{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,26]],"date-time":"2026-06-26T17:55:29Z","timestamp":1782496529868,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,4]],"date-time":"2026-02-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1770163200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":3,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000272","name":"National Institute for Health Research","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","award":["17\/85\/05"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["17\/85\/05"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000272","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["BMJ Open"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,18]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]},"abstract":"\n Objectives<\/jats:title>\n This process evaluation explores patient and healthcare professional acceptability of community-based monitoring versus hospital-based care for patients with quiescent neovascular age-related macular degeneration (QnAMD).<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Design<\/jats:title>\n Qualitative process evaluation was conducted as part of a randomised controlled trial.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Setting<\/jats:title>\n Six hospitals and six community-based practices.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Participants<\/jats:title>\n 25 patients and 16 healthcare professionals (ophthalmologists and optometrists). This approach helped differentiate between common issues and those specific to community-based monitoring.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Intervention<\/jats:title>\n The Quality-Assured Follow-Up of QnAMD by non-medical practitioners trial aimed to examine whether non-medical practitioners follow-up patients with QnAMD in the community in a safe and clinically and cost-effective way. The process evaluation aimed to examine whether the intervention was acceptable by patients and professionals. The process evaluation was based on interviews which contained open-ended questions focused on patient experience and confidence in community-based care, issues concerning the practicalities of the organisation and management of the clinic, and resources including IT and digital equipment. The theory of acceptability framework was used to interpret the findings.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n Patients reported positively on the experience of receiving QnAMD services in the community and highlighted staff professionalism and clear communication. Key themes were the proximity of care provision for patients, IT interoperability and the real-world costs of running the service. Some patients randomised to the hospital showed preference for the intervention to take place in the hospital, mediated mainly by prior experience of hospital care and travel distance. The location of the clinic and transport routes affected the experience of attending appointments, with strong preference expressed for proximity to one\u2019s home. Inaccessibility due to non-modifiable internal building structures in the community and parking in hospital eye services was reported by a small proportion of patients. Healthcare professionals reported positively about their ability to deliver QnAMD services in community settings but raised concerns about the compatibility of technological infrastructure that facilitates the sharing of optical coherence tomography image and video files. Some optometrists were also concerned about the financial sustainability of the intervention after the end of the trial due to the costs involved in the administration of QnAMD follow-up care.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n The delivery of QnAMD services in the community by non-medical personnel was broadly accepted by both patients and practitioners. This implies that non-medical practitioners can follow up patients with QnAMD in the community in a safe way. Further research would be needed to establish whether similar results would be obtained during routine practice outside a research project and whether the long-term follow-up for QnAMD would be financially sustainable for independent as well as chain community optometry practices.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Trial registration number<\/jats:title>\n \n NCT03893474<\/jats:ext-link>\n .\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2025-101379","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,4]],"date-time":"2026-02-04T15:40:40Z","timestamp":1770219640000},"page":"e101379","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Comparing community-based monitoring to hospital-based care of patients with quiescent age-related macular degeneration: a qualitative study of patient and practitioner perspectives on acceptability and access"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"16","clinical-trial-number":[{"clinical-trial-number":"nct03893474","registry":"10.18810\/clinical-trials-gov"}],"author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0788-0373","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sofia","family":"Vougioukalou","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Centre for Adult Social Care Research, Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Simon M","family":"Read","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Adults and Communities Department, Torfaen County Borough Council, Pontypool, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4597-3052","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Judit Katalin","family":"Csontos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2921-8236","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Aled","family":"Jones","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alijazy","family":"Jaber","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, England"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anitta","family":"Sharma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, England"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Konstantinos","family":"Balaskas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute of Ophthalmology, UCL, London, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"2026062610403142000_16.2.e101379.1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"782","DOI":"10.1111\/opo.12801","article-title":"Facilitators and barriers to the delivery of eye care by optometrists: a systematic review using the theoretical domains framework","volume":"41","author":"Toomey","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Physiologic Optic"},{"key":"2026062610403142000_16.2.e101379.2","unstructured":"Ophthalmologists RCo . The Way Forward. Options to help meet demand for the current and future care of patients with eye disease. 2017."},{"key":"2026062610403142000_16.2.e101379.3","unstructured":"Baird B , Fenney D , Jefferies D , et al . Making Care Closer to Home a Reality: Refocusing the System to Primary and Community Care. London: The King\u2019s Fund, 2024."},{"key":"2026062610403142000_16.2.e101379.4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"994","DOI":"10.1038\/s41433-023-02820-5","article-title":"Providing capacity in glaucoma care using trained and accredited optometrists: A qualitative evaluation","volume":"38","author":"Gunn","year":"2024","journal-title":"Eye (Lond)"},{"key":"2026062610403142000_16.2.e101379.5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.83.6.707"},{"key":"2026062610403142000_16.2.e101379.6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2934","DOI":"10.1038\/s41433-023-02444-9","article-title":"Implementation and scalability of shared care models for chronic eye disease: a realist assessment informed by health system stakeholders in Finland, the United Kingdom, and Australia","volume":"37","author":"Ford","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eye (Lond)"},{"key":"2026062610403142000_16.2.e101379.7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S2214-109X(13)70145-1"},{"key":"2026062610403142000_16.2.e101379.8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"498","DOI":"10.12968\/bjcn.2023.28.10.498","article-title":"Age-related macular degeneration: care of the patient in the community setting","volume":"28","author":"Stanford","year":"2023","journal-title":"Br J Community Nurs"},{"key":"2026062610403142000_16.2.e101379.9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2015-010685","article-title":"Effectiveness of Community versus Hospital Eye Service follow-up for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration with quiescent disease (ECHoES): a virtual non-inferiority trial","volume":"6","author":"Reeves","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"2026062610403142000_16.2.e101379.10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"864","DOI":"10.1111\/opo.12836","article-title":"Evaluation of training, patient and practitioner perspectives on community\u2010based monitoring of patients with stable age\u2010related macular degeneration compared to hospital\u2010based care: The FENETRE study report no. 1","volume":"41","author":"Read","year":"2021","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Physiologic Optic"},{"key":"2026062610403142000_16.2.e101379.11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-049411","article-title":"FENETRE study: quality-assured follow-up of quiescent neovascular age-related macular degeneration by non-medical practitioners: study protocol and statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled trial","volume":"11","author":"Learoyd","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"2026062610403142000_16.2.e101379.12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-13-117","article-title":"Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research","volume":"13","author":"Gale","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"2026062610403142000_16.2.e101379.13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa"},{"key":"2026062610403142000_16.2.e101379.14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-017-2031-8","article-title":"Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework","volume":"17","author":"Sekhon","year":"2017","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"key":"2026062610403142000_16.2.e101379.15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sharma A , Jaber A , Pal B , et al . Quality-assured integrated clinical care model for community monitoring of neovascular age-related macular degeneration in optometry practices the fenetre study: a multicentre, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. SSRN [Preprint]. doi:10.2139\/ssrn.5278556","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.5278556"},{"key":"2026062610403142000_16.2.e101379.16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"646","DOI":"10.5694\/mja11.10856","article-title":"Shared care for chronic eye diseases: perspectives of ophthalmologists, optometrists and patients","volume":"196","author":"O\u2019Connor","year":"2012","journal-title":"Med J Aust"},{"key":"2026062610403142000_16.2.e101379.17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaophthalmol.2023.3061"},{"key":"2026062610403142000_16.2.e101379.18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-023-09869-8","article-title":"Quality communication can improve patient-centred health outcomes among older patients: a rapid review","volume":"23","author":"Sharkiya","year":"2023","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"key":"2026062610403142000_16.2.e101379.19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2013-004714","article-title":"How do adults with physical disability experience primary care? A nationwide cross-sectional survey of access among patients in England","volume":"4","author":"Popplewell","year":"2014","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"2026062610403142000_16.2.e101379.20","unstructured":"Barnartt SN , Altman BM . Environmental Contexts and Disability 1st edn. United Kingdom: Emerald, 2014."},{"key":"2026062610403142000_16.2.e101379.21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Clarke P , Twardzik E . Chapter 8 - The Role of the Built Environment for Healthy Aging: Barriers and Enablers Ninth Edition. Elsevier Inc, 2021:115\u201330.","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-12-815970-5.00008-5"},{"key":"2026062610403142000_16.2.e101379.22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.2196\/38144","article-title":"The Impact of Electronic Health Record Interoperability on Safety and Quality of Care in High-Income Countries: Systematic Review","volume":"24","author":"Li","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"}],"container-title":["BMJ Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2025-101379","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,26]],"date-time":"2026-06-26T17:41:05Z","timestamp":1782495665000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmjopen.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2025-101379"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,4]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/bmjopen-2025-101379"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2025-101379","relation":{},"ISSN":["2044-6055","2044-6055"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2044-6055","type":"print"},{"value":"2044-6055","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]}}}