Health"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2019-200568"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s12978-019-0759-9","article-title":"Spatial dimensions of telemedicine and abortion access: a qualitative study of women's experiences","volume":"16","author":"Ehrenreich","year":"2019","journal-title":"Reprod Health"},{"key":"2025101813555663000_12.11.e066650.81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.2196\/13387","article-title":"Feasibility and acceptability of a mobile technology intervention to support postabortion care in British Columbia: phase I","volume":"21","author":"Gill","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"}],"container-title":["BMJ Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2022-066650","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,18]],"date-time":"2025-10-18T20:56:09Z","timestamp":1760820969000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmjopen.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2022-066650"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,11]]},"references-count":81,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,16]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,11]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/bmjopen-2022-066650"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2022-066650","relation":{"has-preprint":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1101\/2022.07.13.22277600","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["2044-6055","2044-6055"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2044-6055","type":"print"},{"value":"2044-6055","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,11]]}}}