{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T12:30:24Z","timestamp":1787056224661,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1787011200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":17,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"University of Liverpool, Institute for Population Health Research & Scholarship Support Budget"},{"name":"National Institute for Health Research Senior Investigator Award","award":["NF-SI_0513-10025"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["NF-SI_0513-10025"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["BMJ Open"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,2]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>It is crucial that the outcomes used in clinical effectiveness studies are relevant to patients. This relevance can be assured by patients participating with other key stakeholders in core outcome set (COS) studies, yet recruiting patients to such studies can be challenging.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>As no guidance currently exists to help COS developers create good COS invitations for patients, which are usually the first documents patients see when invited to participate in COS studies, the Good Research Invitation Study aimed to produce such guidance.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Design<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Consensus meeting to agree on guidance for COS developers designing research invitations.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Setting and participants<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Informed by findings from our previous qualitative study of patient and public opinions on COS study invitations, our team, which included a patient research partner, produced an initial set of candidate recommendations. An online consensus meeting was organised in the UK with 13 participants including patient research partners with and without COS study experience, COS developers, a representative from an ethics committee and experts in diversity, marketing and science communication. Through a process of discussion and voting, the initial set of recommendations was refined.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>From the initial 35 recommendations, consensus meeting participants agreed a final set of 22 recommendations. Some initial recommendations were removed as they were beyond the scope, while others were merged. The finalised recommendations focused on producing and user testing invitations, reaching the audience, engaging potential COS participants and considering what they might find appealing or off-putting, explaining and creating interest in the study, keeping the invitation simple and understandable, considering the amount of information to include and how to present it, alongside ensuring accessibility. Discussion during the meeting highlighted the importance of improving the accessibility of all participant-facing resources in COS studies, not just the invitations.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Through consensus, a set of recommendations has been agreed on for use by COS developers to enhance study invitations for patients. Further testing and refinement of the recommendations will improve their utility.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2025-111017","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T11:50:36Z","timestamp":1787053836000},"page":"e111017","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["What makes a good research invitation for patient and public participants in core outcome set studies: a UK-based consensus meeting to develop guidance"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"16","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9103-2670","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Heather","family":"Barrington","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Health Data Science Department, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rebecca","family":"Craven","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Health Data Science Department, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9802-6636","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Paula R","family":"Williamson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Health Data Science Department, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6041-9901","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Bridget","family":"Young","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Health Data Science Department, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(13)62227-8"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.h809","article-title":"Avoidable waste of research related to inadequate methods in clinical trials","volume":"350","author":"Yordanov","year":"2015","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12916-018-1083-x"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2021.05.018"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)60329-9"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.k4645","article-title":"Research waste is still a scandal\u2014an essay by Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers","volume":"363","author":"Glasziou","year":"2018","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002049","article-title":"Why Most Clinical Research Is Not Useful","volume":"13","author":"Ioannidis","year":"2016","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/archdischild-2019-316823"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.9","first-page":"1174","article-title":"Patient perspective: fatigue as a recommended patient centered outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis","volume":"34","author":"Kirwan","year":"2007","journal-title":"J Rheumatol"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1016\/j.yebeh.2016.01.036","article-title":"Which outcomes should we measure in adult epilepsy trials? The views of people with epilepsy and informal carers","volume":"59","author":"Noble","year":"2016","journal-title":"Epilepsy Behav"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2023.03.022"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-022-06348-z","article-title":"Getting it wrong most of the time? Comparing trialists\u2019 choice of primary outcome with what patients and health professionals want","volume":"23","author":"Treweek","year":"2022","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.13","unstructured":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research . Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research - Patient Engagement Framework, 2025. Available: https:\/\/www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca\/e\/48413.html#a5 [Accessed 24 Feb 2025]."},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.14","unstructured":"Patient Centred Outcomes Research Institute . Engagement FAQs, 2025. Available: https:\/\/www.pcori.org\/funding-opportunities\/applicant-and-awardee-resources\/frequently-asked-questions\/engagement-faqs?utm_source=chatgpt.com [Accessed 24 Feb 2025]."},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.15","unstructured":"National Institute for Health Care Research . Best research for best health 2025. National Institute for Health Care Research,"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jep.12805"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-023-02054-9"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1369-7625.2012.00795.x"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/hex.12583"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/j.ajkd.2017.11.010"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3899\/jrheum.161123"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12593"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0099111","article-title":"Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review","volume":"9","author":"Gargon","year":"2014","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0066844","article-title":"Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review","volume":"8","author":"Dwan","year":"2013","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.25","unstructured":"The COMET Initiative . Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials, 2025. Available: https:\/\/www.comet-initiative.org\/ (n.d [Accessed 13 Feb 2025]."},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.26","unstructured":"The COMET Initiative . Core Outcome Set Endorsement, 2025. Available: https:\/\/www.comet-initiative.org\/COSEndorsement (n.d [Accessed 27 May 2025]."},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.27","unstructured":"World Health Organisation . Guidance for best practices for clinical trials. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2024."},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002447","article-title":"Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations","volume":"14","author":"Kirkham","year":"2017","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2019-032338","article-title":"Participating in core outcome set development via Delphi surveys: qualitative interviews provide pointers to inform guidance","volume":"9","author":"Biggane","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2017.04.024","article-title":"Improving core outcome set development: qualitative interviews with developers provided pointers to inform guidance","volume":"86","author":"Gargon","year":"2017","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-051066","article-title":"Patient participation in Delphi surveys to develop core outcome sets: systematic review","volume":"11","author":"Barrington","year":"2021","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Barrington HJ , Craven RJ , Williamson PR , et al . Do patients and the public understand and feel engaged and valued after reading outcome set study invitations? A UK qualitative study? BMJ Open 2026;1\u201313. doi:10.1136\/bmjopen-2025-111016","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2025-111016"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11739-014-1156-6"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Murphy MK , Nhs R , Programme DH , et al . Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development \/ M.K. Murphy\u2026[et al]. Southampton: National Coordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment, 1998.","DOI":"10.3310\/hta2030"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/aet2.10891","article-title":"Educator\u2019s blueprint: A primer on consensus methods in medical education research","volume":"7","author":"Gottlieb","year":"2023","journal-title":"AEM Educ Train"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1004390","article-title":"ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document (ACCORD) explanation and elaboration: Guidance and examples to support reporting consensus methods","volume":"21","author":"Logullo","year":"2024","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"2026081804501288000_16.8.e111017.37","unstructured":"UK Government . Introduction to AI Guide with a focus on Counter Fraud, 2024. Available: https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/publications\/introduction-to-ai-with-a-focus-on-counter-fraud\/introduction-to-ai-guide-with-a-focus-on-counter-fraud-html?utm_source=chatgpt.com#what-is-a-deep-fake"}],"container-title":["BMJ Open"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2025-111017","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T11:50:41Z","timestamp":1787053841000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmjopen.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2025-111017"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/bmjopen-2025-111017"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2025-111017","relation":{},"ISSN":["2044-6055","2044-6055"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2044-6055","type":"print"},{"value":"2044-6055","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]}}}