{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,31]],"date-time":"2025-08-31T21:10:01Z","timestamp":1756674601806,"version":"3.44.0"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,9]],"date-time":"2022-11-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1667952000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":8,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"Health Education England","award":["no award\/grant number"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["no award\/grant number"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["BMJ Open Qual"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,24]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>A fertility clinic observed a reduction in its fresh intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) implantation rate key performance indicator (KPI) below benchmark threshold which was further monitored but did not improve. The clinic had been performing ICSI successfully for &gt;16 years with good ICSI implantation rates meeting benchmark level. A root cause analysis (RCA) was conducted, including the input from an external observer, reviewing all systems and processes. A bundle of recommended changes was implemented as part of an improvement cycle with the aim to increase fresh ICSI implantation rates back to benchmark. Quality improvement (QI) methodology and tools were used including Statistical-Process-Control charts (BaseLine SAASoft). Measurements included standard clinical outcome data. KPIs were tracked following defined and controlled clinical and laboratory changes. Fresh ICSI implantation rates improved significantly (p=0.013, ChiSq). The improvement work was limited by its design of a plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycle \u2018intervention bundle\u2019 as opposed to small PDSA cycles of single changes. Therefore, the improvement could not be attributed to any singular intervention within the bundle. It took longer than anticipated to see improvement due to the impact of the pandemic. The QI project highlighted the difficulty for clinics with low cycle volumes to sensitively monitor KPI\u2019s in a timely and responsive way. The need to accumulate sufficient data to be confident of any trends\/concerns means small clinics could be less responsive to any problems or too reactive to false positives. It is important to disseminate the learning from this improvement work because there is currently no agreed standardised optimal protocol for ICSI, resulting in clinics using slightly different approaches, and there are limited published reports where embryology KPI\u2019s are tracked following defined and controlled laboratory\/clinical changes. This project provides useful knowledge about ICSI improvement interventions and could be more effective within a larger clinic with higher cycle volumes.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjoq-2022-002003","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,9]],"date-time":"2022-11-09T10:35:16Z","timestamp":1667990116000},"page":"e002003","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Improving ICSI success rates following root cause analysis and use of system behaviour charts: the devil is in the detail!"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Emma","family":"Woodland","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Life Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Michael","family":"Carroll","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Life Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"2025083113311604000_11.4.e002003.1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey349","article-title":"Tracking quality: can embryology key performance indicators be used to identify clinically relevant shifts in pregnancy rate?","volume":"34","author":"Hammond","year":"2019","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2025083113311604000_11.4.e002003.2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hox011","article-title":"The Vienna consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of art laboratory performance indicators","volume":"2017","year":"2017","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"2025083113311604000_11.4.e002003.3","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(92)92425-F"},{"key":"2025083113311604000_11.4.e002003.4","first-page":"387","article-title":"Making ICSI safer and more effective: a review of the human oocyte and ICSI practice","volume":"30","author":"Simopoulou","year":"2016","journal-title":"In Vivo"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"2025083113311604000_11.4.e002003.5","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjqs-2015-005076"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"2025083113311604000_11.4.e002003.6","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/26.s1.52"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"2025083113311604000_11.4.e002003.7","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02620943"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"2025083113311604000_11.4.e002003.8","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmv050"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"2025083113311604000_11.4.e002003.9","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/13.4.1014"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"2025083113311604000_11.4.e002003.10","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1025476910771"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"2025083113311604000_11.4.e002003.11","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)61649-5"},{"key":"2025083113311604000_11.4.e002003.12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2226","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa211","article-title":"The effect of denudation and injection timing in the reproductive outcomes of ICSI cycles: new insights into the risk of in vitro oocyte ageing","volume":"35","author":"Carvalho","year":"2020","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"2025083113311604000_11.4.e002003.13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.09.022"},{"key":"2025083113311604000_11.4.e002003.14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"797","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey067","article-title":"Is there a relation between the time to ICSI and the reproductive outcomes?","volume":"33","author":"Pujol","year":"2018","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"2025083113311604000_11.4.e002003.15","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(00)01692-7"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"2025083113311604000_11.4.e002003.16","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(98)00530-5"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"2025083113311604000_11.4.e002003.17","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/13.6.1606"},{"unstructured":"ARCS BFS 2020 UK best practice guidelines for reintroduction of routine fertility treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic. V2.0. Available: https:\/\/www.britishfertilitysociety.org.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/ARCS-BFS-COVID-19-guideline-v.2.0-Copy.pdf","key":"2025083113311604000_11.4.e002003.18"}],"container-title":["BMJ Open Quality"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjoq-2022-002003","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,31]],"date-time":"2025-08-31T20:31:24Z","timestamp":1756672284000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/qir.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjoq-2022-002003"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,11]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,9]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,11]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/bmjoq-2022-002003"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjoq-2022-002003","relation":{},"ISSN":["2399-6641"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2399-6641"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,11]]}}}