{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,17]],"date-time":"2026-10-17T02:57:01Z","timestamp":1792205821512,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,10]],"date-time":"2024-02-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1707523200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":9,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000272","name":"The National Institute for Health Research","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","award":["16\/16\/06"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["16\/16\/06"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000272","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["BMJ Open"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title><jats:p>Trial legislation enables research to be conducted without prior consent (RWPC) in emergency situations, yet this approach has rarely been used in time-critical obstetric trials. This study explored views and experiences of antenatal recruitment and consent and RWPC in an emergency intrapartum randomised clinical trial.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design<\/jats:title><jats:p>Embedded, mixed-methods study within a trial, involving questionnaires, recorded recruitment discussions, interviews and focus groups in the first 13 months of trial recruitment (December 2020\u2013January 2022).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Setting<\/jats:title><jats:p>COPE is a double-blind randomised controlled trial, comparing the effectiveness of carboprost or oxytocin as first-line treatment of postpartum haemorrhage.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Participants<\/jats:title><jats:p>Two hundred and eighty-six people (190\u2009women\/96 birth partners), linked to 198\/380 (52%) COPE recruits participated in the embedded study. Of these, 272 completed a questionnaire (178\u2009women\/94 birth partners), 22 were interviewed (19\u2009women\/3 birth partners) and 16 consent discussions with 12\u2009women were recorded. Twenty-seven staff took part in three focus groups and nine staff were interviewed.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Participants recommended that information about the study should be more accessible antenatally for those who wish to be informed. Most women and staff did not think it would be appropriate to seek consent during pregnancy or early labour as it may cause \u2018unnecessary panic\u2019 and lead to research waste, as most women would not become eligible. There was support for the use of RWPC as COPE interventions are used in standard clinical practice and viewed as low risk. Women who were approached about the trial while having a postpartum haemorrhage also supported RWPC as they could not recall research discussions.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title><jats:p>Findings support the use of RWPC for time-critical interventions, and raise questions about the appropriateness of other commonly used consent pathways, including antenatal consent and verbal assent.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2023-081874","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,11]],"date-time":"2024-02-11T01:36:28Z","timestamp":1707615388000},"page":"e081874","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Questioning approaches to consent in time critical obstetric trials: findings from a mixed-methods study"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"14","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3626-4927","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Elizabeth","family":"Deja","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Andrew","family":"Weeks","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Charlotte","family":"Van Netten","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Carrol","family":"Gamble","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shireen","family":"Meher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gillian","family":"Gyte","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1473-4956","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tina","family":"Lavender","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kerry","family":"Woolfall","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.1","unstructured":"Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists . Obtaining Valid Consent to Participate in Perinatal Research Where Consent is Time Critical. 2016."},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vernon G , Alfirevic Z , Weeks A . Issues of informed consent for intrapartum trials: a suggested consent pathway from the experience of the Release trial [ISRCTN13204258][ISRCTN13204258]. Trials 2006;7:13. doi:10.1186\/1745-6215-7-13","DOI":"10.1186\/1745-6215-7-13"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Russell AM , Shepherd V , Woolfall K , et al . Complex and alternate consent pathways in clinical trials: methodological and ethical challenges encountered by underserved groups and a call to action. Trials 2023;24:151. doi:10.1186\/s13063-023-07159-6","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-023-07159-6"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.03204.x","article-title":"Historical trends in the timing of informed consent for research into intrapartum complications","volume":"119","author":"Patel","year":"2012","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lawton J , Hallowell N , Snowdon C , et al . Written versus verbal consent: a qualitative study of stakeholder views of consent procedures used at the time of recruitment into a peripartum trial conducted in an emergency setting. BMC Med Ethics 2017;18:36. doi:10.1186\/s12910-017-0196-7","DOI":"10.1186\/s12910-017-0196-7"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lawton J , Snowdon C , Morrow S , et al . Recruiting and consenting into a peripartum trial in an emergency setting: a qualitative study of the experiences and views of women and healthcare professionals. Trials 2016;17:195. doi:10.1186\/s13063-016-1323-3","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-016-1323-3"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sweeney L , Lanz D , Daru J , et al . Deferred consent in emergency obstetric research: findings from qualitative interviews with women and recruiters in the ACROBAT pilot trial for severe postpartum haemorrhage. BMJ Open 2022;12:e054787. doi:10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-054787","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-054787"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1744","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15333","article-title":"What women think about consent to research at the time of an obstetric emergency: a qualitative study of the views of a cohort of World Maternal Antifibrinolytic Trial participants","volume":"125","author":"Houghton","year":"2018","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.9","unstructured":"The Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations. 2004."},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Woolfall K , Frith L , Gamble C , et al . How parents and practitioners experience research without prior consent (deferred consent) for emergency research involving children with life threatening conditions: a mixed method study. BMJ Open 2015;5:e008522. doi:10.1136\/bmjopen-2015-008522","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2015-008522"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/archdischild-2015-309245"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Woolfall K , Young B , Frith L , et al . Doing challenging research studies in a patient-centred way: a qualitative study to inform a randomised controlled trial in the paediatric emergency care setting. BMJ Open 2014;4:e005045. doi:10.1136\/bmjopen-2014-005045","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2014-005045"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Deja E , Peters MJ , Khan I , et al . Establishing and augmenting views on the acceptability of a paediatric critical care randomised controlled trial (the FEVER trial): a mixed methods study. BMJ Open 2021;11:e041952. doi:10.1136\/bmjopen-2020-041952","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2020-041952"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/archdischild-2016-312515"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.15","unstructured":"Woolfall K , Frith L , Dawson A , et al . Research without prior consent (deferred consent) in trials investigating the emergency treatmemt of critically ill children: CONNECT study guidance. Liverpool: University of Liverpol, 2015."},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Molyneux S , Njue M , Boga M , et al . \u201cThe words will pass with the blowing wind\u201d: staff and parent views of the deferred consent process, with prior assent, used in an emergency fluids trial in two African hospitals. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e54894. doi:10.1371\/journal.pone.0054894","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0054894"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3310\/hta23010"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/emermed-2020-209487"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Woolfall K , Frith L , Gamble C , et al . How experience makes a difference: practitioners\u2019 views on the use of deferred consent in paediatric and neonatal emergency care trials. BMC Med Ethics 2013;14:45. doi:10.1186\/1472-6939-14-45","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6939-14-45"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11135-017-0574-8"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.21","unstructured":"Baker SE , Edwards R . How many qualitative interviews is enough? National Centre for Research Methods (NCRM), 2012."},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.320.7226.50"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1049732315617444"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Braun V , Clarke V . What can \"thematic analysis\u2019\u2019offer health and wellbeing researchers? International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being. 2014;9:26152. doi:10.3402\/qhw.v9.26152","DOI":"10.3402\/qhw.v9.26152"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1391","DOI":"10.1007\/s11135-021-01182-y","article-title":"A worked example of Braun and Clarke\u2019s approach to reflexive thematic analysis","volume":"56","author":"Byrne","year":"2022","journal-title":"Qual Quant"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/798843"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/ebmh.2.4.99"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alvarez M , Hotton EJ , Harding S , et al . Women\u2019s and midwives\u2019 views on the optimum process for informed consent for research in a feasibility study involving an intrapartum intervention: a qualitative study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2023;9:98. doi:10.1186\/s40814-023-01330-1","DOI":"10.1186\/s40814-023-01330-1"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11606-010-1292-2"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.2007.020503"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/emermed-2020-209488"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1547-5069.2001.00253.x"},{"key":"2024021017353315000_14.2.e081874.33","unstructured":"Flick U . Triangulation in qualitative research. A companion to qualitative research. 2004;3:178\u201383."}],"container-title":["BMJ Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2023-081874","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,11]],"date-time":"2024-02-11T01:36:48Z","timestamp":1707615408000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmjopen.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2023-081874"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,2]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,10]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,2]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/bmjopen-2023-081874"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2023-081874","relation":{},"ISSN":["2044-6055","2044-6055"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2044-6055","type":"print"},{"value":"2044-6055","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,2]]}}}