{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T01:35:37Z","timestamp":1787016937677,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"BMJ","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,14]],"date-time":"2023-11-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1699920000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":13,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["BMJ Surg Interv Health Technologies"],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,1]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal approach for patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse. The aim of this international survey was to assess the patterns in treatment of rectal prolapse.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Design<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A 23-question survey was distributed to the Pelvic Floor Consortium of the American Society of Colorectal Surgeons, the Colorectal Surgical Society of Australia and New Zealand, and the Pelvic Floor Society. Questions pertained to surgeon and practice demographics, preoperative evaluation, procedural preferences, and educational needs.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Setting<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Electronic survey distributed to colorectal surgeons of diverse practice settings<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Participants<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>249 colorectal surgeons responded to the survey, 65% of which were male. There was wide variability in age, years in practice, and practice setting.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Main outcome measures<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Responses to questions regarding preoperative workup preferences and clinical scenarios.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In preoperative evaluation, 19% would perform anorectal physiology testing and 70% would evaluate for concomitant pelvic organ prolapse. In a healthy patient, 90% would perform a minimally invasive abdominal approach, including ventral rectopexy (56%), suture rectopexy (31%), mesh rectopexy (6%) and resection rectopexy (5%). In terms of ventral rectopexy, surgeons in the Americas preferred a synthetic mesh (61.9% vs 38.1%, p=0.59) whereas surgeons from Australasia preferred biologic grafts (75% vs 25%, p&lt;0.01). In an older patient with comorbidities 81% would perform a perineal approach. Procedure preference (Delormes vs Altmeier) varied according to location (Australasia, 85.9% vs 14.1%; Europe, 75.3% vs 24.7%; Americas, 14.1% vs 85.9%). Most participants were interested in education regarding surgical approaches, however there is wide variability in preferred methods.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>There is significant variability in the preoperative evaluation and surgery performed for rectal prolapse. Given the lack of consensus, it is not surprising that most surgeons desire further education on the topic.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsit-2023-000198","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,14]],"date-time":"2023-11-14T20:00:12Z","timestamp":1699992012000},"page":"e000198","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["The international variability of surgery for rectal prolapse"],"prefix":"10.1136","volume":"5","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3199-9692","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jesse K","family":"Kelley","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Edward R","family":"Hagen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Brooke","family":"Gurland","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Andrew RL","family":"Stevenson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"suffix":"Jr.","given":"James W","family":"Ogilvie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,14]]},"reference":[{"key":"2024051514375373000_5.1.e000198.1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1059","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-013-2427-7","article-title":"Rectal Prolapse: an overview of clinical features, diagnosis, and patient-specific management strategies","volume":"18","author":"Bordeianou","year":"2014","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"key":"2024051514375373000_5.1.e000198.2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.12177"},{"key":"2024051514375373000_5.1.e000198.3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/bjsopen\/zrab140","article-title":"Comparison of four surgical approaches for Rectal Prolapse: Multicentre randomized clinical trial","volume":"6","author":"Smedberg","year":"2022","journal-title":"BJS Open"},{"key":"2024051514375373000_5.1.e000198.4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"440","DOI":"10.1007\/s10350-005-0315-2","article-title":"Management of recurrent Rectal Prolapse: surgical approach influences outcome","volume":"49","author":"Steele","year":"2006","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"2024051514375373000_5.1.e000198.5","article-title":"Surgery for complete Rectal Prolapse in adults","volume":"8","author":"Tou","year":"2008","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"2024051514375373000_5.1.e000198.6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"773","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2006.01.030","article-title":"How accurate are published recurrence rates after Rectal Prolapse surgery? A meta-analysis of individual patient data","volume":"191","author":"DiGiuro","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"2024051514375373000_5.1.e000198.7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1027","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-013-1649-1","article-title":"Impact of Prolapse mass on contour Transtar technique for third-degree Rectal Prolapse","volume":"28","author":"Petersen","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"2024051514375373000_5.1.e000198.8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"700","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.12110","article-title":"Day-case Laparoscopic ventral Rectopexy: an achievable reality","volume":"15","author":"Powar","year":"2013","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"2024051514375373000_5.1.e000198.9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.13255"},{"key":"2024051514375373000_5.1.e000198.10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2149","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpedsurg.2019.02.017","article-title":"Surgical management of pediatric Rectal Prolapse: A survey of the American pediatric surgical Association (APSA)","volume":"54","author":"Trappey","year":"2019","journal-title":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery"},{"key":"2024051514375373000_5.1.e000198.11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/DCR.0000000000000889"},{"key":"2024051514375373000_5.1.e000198.12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.13772","article-title":"Surgery for constipation: systematic review and practice recommendations: results III: Rectal wall Excisional procedures (Rectal Excision","volume":"19 Suppl 3","author":"Mercer-Jones","year":"2017","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"2024051514375373000_5.1.e000198.13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/DCR.0000000000000402"},{"key":"2024051514375373000_5.1.e000198.14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"742","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000001401","article-title":"Long-term outcome after Laparoscopic ventral mesh Rectopexy","volume":"262","author":"Consten","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"2024051514375373000_5.1.e000198.15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2019.08.014","article-title":"Functional outcome after Laparoscopic posterior Sutured Rectopexy versus ventral mesh Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: six-year follow-up of a double-blind, randomized single-center study","volume":"16","author":"Hidaka","year":"2019","journal-title":"EClinicalMedicine"},{"key":"2024051514375373000_5.1.e000198.16","first-page":"1170","article-title":"Efficacy analysis of Altemeier and Delorme procedures for the Rectal Prolapse","volume":"22","author":"Xu","year":"2019","journal-title":"Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi"},{"key":"2024051514375373000_5.1.e000198.17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1007\/s10151-015-1337-y","article-title":"Comparing Perineal repairs for Rectal Prolapse: Delorme versus Altemeier","volume":"19","author":"Elagili","year":"2015","journal-title":"Tech Coloproctol"},{"key":"2024051514375373000_5.1.e000198.18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"650","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.12219","article-title":"Synthetic or biological mesh use in Laparoscopic ventral mesh Rectopexy--a systematic review","volume":"15","author":"Smart","year":"2013","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"2024051514375373000_5.1.e000198.19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.3393\/ac.2017.33.2.46","article-title":"Synthetic versus biological mesh-related erosion after Laparoscopic ventral mesh Rectopexy: A systematic review","volume":"33","author":"Balla","year":"2017","journal-title":"Ann Coloproctol"}],"container-title":["BMJ Surgery, Interventions, &amp; Health Technologies"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjsit-2023-000198","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,15]],"date-time":"2024-05-15T17:55:51Z","timestamp":1715795751000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/sit.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjsit-2023-000198"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,11]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,14]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,11]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1136\/bmjsit-2023-000198"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjsit-2023-000198","relation":{},"ISSN":["2631-4940"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2631-4940","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,11]]}}}