{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,25]],"date-time":"2026-08-25T12:23:55Z","timestamp":1787660635929,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,9]],"date-time":"2025-05-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1746748800000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":8,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004443","name":"Warwick Medical School","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["PhD funding partner"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["PhD funding partner"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004443","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"eConsult","award":["PhD funding partner"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["PhD funding partner"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["BMJ Open"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,4]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To evaluate the role of using outputs from patient-facing online triage tools in clinical decision-making in primary care.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Design<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Systematic review.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Data sources<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science and Scopus were searched for literature published between 1 January 2002 and 31 December 2022 and updated for literature published up to end of November 2024.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Eligibility criteria for selecting studies<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Studies of any design are included where the study investigates how primary care clinicians make clinical decisions in response to patient concerns reported using online triage tools.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Data extraction and synthesis<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Data were extracted, and quality assessment was conducted using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Narrative synthesis was used to analyse the findings.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>14 studies were included, which were conducted in the UK (n=9), Sweden (n=3) and Spain (n=2). There were no studies that examined clinical decision-making as an outcome. Outcomes relating to the impact on clinical decision-making were grouped into three categories: patient clinical outcomes (n=9), primary care practitioner experience (n=11) and healthcare system outcomes (n=14). Studies reported faster clinical decisions made in response to patient concerns. Other studies reported clinicians offering unnecessary urgent appointments as patients learnt to \u2018game\u2019 the system. Clinicians felt confident managing patient requests as they can access additional information (such as a photo attachment). Moreover, clinicians\u2019 time was freed up from appointments with limited clinical value. Contrarily, online triage was perceived as an additional step in the workflow.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Clinicians should be aware that their decision-making processes are likely to differ when using online triage tools. Developers can use the findings to improve the usability of the tools to aid clinical decision-making. Future research should focus on patient-facing online triage tools in general practice and the process of clinical decision-making.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>PROSPERO registration number<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>CRD42022373944.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2024-094068","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,9]],"date-time":"2025-05-09T01:35:14Z","timestamp":1746754514000},"page":"e094068","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Patient-facing online triage tools and clinician decision-making: a systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"15","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0005-8373-8303","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Armina","family":"Paule","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Applied Health, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2231-5161","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gary A","family":"Abel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Health and Community Science, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jo","family":"Parsons","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Birmingham Centre for Evidence and Implementation Science (BCEIS), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Helen","family":"Atherton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.1","unstructured":"Advice on How Tp Establish a Remote \u201cTotal Triage\u201d Model in General Practice Using Online Consultations (Version 3). NHS England, 2020."},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3310\/hta19880"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1859","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(14)61058-8","article-title":"Telephone triage for management of same-day consultation requests in general practice (the ESTEEM trial): a cluster-randomised controlled trial and cost-consequence analysis","volume":"384","author":"Campbell","year":"2014","journal-title":"The Lancet"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.j4197","article-title":"Evaluation of telephone first approach to demand management in English general practice: observational study","volume":"358","author":"Newbould","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)00620-6"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.6","unstructured":"The NHS Long Term Place. NHS England: London, 2019."},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.7","unstructured":"Fit for the Future: A Vision for General Practice. London: Royal College of General Practice, 2019."},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.8","unstructured":"Gerada C , et al . The 2022 GP: A Vision for General Practice in the Future NHS. London: Royal College of General Practitioners, 2013."},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.2196\/21698","article-title":"Health Care Professionals\u2019 Experience of a Digital Tool for Patient Exchange, Anamnesis, and Triage in Primary Care: Qualitative Study","volume":"7","author":"Eldh","year":"2020","journal-title":"JMIR Hum Factors"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/02813432.2016.1144431"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3399\/bjgp16X685597"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.2196\/18203","article-title":"The Impact of Digital-First Consultations on Workload in General Practice: Modeling Study","volume":"22","author":"Salisbury","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj-2022-070757","article-title":"Formalising triage in general practice towards a more equitable, safe, and efficient allocation of resources","volume":"377","author":"Rodrigues","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"614","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2125.2012.04366.x","article-title":"How clinical decisions are made","volume":"74","author":"Bate","year":"2012","journal-title":"Brit J Clinical Pharma"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.7748\/en.2017.e1661","article-title":"Remote clinical decision-making: a clinician\u2019s definition","volume":"25","author":"Brady","year":"2017","journal-title":"Emerg Nurse"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3399\/bjgp17X693509"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6947-14-1"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3399\/bjgp18X700193"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3399\/bjgp19X706601"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Darley S , Coulson T , Peek N , et al . Understanding how the design and implementation of online consultations influence primary care outcomes: systematic review of evidence with recommendations for designers, providers, and researchers. Primary Care Research [Preprint] 2022. doi:10.1101\/2022.02.21.22271185","DOI":"10.1101\/2022.02.21.22271185"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.2196\/13042","article-title":"Electronic Consultation in Primary Care Between Providers and Patients: Systematic Review","volume":"7","author":"Mold","year":"2019","journal-title":"JMIR Med Inform"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moher D , Shamseer L , Clarke M , et al . Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Syst Rev 2015;1\u20139. doi:10.1186\/2046-4053-4-1","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.g7647"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/EFI-180221"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.24","unstructured":"Popay J , Roberts H , Sowden A , et al . Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. A product from the ESRC methods programme Version. 2006;1:b92. doi:10.13140\/2.1.1018.4643"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"498","DOI":"10.1080\/02813432.2022.2159200","article-title":"Digital consultation in primary healthcare: the effects on access, efficiency and patient safety based on provider experience; a qualitative study","volume":"40","author":"Eriksson","year":"2022","journal-title":"Scand J Prim Health Care"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3399\/BJGP.2021.0426"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3399\/bjgp17X693137"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2017-018688","article-title":"Feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of an online alternative to face-to-face consultation in general practice: a mixed-methods study of webGP in six Devon practices","volume":"8","author":"Carter","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph15050896","article-title":"Evaluation of a Digital Consultation and Self-Care Advice Tool in Primary Care: A Multi-Methods Study","volume":"15","author":"Cowie","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int J Environ Res Public Health"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2017-019966","article-title":"Implementing online consultations in primary care: a mixed-method evaluation extending normalisation process theory through service co-production","volume":"8","author":"Farr","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2150132720909656","DOI":"10.1177\/2150132720909656","article-title":"General Practitioners\u2019 Experiences of Digital Written Patient Dialogues: A Pilot Study Using a Mixed Method","volume":"11","author":"Johansson","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Prim Care Community Health"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-058247","article-title":"Use and usability of GP online services: a mixed-methods sequential study, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, based on qualitative interviews, analysis of routine eConsult usage and feedback data, and assessment of GP websites in Devon and Cornwall, England","volume":"12","author":"Jones","year":"2022","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjmilitary-2020-001660"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2017-016901","article-title":"Use of a primary care online consultation system, by whom, when and why: evaluation of a pilot observational study in 36 general practices in South West England","volume":"7","author":"Edwards","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.2196\/19149","article-title":"Teleconsultation Between Patients and Health Care Professionals in the Catalan Primary Care Service: Message Annotation Analysis in a Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study","volume":"22","author":"L\u00f3pez Segu\u00ed","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.2196\/14478","article-title":"General Practitioners\u2019 Perceptions of Whether Teleconsultations Reduce the Number of Face-to-face Visits in the Catalan Public Primary Care System: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study","volume":"22","author":"L\u00f3pez Segu\u00ed","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3399\/BJGP.2020.0948"},{"key":"2025121220393213000_15.5.e094068.38","unstructured":"England N . Online consultations. NHS App Guidance for GP practices, 2023. Available: https:\/\/digital.nhs.uk\/services\/nhs-app\/nhs-app-guidance-for-gp-practices\/guidance-on-nhs-app-features\/online-consultations [Accessed 29 Feb 2024]."}],"container-title":["BMJ Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2024-094068","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,13]],"date-time":"2025-12-13T04:39:39Z","timestamp":1765600779000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmjopen.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2024-094068"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,5]]},"references-count":38,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,8]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/bmjopen-2024-094068"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2024-094068","relation":{},"ISSN":["2044-6055","2044-6055"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2044-6055","type":"print"},{"value":"2044-6055","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,5]]}}}