{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T23:11:28Z","timestamp":1740179488978,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"BMJ","funder":[{"name":"Institute of Medical Ethics","award":["(N\/A)"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["(N\/A)"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["bmj.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["BMJ Sex Reprod Health"],"abstract":"<jats:sec><jats:title>Background<\/jats:title><jats:p>Telemedical early medical abortion (TEMA) was introduced in England and Wales as a temporary measure in 2020 and was made permanent in 2022. While there are considerable data showing the safety, efficacy, and acceptability of TEMA for patients, there have been objections raised to TEMA based on safeguarding\u2014particularly for people under 18 years of age. Little is known about abortion care providers\u2019 views and experiences of carrying out their safeguarding duties with people aged under 18 in the shift to TEMA.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>This is a qualitative study involving online semi-structured interviews and reflexive thematic analysis. Audio-recorded, semi-structured interviews with abortion providers in England and Wales (n=20) generated data about their views and experiences of safeguarding in telemedical abortion care. Recordings were transcribed verbatim and then subject to reflexive thematic analysis to construct themes.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>While the study was designed with adult safeguarding in mind, the safeguarding of under 18s became a key area of discussion. Three major themes were constructed in relation to under 18s: (1) age as a risk factor in safeguarding; (2) telemedicine as improving access to care; and (3) telemedicine as enhancing communication.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Care providers believe TEMA has benefitted the under 18s. There was a strong feeling both that TEMA had improved access (which, in turn, improved safeguarding) and that under 18s were comfortable communicating using remote means. Providers believe safeguarding proformas must account for the different nature of risks where service users are under 18, but that it is disproportionate to assume that TEMA is unsuitable for all under 18s or groups of under 18s.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2022-201762","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,27]],"date-time":"2023-01-27T18:21:47Z","timestamp":1674843707000},"page":"bmjsrh-2022-201762","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Early telemedical abortion, safeguarding, and under 18s: a qualitative study with care providers in England and Wales"],"prefix":"10.1136","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8774-4015","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Elizabeth Chloe","family":"Romanis","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1050-6051","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jordan A","family":"Parsons","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"239","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"2023012710201223000_bmjsrh-2022-201762v1.1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.healthpol.2020.11.006","article-title":"2020 developments in the provision of early medical abortion by telemedicine in the UK","volume":"125","author":"Parsons","year":"2021","journal-title":"Health Policy"},{"key":"2023012710201223000_bmjsrh-2022-201762v1.2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Romanis EC , Parsons JA , Hodson N . COVID-19 and reproductive justice in Great Britain and the United States: ensuring access to abortion care during a global pandemic. J Law Biosci 2020;7. doi:10.1093\/jlb\/lsaa027","DOI":"10.1093\/jlb\/lsaa027"},{"key":"2023012710201223000_bmjsrh-2022-201762v1.3","unstructured":"Abortion Act 1967, s.1(3) as amended by Health and Care Act, s.178. 2022."},{"key":"2023012710201223000_bmjsrh-2022-201762v1.4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1464","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16668","article-title":"Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of no-test medical abortion (termination of pregnancy) provided via telemedicine: a national cohort study","volume":"128","author":"Aiken","year":"2021","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"2023012710201223000_bmjsrh-2022-201762v1.5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2021.04.027"},{"key":"2023012710201223000_bmjsrh-2022-201762v1.6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2020-200954"},{"key":"2023012710201223000_bmjsrh-2022-201762v1.7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Parsons JA , Romanis EC . Early medical abortion, equality of access, and the telemedical imperative. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.","DOI":"10.1093\/med\/9780192896155.001.0001"},{"key":"2023012710201223000_bmjsrh-2022-201762v1.8","unstructured":"Christian Concern . Tell the government not to extend DIY abortion policy. 2021. Available: https:\/\/christianconcern.com\/action\/tell-the-government-not-to-extend-diy-abortion-policy\/"},{"key":"2023012710201223000_bmjsrh-2022-201762v1.9","unstructured":"Christian Action Research and Education . Response to call for submissions on women\u2019s and girls\u2019 sexual and reproductive health and rights in situations of crisis. 2020. Available: https:\/\/www.ohchr.org\/sites\/default\/files\/Documents\/Issues\/Women\/WG\/ReproductiveHealthRights\/CSOs\/christianactionforresearchandeducation\/christianaction.pdf [Accessed 20 Oct 2022]."},{"key":"2023012710201223000_bmjsrh-2022-201762v1.10","unstructured":"Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech area health authority [1986] AC 112."},{"key":"2023012710201223000_bmjsrh-2022-201762v1.11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(21)01062-X","article-title":"Safeguarding and teleconsultation for abortion","volume":"398","author":"Romanis","year":"2021","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"2023012710201223000_bmjsrh-2022-201762v1.12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2020-200891"},{"key":"2023012710201223000_bmjsrh-2022-201762v1.13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1007\/s10728-021-00439-9","article-title":"The case for telemedical early medical abortion in England: dispelling adult safeguarding concerns","volume":"30","author":"Parsons","year":"2022","journal-title":"Health Care Anal"},{"key":"2023012710201223000_bmjsrh-2022-201762v1.14","unstructured":"Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health . Safeguarding guidance for children and young people under 18 accessing early medical abortion services [RCPCH]. 2022. Available: https:\/\/childprotection.rcpch.ac.uk\/resources\/safeguarding-guidance-for-children-and-young-people-under-18-accessing-early-medical-abortion-services\/ [Accessed 20 Oct 2022]."},{"key":"2023012710201223000_bmjsrh-2022-201762v1.15","unstructured":"Bowling A . Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. 3rd edn. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2009."},{"key":"2023012710201223000_bmjsrh-2022-201762v1.16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa"},{"key":"2023012710201223000_bmjsrh-2022-201762v1.17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"589","DOI":"10.1080\/2159676X.2019.1628806","article-title":"Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis","volume":"11","author":"Braun","year":"2019","journal-title":"Qual Res Sport Exerc Health"},{"key":"2023012710201223000_bmjsrh-2022-201762v1.18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.53841\/bpsqmip.2022.1.33.46","article-title":"Thematic analysis: a practical guide","volume":"1","author":"Braun","year":"2022","journal-title":"BPS QMiP"},{"key":"2023012710201223000_bmjsrh-2022-201762v1.19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.008","article-title":"Modern methods to induce abortion: safety, efficacy and choice","volume":"63","author":"Kapp","year":"2020","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"2023012710201223000_bmjsrh-2022-201762v1.20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sheldon S , Davis G , O\u2019Neill J , et al . The Abortion Act 1967: a biography of a UK law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.","DOI":"10.1017\/9781108677295"},{"key":"2023012710201223000_bmjsrh-2022-201762v1.21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjsrh-2021-201309"}],"container-title":["BMJ Sexual &amp; Reproductive Health"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/syndication.highwire.org\/content\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjsrh-2022-201762","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,27]],"date-time":"2023-01-27T18:22:00Z","timestamp":1674843720000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/jfprhc.bmj.com\/lookup\/doi\/10.1136\/bmjsrh-2022-201762"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,27]]},"references-count":21,"alternative-id":["10.1136\/bmjsrh-2022-201762"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjsrh-2022-201762","relation":{},"ISSN":["2515-1991","2515-2009"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2515-1991"},{"type":"electronic","value":"2515-2009"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,27]]}}}